• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Moral Dilemma for the Hour

a_unique_person

Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Messages
49,633
Location
Waiting for the pod bay door to open.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/World...s-in-Uzbekistan/2005/05/14/1116024400438.html

Soldiers have opened fire on thousands of protesters in an attempt to put down an uprising that began with an armed raid on a prison to free 23 businessmen on trial for alleged Islamic extremism. Witnesses said dozens of people were killed.

As night fell, sporadic gunfire continued to reverberate in the streets of Andijan. It was unclear who held control in the former Soviet state's fourth-largest city of 350,000 people today.

The violence was a sharp contrast to largely peaceful uprisings that sparked regime changes in the ex-Soviet republics of Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan over the past 18 months. But President Islam Karimov is regarded as one of the harshest leaders in the former Soviet Union and apparently aims to quickly stifle any perceived threats to his regime.

Uzbekistan, which hosts a US air base and is a minor oil exporter, is frequently denounced by human rights groups and Western governments for torture and repression of the opposition.

Complaints of religious repression were at the heart of the violence: the men on trial were accused of being members of a group allied with the outlawed radical Islamic party Hizb-ut-Tahrir. But their supporters claim they were victims of repression by Karimov's secular government.

I'm confused. Where is the moral clarity here?
 
I'm confused. Where is the moral clarity here?

If the report is believed, they are fighting a radical Islamic group called "Liberation Army".

I don't know anything about this group in particular, but in every other such group of the same type, the "liberation" in question is the "liberation" of some area from everybody who doesn't think exactly like them.

I also know that, in general, claims of "religious discrimination" are popular propaganda tools used by Islamist terror groups (e.g., the Islamic Brotherhood in Egypt, etc.) The seriousness of such claims can be seen by what these "discriminated" groups do to anybody who disagrees with their religion if and when they gain power.

Therefore: while this might be an exception, generally speaking, if you are "religiously prosecuting" an Islamic "liberation army", you are probably doing the right thing, namely, resisting Jihad.

As the US is committed to fighting the worldwide Jihad, it is being morally clear in supporting this regime.
 

Back
Top Bottom