It would help a lot if you could identify which pages and figures in the report show iron-rich microspheres, and how it's relevant to Harrit/Jones.
Sorry but that is just one of the reports I had read I have been fact checking everything
It appears all kaolin clays have some pyrite contamination so all paints with Kaolin clays should form micro spheres even the ones Harrit & Jones burned.
Page 15,
"to ferric pathway for oxidative weathering of ilmenite, which involves a progressive
removal of ferrous Fe by leaching, leaving behind rutile as the end product. During the
above process pseudorutile was found to be the intermediate product. Gray kaolins
generally contain significant amounts of sulfides and organic matter and the coloration is
due to the minor amounts of phases such as pyrite, marcasite, ferrous silicates and
kerogen. They remain intact in the reduced conditions underneath as long as they are less
chemically disturbed (White et al., l99l).This phenomenon is similar to that observed in
soils. Many researchers (Dudas et al, 1988; Evangelou and Zhang, 1995; Lumsdon et al,
2001) have studied the geochemistry of acid sulfate soils ie., soils derived from pyrite
parent materials (Fanning and Fanning, 1989) are strongly influenced by the iron and
sulfur weathering products (Lumsdon etal., 2001) and the common secondary minerals
formed from the weathering of pyrite are iron oxides (eg.,goethite and ferrihydrite) and
iron sulfates (iarosite).
1.5 Optical properties of kaolin
The optical properties pertinent to white minerals including kaolin are brightness,"
All kaolin clays contain the basic ingredients for forming iron microspheres, so any paint should by
Nature form them.