• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
First post. Universalseed.org!!! LOL

edit: Beaten. Dammit!!!
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Surely there've been bigger threads than this series... right?
Click to expand...
Don't think so. I reckon these threads even outdo the "Carlos Swett Affair" (which was also related to 9/11 of course).

Hmm, I wonder where Carlos/latinjral is now? What if he were to post his "paranormal hat" video over at the Loose Change forum?
Might be worth a laugh ...
 
I was going to suggest that the old thread be ended and an new, generic 9/11 thread begun, but I guess that'll have to wait for another 5,000 posts.
 
Gravy said:
I was going to suggest that the old thread be ended and an new, generic 9/11 thread begun, but I guess that'll have to wait for another 5,000 posts.
Click to expand...
I wonder whether its time for a conspiracy theory subforum. Strictly speaking this thread should be dozens of smaller threads but General Skepticism and the Paranormal isn't quite the place.
 
Good suggestion, try floating the idea in Community or Forum Management and see what the feedback is.
 
The first three threads contain 11,405 posts.

So trailing behind three word story, and barely half of Top Ten List Challenge.

Pretty impressive for a "3%" thread, though!
 
Bindamel said:
The first three threads contain 11,405 posts.

So trailing behind three word story, and barely half of Top Ten List Challenge.

Pretty impressive for a "3%" thread, though!
Click to expand...
and behind The REAL Spawn of "The Thread That Will Not Die"! (currently at 15,921) - but I wasn't thinking of fun threads. I still reckon that Loose Change Parts 1 to IV is the longest on a substantive issue.
 
How do you determine when a new thread should be started? Is there a limit on each size?

-Andrew
 
The thread that wil not die is also years old. How old it this trail? Six months?
 
Darat said:
Are you suggesting that this consipracy theory will never die.... Nooooooo!!
Click to expand...


Good CTs don't die... they just fade away...

(to be brought back up as supporting evidence for the NEXT CT - see JFK)

-Andrew
 
gumboot said:
How do you determine when a new thread should be started? Is there a limit on each size?

-Andrew
Click to expand...

The first "close and split" came about because there was a "natural point" in the discussion where a break seemed sensible - since then it's normally been when someone has reminded me (thanks Regnad Kcin) that once again the beast has grown rather large.
 
Darat said:
The first "close and split" came about because there was a "natural point" in the discussion where a break seemed sensible - since then it's normally been when someone has reminded me (thanks Regnad Kcin) that once again the beast has grown rather large.
Click to expand...


Gotcha... keep up the good work...:cool:

:kiwibird:
-Andrew

P.S. I always rather liked your avatar by the way...
 
Something to annoy Chuck Sheen with.

lolsheepfn1.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom