• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mark's Interview with Ron

Thanks, Ron. People will notice that it didn't quite go as advertised, mostly because I had no conception of time, as usual. It's interesting because the subject later in the show was people who were confused about time.
 
Gravy said:
Thanks, Ron. People will notice that it didn't quite go as advertised, mostly because I had no conception of time, as usual. It's interesting because the subject later in the show was people who were confused about time.
Click to expand...

You must be reading my mind. I'm sitting here thinking that we're complaining that people in the buildings had no time sense, and I'm--once again! (my anecdote about the Thin Man film)--the most egregious offender. I claimed it took us seven minutes to get around to the topic, and it really took twelve. What can I say? I'm a hopeless dunce sometimes. I wonder how many times that line will get quoted?
 
~enigma~ said:
Do I get a prize for being first?
Click to expand...


Back in high school, a friend of mine raffled off a ham--two bits for a ticket. He pocketed about twelve bucks, then announced the winning number. The guy with the matching ticket asked for his ham. My friend informed him that there was no ham. The guy developed what ballplayers delicately describe as the "red ass", but my friend calmed him down and provided the proper perspective. He explained: "This was a game of chance. You took a chance and lost."
 
pomeroo said:
Back in high school, a friend of mine raffled off a ham--two bits for a ticket. He pocketed about twelve bucks, then announced the winning number. The guy with the matching ticket asked for his ham. My friend informed him that there was no ham. The guy developed what ballplayers delicately describe as the "red ass", but my friend calmed him down and provided the proper perspective. He explained: "This was a game of chance. You took a chance and lost."
Click to expand...
A simple no would suffice :)
 
Oops. I said Schroeder was with Engine Company 5. It was 10.
 
Gravy said:
Oops. I said Schroeder was with Engine Company 5. It was 10.
Click to expand...


I actually noticed that, but I lacked the cajones to correct you. The reason I remembered that it was Company 10 is that you mention it in your paper.
 
pomeroo said:
And there are people cynical enough to suspect that I planned the whole thing.
Click to expand...
You did...you never intended to award the prize so you purposely posted knowing I would quote you and win the prize which you knew I wouldn't accept since I don't eat ham....now that's my story and I'm sticking to it :)
 
~enigma~ said:
You did...you never intended to award the prize so you purposely posted knowing I would quote you and win the prize which you knew I wouldn't accept since I don't eat ham....now that's my story and I'm sticking to it :)
Click to expand...



I'd have to get up pretty damn early to sneak one past you.
 
Thank you, gentlemen, for posting the link. Another excellent show, very nicely done.

For those who are not particularly well versed in the events of 9/11 and for those who are not particularly well versed in the woo emanating from the Loose With the Truth crew, it might be a bit confusing, but for those of us who are well versed, it flowed very well.

The reality is that those who are neophytes to the "twoofers v. skeptics" debate require far more basic discussion than that which any of us here would wish to see, and televised discussions on such basic levels would be boring to most of us here. This isn't "Intro to Twooferism 101" so kudos to you, Mark and Ron, for a job very well done.

As an aside, yes, I noticed the engine 5 mistake, but it has already been addressed and it was no biggie.

Now, about that link to the call-in part of the show...looking forward to it.
 
Thanks for the link Ron! I look forward to watching this... right now :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom