Mediums - Are they exhibiting Multiple Personality Disorder?

Ashles

Pith Artist
Joined
Apr 28, 2003
Messages
8,694
Location
The '80s
As a follow up to Plinboe's post Psychics and inability to admit being wrong I thought I would ouline a little theory that occured to me.


Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) first really came to the world’s attention with the book (1973) and the film (1976, starring Sally Field) Sybil. (It is now referred to as Dissociative Identity Disorder but for the purposes of this post I’ll call it MPD)

In a nutshell, MPD consists of a sufferer having “at least one alter personality that controls behaviour” (Skepdic). These ‘alters’ can be different ages, of either sex, wildly differing in personality and there can be up to thousands of them in a single individual. For most sufferers they cannot remember what their alters do and have large memory gaps.

The method of treatment for this disorder has consisted of hypnosis and trying to get the alters to talk to each other. The theory is that the alters represent different parts of the person’s whole psyche.
Furthermore the theory adds that in most of these cases the fragmentation of the person’s unity of consciousness is due to severe childhood sexual abuse that has been repressed and totally forgotten by the sufferer.

There are several reasons this disorder might be interesting to sceptics.


Firstly there is the debate about the disorder itself.

One of the leading critics of MPD Nicholas P. Spanos suggests that:
Most cases of MPD are “rule-governed social constructions established, legitimated and maintained through social interaction”.

He believes (as do several other leading psychologists) that the disorder is almost completely created and encouraged by the therapists.

For example Sybil (real name Shirley Ardell Mason) is now known to have had no MPD symptoms before her sessions with therapist Cornelia Wilbur.
The historian who first revealed her real identity says that there is strong evidence that the worst of the abuse described by the book could not have happened.
Wilbur used hypnosis and other suggestive techniques in her therapy.
Dr. Herbert Spiegel (who treated Sybil when Wilbur was absent) was shocked to discover that when he was in sessions with Sybil she would ask him if he would like her to assume certain alters. He said she could if she wanted but she didn’t have to and she said if it was okay she’d prefer not to. But she added that Dr Wilbur liked her to do so.
Spiegel also claims that Wilbur suggested the personalities herself and used hypnosis and sodium pentothal to help Sybil adopt them.

This treatment appears to typify the training that therapists have been getting to treat MPD. Encourage the suffers to express their alters and encourage the alters to talk. The idea is that if all the parts of the person’s shattered identity are talking then they will be able to reunify.

However this doesn’t seem to work.

Many of the sufferers have grown to really like the alters and actively don’t want them to reunuify as losing these alters would be like “a little part of themselves dying”

Other problems:

There are very few reported cases of MPD afflicting children, despite the fact that this is when the alleged abuse happens.
Before the movie Sybil came out there had been 75 reported cases of MPD. Since the film – over 40,000.
The majority of sufferers tend to be of a highly suggestible personality type.
How come the person’s core personality can function perfectly normally when the alters are not present?
The founder of the International Society for the study of Dissociation (Dr Bennet Braun) had his licence suspended over allegations that, with the use of drugs and hypnosis he convinced a patient that she had killed scores of people (the quote from Sophia8’s sig come from this patient: “There was no way I could come from a little town in Iowa, be eating 2,000 people a year, and nobody said anything”)


Now all this is interesting in its own right (and there was a fascinating documentary on it last Sunday in the UK).


But here’s what really struck me:

It is a disorder in which sufferers (often highly suggestible people) are encouraged to develop other personalities and make them talk.

They are encouraged to describe these other personalities in detail to an observer.

They have been trained through experience to receive positive feedback from the observers based on the complexity of the alters, the duration of talking as the alter, and the wide number of alters produced.

They show great unwillingness to get rid of any of these personalities.

They enjoy the process of the ‘therapy’ and enjoy the expression of their alters.

Many of the alters are very childlike and stubborn.

The alters can listen to each other and talk to each other and the core personality.


I was reminded strongly of mediums (i.e. those mediums who really appear to believe in what they are doing – obviously not the blatantly fraudulent ones who are another case entirely).
I believe that mediums and psychics may be exhibiting a variant of MPD in which the alters are replaced by voices of the dead.


Another interesting thing about the process is that, if we liken the medium to the MPD sufferer and the person getting the reading to the therapist, then we have a patient-therapist dynamic in which both parties might be highly suggestible.

The rules for their sessions are strongly outlined and known by both parties beforehand (popular culture makes us all aware of what we could expect from a visit to a medium, whether we have visited one or not).

In the whole the person getting the reading is easily satisfied by information provided and is pleased simply by the emergence of an alternate personality – it reinforces belief in the process for both parties.

This relates interestingly to Psychologist Nicholas P. Spanos’ description of MPD involving “rule-governed social constructions established, legitimated and maintained through social interaction”

Mediums, like MPD sufferers, are fiercely protective of their alternate personalities, refusing to admit error or be questioned in an aggressive or probing way.

Mediums often say things like “I wish I didn’t have this gift” much as MPD sufferers claim to want to be free of the ‘disorder’, yet there appears very little effort by either to actively restrain the development of the disorder/ability.

Also, 85% of MPD sufferers are female. I would be very interested to see how this correlates to the gender ratio of mediums (whenever I search the Internet any medium lists seem to show about a 4:1 - 80% - ratio of female to male, but that is a very rough estimate).


I don’t want to make this initial post too long so I’ll stop there for the moment and see what everyone else thinks.
 
In a group environment psychics often appear to create random personalities until feedback from a specific person coalesces that personality into a recognisable identity.

If it is (for example) dad or grandfather then the personality the psychic displays is usually very generic.

If it is a private reading then a lot of information will be provided by the person having the reading. This allows the medium to form a personality based on specific offered information.

Remember, in these instances I am not talking about Hot reading, I am talking about people who might genuinely believe they have this ability.

This willl probably apply much more to the many readers who sit privately or with small groups, and is very unlikely to apply to celebrity readers or some of the famed regulars on the spiritualist church circuit.
 
For most sufferers they cannot remember what their alters do and have large memory gaps.

To my mind this lets out MPD right there. All mediums AFAIK can remember what their "guides" do, and don't have large memory gaps.

But hey, it was an interesting theory. :D
 
To my mind this lets out MPD right there. All mediums AFAIK can remember what their "guides" do, and don't have large memory gaps.
That's one of the reasons it might be a variant of MPD.

Also, in interviews I have seen with MPD sufferers they appear to able to describe an awful lot about their various alters. How could they do this if they didn't remember anything?

Remember the memory loss isn't from physical brain damage or neurochemical disorder, but entirely psychological in nature.
And this memory loss is reported by the sufferer. How much of it may actually be remembered but is 'forgotten' when reporting to the therapists? Remember the therapist rarely challenges the MPD sufferer.
(Also some of the alleged amnesia concerns the childhood sexual abuse, which may not actually have happened.)

The suggestion may be affecting this - the 'rules' for MPD are that there are memory gaps - but this rule isn't applied to psychic readings.
 
Many of the early psychical researchers believed that mediums were suffering from a disorder of this type (although it was not then known as MPD). For instance, Ms. Piper, subject of numerous investigations, claimed to be controlled by a French doctor. This doctor did not know many things about France, nor did he speak French very well at all. Similar personality changes were noted in a variety of other trance mediums who would take on completely different personalities. Rarely were these alter personalities taken at face value by the investigators.
 
I think that mediums could be said to have MPD - insofar as MPD is a social contruct and not an illness.
Most mediums have to go through training before they find their guides, and they socialise (and in some cases share houses or live in communities) with other mediums. So they 'learn' about being mediums from other mediums.
Also there are very few child mediums, which is surprising when you think about it. Aren't children supposed to be far more open to the spirit world than adults?
A medium's guide rarely manifests outside the setting of a seance or service, and rarely does or says anything that deviates from the 'script' of the setting. The 'spirits' that manifest are so predictable and limited as to be boring after a while - completely unlike real personalities. But the 'script' of the seance demands the appearence of spirits and guides, and then demands that they say/do certain things in particular ways.

Altogether, it's pretty obvious that mediums are playing a set role in their particular societal niche.
 

I think that mediums could be said to have MPD - insofar as MPD is a social contruct and not an illness.


Bravo!

This is very similar to what I was thinking, I have worked with a number of individuals who had been diagnosed with DID, they can't be mediums because of the extreme level of acting out that alters engage in. I think that they are 'constructs' of preconscious and conscious behaviors that people engage in under stress. They are really freaky to see, I think the best thing is to act as though the person is still there and just help them calm down, it is more like 'partial personality disorder', very similar to OCD in some ways.
 
In Joe Nickell's book "Real-Life X-Files", he talks of a study by Sheryl C. Willson and Theodore X. Barber on fantasy proneness. As suggested by thier research data "indivduals manifesting the fantasy-prone syndrome may have been overrepresented among famous mediums,psychics, and religious visionaries of the past". They used biographies of mystics to determine if people fit the fantasy-prone characteristics. They looked at several famous psychics and mediums of the past and they also had characteristics found in the fantasy-prone. Joe NIckell has been appyling thier methods to contemporary psychics and in each case he has found that they fit the fantasy -prone personality. He lists 14 specific characteristics that point to fantasy-proneness. Joe Nickell says that if someone posses 6 of these traits it points to a fantasy prone personality.
I love typing to people on forums that claim to have psychic abilites and in every case I have seen, these people do have at least 6 of the traits mentioned by Joe Nickell. Here is that list:
a. being an excellant hypnotic subject.
b. having imaginary playmates as achild
c. fanasizing frequently as a child
d. adopting a fantasy personality
e. experiencing imagined sennsations as real
f. having vivid sensory perceptions
g. reliving past experiences
h. claiming psychic powers
i. having out of body experiences.
j. recieving poems, messages,etc. from spirits, higher intelligences, and the like.
k. being involved in "healing"
l. encountering apparitions
m. experiencing hupnagogic hallucinations
n. seeing classic hypnagogic imagery (such as spirits or monsters from outer space.

By the way the book is a great read.

JPK
 
Damn, I think Sophia8 has summed it up rather more neatly and concisely than I did.:)

So, presumably, for any mediums who say "I don't want this gift" if they stop giving the readings the 'spirits' will go away.

JPK thanks for the recommendation - I intend to check that out.
 
Ashles said:
So, presumably, for any mediums who say "I don't want this gift" if they stop giving the readings the 'spirits' will go away.
I've just been reading "Hellish Nell", the biography of Helen Duncan, the medium who was charged under the Witchcraft Act in 1944. I recommend it - it's a very interesting read if you want to know how mediums operate.
Anyway, Duncan spent nine months in prison. During that time she didn't do any readings, didn't produce any ectoplasm or channel her guide, or produce any other mediumistic SFX. Which is curious - how better to prove her mediumship than in a prison cell, where there was no possibility of using hidden props or tricks?
In her case, it certainly looks as if "the spirits went away" when she couldn't do her regular seances.
 

Back
Top Bottom