http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19325964.600&feedId=online-news_rss20
New Scientist has an online article stating researchers at University of Minnesota have used the same data , relabelled, to support different findings in different publications. Investigations in 2006 found the relabelling to be a mistake, but it appears to be a mistake that has happened more than once.
The data relate to "multipotent adult progenitor cells" - adult stem cells claimed to be potential substitutes for embryo stem cells.
New Scientist has an online article stating researchers at University of Minnesota have used the same data , relabelled, to support different findings in different publications. Investigations in 2006 found the relabelling to be a mistake, but it appears to be a mistake that has happened more than once.
The data relate to "multipotent adult progenitor cells" - adult stem cells claimed to be potential substitutes for embryo stem cells.