• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change Final Cut Details

Brainster

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
21,947
Dylan called into Alex Jones' show on Thursday and gave some details:

"I can't go into too much detail now, but we're going to be in theatres in 2007 no matter what. If I had to put an estimate on it, it's probably going to be Spring... we're sticking to hard evidence, we're bringing up the ISI connection, Norman Mineta's testimony, we've already got an interview with Ray McGovern..."

I'm flabbergasted that they are bringing in the ISI thing; how do you claim that Atta got a bunch of money from Pakistan to pull off 9-11 and yet deny 19 Muslim hijackers? Mineta we all know where they're going; shoot-down orders become stand-down orders because the only logical thing was to shoot down the planes and therefore the insistence by the military on repetition of the orders from Cheney could only mean that they were being told not to shoot down the plane(s).

Do-Over Dylan also laughs at those of us who've debunked V2:

"That's why when I get all these attack pages or people criticizing us for what we say in the Second Edition, it doesn't even bother me, because things that I suggest in the Second Edition are merely that, they're just suggestions, and when the Final Cut drops in theatres, these people are going to have nothing to say to us, because we're sticking to all the things that we can prove."

Ah, yes, he just suggested that perhaps Flight 93 landed at Cleveland and that the phone calls were fake, no doubt about it. And when the Final Cut appears it better have tons of things these idiots can't prove or their fans are going to be awfully disappointed.
 
Last edited:
I hope they actually step over the line and say it so some families can sue them and take away their profits before they cut and run.

A fiction film farce to a proof of real idiots do exist.
 
It will be the most examined movie ever ... ever.
Zapruder??? PAH! :D And i will spend no money
for it, that´s for sure. :popcorn2
 
LOL

Oh man, this should get interesting. Hasn't damn near everything they've suggested/hypothicised/guessed at already been completely blown out of the water?

I'd like to smack that guy upside the head
 
Ummm, are they still planning to use copyrighted footage without permission? How well is that one going to fly?
 
They'll probably use the interviews with prominent CTers they've already filmed. By getting other people to make the charges, they can always say they didn't say anything. Expect an ending asking the audience to ask questions for the sake of the victim.
 
Things they will have to eliminate from the FC, to fit what Dylan has said (only things they can prove):

1. No plane hit the pentagon theory
2. Controlled Demolition theory for WTC1/2/7
3. Billions of Gold in WTC as motive theory
4. No plane crashed in shanksville theory
5. hijackers are still alive theory

I mean I could go on.

FC:2e was pretty watered down compared to the earlier versions. I think the new film will be the biggest pile of vague inuendo dung we have ever seen, and nothing more.

TAM
 

Back
Top Bottom