Mark Cuban does not believe in Loose Change lies

ref

Master Poster
ref
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
2,685
This from The Dallas Morning News. James Ragland sent Mr. Cuban e-mails, trying to clarify the position of Mr. Cuban:

I also asked whether his association with the movie might lend credibility to the controversial way it connects the dots of its conspiracy theory?

"I don't believe the movie. Not at all," Mr. Cuban explained. "But I do believe that lies in the shadows are far more dangerous than lies you can confront and refute. There probably will be a movie that responds to this one, and we would be more than happy to distribute it as well, for the very same reason."
Click to expand...

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...agland_28met.ART0.State.Edition2.447e560.html

(Bolding mine)

Great news :) I wonder if Dylan knows this.
 
Funny how the only people who would distribute it are in disagreement with it. I sure do hope a rebuttal is made that also gets distribution. It would have to contain original content though.

Depends on the actual content of LCFC though.
 
Sounds like typical truther doubletalk to me. "I only want an investigation" in front of the media while they talk conspiracy crap to the flock.
 
Can someone with an LCF account post this info there? I would like to see their reaction :cool:
 
I guess this is why Dylan made refernce to "holding on to content."

I have a feeling the folks in California wanna get rid of some of the dumber stuff.
 
"There probably will be a movie that responds to this one, and we would be more than happy to distribute it as well, for the very same reason."
Click to expand...


Paging Screw Loose Change. There are millions of dollars waiting for you in the lobby!
 
Since almost every mention LC gets in the press includes at least one reference to the film's "throbbing beats", I'd like to suggest to anyone here who might participate in any rebuttal film that it should include throbbing beets. Perhaps in the credits. Preferably animated by The Amazing Mister Bickford.
 
Cuban didn't seem to give a real definitive answer. If he doesn't believe in it, then why be invovled with it? I wonder if Cuban knows about Screw Loose Change.
 
While I am reserving final judgement on where I THINK Cuban stands on 9/11 twoof, I can see the validity in what he claims to be doing.

As many of us have said here, to get this under the scrutiny of the MSM and real scientists will likely be the best thing to undo their silly sham.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
While I am reserving final judgement on where I THINK Cuban stands on 9/11 twoof, I can see the validity in what he claims to be doing.

As many of us have said here, to get this under the scrutiny of the MSM and real scientists will likely be the best thing to undo their silly sham.

TAM:)
Click to expand...
Plus he has the added incentive of making a few bucks along the way. :)
 
http://myspacewaiter.com/nph-proxy....m/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6382



lets face it, not everyone who gets involved in the truth movement is in it because they believe in it. There's a lot of names to be made in this, and a lot of money.
Click to expand...


Replace "not everyone" with "a lot of people" and you have the primal essence of the truth movement. That is why a lot of them are going on public access radio and making their own videos. They hope to strike it Alex Jones or, to a much lesser extent, Dylan Avery rich. Of course they don't realize, Roxdog and Mike Chambers for instance, that hosts who get paid the most do so because they are good. Sorry Roxy and Mike, you guys are decidedly not good. Heck, even merc claimed he called The View and begged them to invite him as a guest. They declined, of course. A lot of these guys are desperately yearning for the fastest route to fame and fortune. The definitive example is merc.
 
Last edited:
Check out, how the master of lies, Paul Joseph Watson presents this same issue in Prisonplanet.

"I happen to think we live in a city of smart and educated people who don't need anyone to censor for them," he said. "They can make up their own minds," states Cuban.

"I do believe that lies in the shadows are far more dangerous than lies you can confront and refute."
Click to expand...

He conviniently left out the part, which says Cuban does not belive in Loose Change. That changes the meaning of his selected quotes completely, because the reader cannot know, that Cuban was referring to the lies of Loose Change. Hey fencesitters, this is how the Truthers deceive you.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/290307cubanresolute.htm
 
Last edited:
The Demon's Head said:
Cuban didn't seem to give a real definitive answer. If he doesn't believe in it, then why be invovled with it? I wonder if Cuban knows about Screw Loose Change.
Click to expand...

I don't know if Cuban knows about Screw Loose Change but the writer of the article cited certainly does, as he mentioned it by name :)

Still, it does seems odd that the LC crew would want their video - which purports to be a documentary - affiliated with someone who "[does not] believe the movie. Not at all."
 
ref said:
Check out, how the master of lies, Paul Joseph Watson presents this same issue in Prisonplanet.



He conviniently left out the part, which says Cuban does not belive in Loose Change. That changes the meaning of his selected quotes completely, because the reader cannot know, that Cuban was referring to the lies of Loose Change. Hey fencesitters, this is how the Truthers deceive you.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/290307cubanresolute.htm
Click to expand...

This kind of deceitfulness is, unfortunately, entirely typical of the 9/11 conspiracy websites and is rampant in the inaptly named "truth movement".
 
LashL said:
I don't know if Cuban knows about Screw Loose Change but the writer of the article cited certainly does, as he mentioned it by name :)

Still, it does seems odd that the LC crew would want their video - which purports to be a documentary - affiliated with someone who "[does not] believe the movie. Not at all."
Click to expand...

Maybe because nobody else was willing to gamble that it could make a profit?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom