• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

My theory about psychics

chillzero

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Dec 11, 2002
Messages
15,547
I have read through Kelly's blog, as well as numerous other sites detailing psychic readings, and based on what I have read, added very much to my own personal experience, I have come to a conclusion.

Psychics are frustrated unpublished writers.

I am an amatuer writer - I love horror fiction, and tales with a twist. I prefer short stories because they can pack a harder punch, without reams and reams of unneccessary details. I have a very vivid imagination, that I know helped me visualise things back in my woo days for meditations, readings and so on. These days I know how to keep my dreamt up stories separate from my perceptions of reality, and I know when I imagine something that it is not a spirit-given flash of insight.

Most psychics (there are exceptions) seem to me to have tons and tons of imagination. They come up with loads of scenarios of how people die. They describe people with 'dishwater blond hair', or menacing looking men with dark burning eyes or locations with incredible poetic details. They give paragraphs of 'information' about where and how people die or were abducted. They concentrate on those moments around death and how the person felt at that last breath.

Now, perhaps these people could be successful writers, but many seem to have a very poor grasp of grammar and spelling. They rush out all the words and information without checking it over for construction and readability. So, I wonder if we should refer psychics to good writing courses, and divert their imagination to an area that they can clearly see is focussed on fiction. It may help some of them acheive the level of recognition they clearly crave, and would help make their ramblings more understandable at the very least.

Many I am sure would continue in their belief structure, but if they are spending their time more constructively - writing books and doing the Oprah circuit - then that gives their more vulnerable targets some breathing space. They are also more in the public eye, and therefore more accountable for 'information' given out, reducing the ability to scam people for more money in exchange for more 'information'. Additionally, the more the market is watered down by the less successful and clearly incorrect psychics, the easier it will be for public perception to swing round to more rational querying of the psychic fad.

Perhaps we could see more people give Stephen King a good run for his money if psychics were to utilise their talents in a new direction, that is really more appropriate than wasting the time and energy of families in distress.
 
Unfortunately, most successful (note: not real) psychics are published writers, making millions off their books.
 
I’m going to have to disagree with your premise, chillzero. I don’t think psychics have such great imaginations.

The lexicon of spiritualism strikes me as tiresome and lacking innovation at every level. There are never any novel explanations for the existence of psychic phenomena, for its operation, or for its domain of effectiveness.

I understand your argument for their descriptive powers, but I have yet to hear a psychic describe a death or location that hasn’t been described by a hundred B-list movies, or bad TV crime dramas.

You’re trying to find something positive for these folks to pursue, which is a good idea. I just think you’re zeroing in on a weakness, not a strength.
 
I'll tell you my theory about psychics: They are all as dumb as a bag of hammers.

Keep that in mind the next time you encounter one and you will see it is true. :)

I'm with Ryan. Psychics are not creative people.

While researching another topic on here, I came across a list of 10 things you didn't know about psychics on the Court TV web site, which features "Psychic Detectives".

Here is number 8:

Many psychics like to “escape” the weight of their abilities with movies and television.

Like Ryan said:
I understand your argument for their descriptive powers, but I have yet to hear a psychic describe a death or location that hasn’t been described by a hundred B-list movies, or bad TV crime dramas.
 
Because psychics are uncreative and stupid, how is it that so many intelligent people are fooled by them?

Because the victims want to believe it is true very badly, and allow themselves to be fooled.

Every con depends absolutely on the victim's desire for the scam to be real.
 
Now, I said that they are frustrated - not necessarily good.

I think that their imaginations run away with them, and they don't allow themselves to realise that they are doing just that - imagining scenarios.

(I guess I've showed why I'm merely a frustrated writer myself - and not a current best seller!! :D)
 
I can think of similar things that psychics could better be channeling their energy into (pun intended).

In addition to writing, there's also counseling, where they could put empathy, a desire to assist those in crisis, the attention to detail necessary for cold reading and similar people-skills to legitimate use.

And acting--being able to pretend that imaginary things are real and fool themselves and/or others into thinking that what they're talking about is true.
 
I can think of similar things that psychics could better be channeling their energy into (pun intended).

In addition to writing, there's also counseling, where they could put empathy, a desire to assist those in crisis, the attention to detail necessary for cold reading and similar people-skills to legitimate use.

I don't think a person who is dumber than a bag of hammers would make a good counselor.

And acting--being able to pretend that imaginary things are real and fool themselves and/or others into thinking that what they're talking about is true.

Ah. The perfect place for someone dumber than a bag of hammers. Hollywood!
 
I see that the UK has a law that can adversely effect psychics. I have never seen anything in US law that was similar. Does anyone know if there is?
 

Back
Top Bottom