Vortigern99
Sorcerer Supreme
From http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Glob...-monster-is-real-former-Scottish-police-chief -- among other sites reporting this so-called "news". (As of this post, "Loch Ness" is trending #3 on yahoo's front page.)
Loren Coleman is being quoted as "a leading experts [sic] on mythic animals" by claiming that:
There are so many logical fallacies here I'm uncertain where to begin. The first that springs to mind is appeal to authority. "A policeman in the 1930s believed Nessie was a real animal = evidence that Nessie is a real animal." What other baloney can we detect in this breathless, credulous journalism?
Newly publicized documents reveal that a former Scottish police chief believed that the existence of the Loch Ness monster was “beyond doubt” but its protection could not be ensured.
Loren Coleman is being quoted as "a leading experts [sic] on mythic animals" by claiming that:
“The Scottish government has long been interested in protecting Nessie,” says Loren Coleman, who is co-author of The Field Guide to Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents, and Other Mystery Denizens of the Deep. “This just reinforces this whole notion (that) the officials in Scotland take this creature very seriously.”
...
“There’s always been the sense that quietly…they were taking the reports more validly. There was a serious acknowledgment that the Loch Ness monster exists,” says Coleman.
There are so many logical fallacies here I'm uncertain where to begin. The first that springs to mind is appeal to authority. "A policeman in the 1930s believed Nessie was a real animal = evidence that Nessie is a real animal." What other baloney can we detect in this breathless, credulous journalism?
Last edited: