• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Lloyd England: Eye of the Storm

TheLoneBedouin

Banned
T
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
733
eyeofstormtitle.jpg


At least a few members of this forum may have wondered what it would be like if CIT met up with the taxicab driver Lloyde England after having put out their first documentary outlining how the north side evidence implicates Lloyde as an accomplice to the 9/11 operation.

Your wonders will cease to exist.

When CIT went to Arlington this past June to independently confirm and video tape the north side approach witnesses from Arlington Cemetery who were initially and officially recorded by the Center for Military History in the first weeks after the event, they also visited Lloyde.

Lloyde ended up inviting CIT back into his home for a follow-up interview, brought them to a neighbor's house to get independent unreleased photos of the cab from 9/11, and went on a road trip to his 30 acres of property in the country where the original cab has been stored under a tarp preserved as it was left from 9/11.

The detailed encounter has been fully documented with audio and video recordings and Lloyde's new wife, Shirley Hughes, who married him after 9/11 and has worked for the FBI ever since, actually adds her thoughts to the discussion.

Watch video here

cabsign.jpg

Picture036.jpg
 
stupid 9/11 ideas, exposed on video. How dumb do you have to be to be in CIT? How much ignorance is required to push CIT idiot ideas?

Will CIT stop making up fantasy ideas? Lyte proves he is the worst investigator in the world; again.
Does TLB beleive this junk?

Military deception statement = a dolt on 9/11.

pure stupid - I have to say this is the dumbest group of investigators in the world. Anyone have a complaint with this fact?
Failed education? Drugs? Paranoia? What makes CIT so stupid?

CIT stands for what? Criminally Insane Tolts? (total dolts) - Sorry for being as bad in my post as CIT is in the interview, but I watched it, it is bad! But the bad I need to describe the CIT interview has not been defined.
 
Last edited:
Thier whole argument against Lloyd is a argument from incredulity.

They can't seem to understand how a section of a pole can crash through a windshield and lodge it's tip into the backseat and rest on the dashboard without scratching the hood of the car.

Apparently they never seen arrows fly through the air. Isin't it amazing how an arrow can hit a target and remain standing with only it's tip sticking in the target without scratching the rest of the target?


I can't wait to see his drawing that renders calculations moot.
 
Great interview of Lloyde England guys

TheLoneBedouin said:
When CIT went to Arlington this past June to independently confirm and video tape the north side approach witnesses from Arlington Cemetery who were initially and officially recorded by the Center for Military History in the first weeks after the event, they also visited Lloyde.

Lloyde ended up inviting CIT back into his home for a follow-up interview, brought them to a neighbor's house to get independent unreleased photos of the cab from 9/11, and went on a road trip to his 30 acres of property in the country where the original cab has been stored under a tarp preserved as it was left from 9/11.

The detailed encounter has been fully documented with audio and video recordings and Lloyde's new wife, Shirley Hughes, who married him after 9/11 and has worked for the FBI ever since, actually adds her thoughts to the discussion.
Click to expand...
That is a great interview. Thank you for posting it. Lloyde sure seems in good health, and seemed quite willing to be interviewed.

I always wondered about those photos of the taxicab and Lloyde England taken before the Pentagon roof collapse. They seemed to be posed very carefully by the FBI/Secret Service agents guarding the taxicab, with Lloyde very obediently standing at parade rest at all times. How come this old man, who had just allegedly very narrowly escaped with his life, whose wife Shirley worked for the FBI, and who allegedly had just struggled with, and had a 200 some odd pound and 30 some odd foot long pole fall on him, was not taken elsewhere for observation or treatment, or at least allowed to sit down somewhere and rest? How come this tired and frightened old man was so cruelly used for photo ops?

In this new interview, poor Lloyde obviously understands that his original tale will not work, so he tries to move himself and his taxicab down the road and over to the now PROVEN decoy aircraft flight path Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo, even though all the photos and videos taken on 9-11-2001 trap him on the south side of the Hwy 27 overpass where no aircraft ever did fly and no aircraft ever did knock down the five light poles.

Maybe Lloyde England watched the recently released (9-12-2008) FAA mpg video showing the actual flight path Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo, and thought "Uhh Ohhh. Now the Federal agencies are abandoning the Fairy tale."

Or perhaps Lloyde's wife picked up a copy of the Arlington National Cemetery eyewitness accounts produced by the Citizen Investigation Team, (those were just great) at FBI Headquarters and they watched them together at home. Isn't it great to know for sure where the flight path really was? A very interesting video interview.

Nice job guys. That was better than the Hollywood productions these big bucks MSM journalists come up with, and you guys are giving this out for free.
 
I hope Lloyd sues the crap out of them.

Poor guy doesn't seem to know that CIT accuses him of being an accomplice.
 
SPreston said:
That is a great interview. Thank you for posting it. Lloyde sure seems in good health, and seemed quite willing to be interviewed.

I always wondered about those photos of the taxicab and Lloyde England taken before the Pentagon roof collapse. They seemed to be posed very carefully by the FBI/Secret Service agents guarding the taxicab, with Lloyde very obediently standing at parade rest at all times. How come this old man, who had just allegedly very narrowly escaped with his life, whose wife Shirley worked for the FBI, and who allegedly had just struggled with, and had a 200 some odd pound and 30 some odd foot long pole fall on him, was not taken elsewhere for observation or treatment, or at least allowed to sit down somewhere and rest? How come this tired and frightened old man was so cruelly used for photo ops?

In this new interview, poor Lloyde obviously understands that his original tale will not work, so he tries to move himself and his taxicab down the road and over to the now PROVEN decoy aircraft flight path Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo, even though all the photos and videos taken on 9-11-2001 trap him on the south side of the Hwy 27 overpass where no aircraft ever did fly and no aircraft ever did knock down the five light poles.

Maybe Lloyde England watched the recently released (9-12-2008) FAA mpg video showing the actual flight path Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo, and thought "Uhh Ohhh. Now the Federal agencies are abandoning the Fairy tale."

Or perhaps Lloyde's wife picked up a copy of the Arlington National Cemetery eyewitness accounts produced by the Citizen Investigation Team, (those were just great) at FBI Headquarters and they watched them together at home. Isn't it great to know for sure where the flight path really was? A very interesting video interview.

Nice job guys. That was better than the Hollywood productions these big bucks MSM journalists come up with, and you guys are giving this out for free.
Click to expand...
77CrashTestBreakaway.jpg

Breakaway lamppost, wow, way too heavy to move by hand! lol, how dumb do you have to be to believe CIT tripe?


CIT are the worse investigators; why? Is it the lies or the fantasy ideas? Or claims the military are behind 9/11? Why are liars like you and 9/11 truth dolts like CIT such pathetic terrorist apologists? Why do you get everything wrong?

Read the final FDR heading for over 20 seconds does not vary more than a degree from the final impact heading of 70 degree magnetic. You can apply drift for that day's winds and get, also what was recorded on the FDR (i.e. hard evidence not lies from idiots at CIT) of 61.2 True Track. Makes your post false information due to lack of research and understanding. Major traits of 9/11 truth.

This makes your apology efforts for the terrorists just pathetic false information. The anti-intellectual CIT efforts are so bad, why are you fooled by such idiots?

Your ignorance on the flight path is exposed by your own post. Another trait of 9/11 truth, self refuting statements. Not even as good as 1930s NAZIs at misleading the masses, 9/11 truth fails again! With CIT there is no doubt, total failure is the end game.
 
Last edited:
Yawn....so Craig comes back to pimp his latest video? Perhaps he could answer this before retreating back to the CITfort:

Why would Lloyd have to be involved?

CIT thinks that the military carried out the biggest conspiracy of all time ...fooling hundreds of people into believing that an airplane hit the pentagon when it actually missed.....yet they couldn't fool a single old man into believing that the plane knocked a light pole into his car?!
 
"Eye of the Storm." Heh. Man, I'd hate to be at the eye of a storm of meaningless words and occasional claps of thunderous and threatening accusations. Oooh, a storm. Nice twirl effect.

uruk said:
Thier whole argument against Lloyd is a argument from incredulity.

They can't seem to understand how a section of a pole can crash through a windshield and lodge it's tip into the backseat and rest on the dashboard without scratching the hood of the car.
Click to expand...

Even giving them the benefit of the doubt - say, for example, that really is as impossible as they say - they only get one possible explanation for his wrong story. he's in on it! Not that he embellished a memory due to whatever brain and trauma problems, and seeing pictures later of the big pole there. Never would he make that up because it's just more dramatic, or to get attention. Nope! Definitely the first known accomplice (?) to mass murder. Was this witness simply fooled by unexplained trickery? No way! Tricking honest witneesses into thinking the plane crashed is fine, but to remember something wrong about the dang light poles, treasonous liar who "knows he's caught" and has "repercussion" at his 'doorstep," etc...

Stupid, stupid. I'll watch the video later. maybe it has a clue to my hunch on why Lloyd hasn't sued yet. It seems unlikely to me to run with this kind of accusatory performance without first signing some kind of MOU with the accused... they get a budget for this kind of thing? So yeah, now I'm suspecting Lloyd is "in on it!"
 
How come CIT is so important to you?

beachnut said:
stupid 9/11 ideas, exposed on video. How dumb do you have to be to be in CIT? How much ignorance is required to push CIT idiot ideas?

Will CIT stop making up fantasy ideas? Lyte proves he is the worst investigator in the world; again.
Does TLB beleive this junk?

Military deception statement = a dolt on 9/11.

pure stupid - I have to say this is the dumbest group of investigators in the world. Anyone have a complaint with this fact?
Failed education? Drugs? Paranoia? What makes CIT so stupid?

CIT stands for what? Criminally Insane Tolts? (total dolts) - Sorry for being as bad in my post as CIT is in the interview, but I watched it, it is bad! But the bad I need to describe the CIT interview has not been defined.
Click to expand...
My oh my. Why all this excitement, anger, and unnecessary stress on your heart? As a self-described philosopher, genius, and expert psychoanalyst, you are surely too brilliant to waste your valuable time following after this Citizen Investigation Team which you despise so much, and which your brothers-in-arms and you have declared are getting absolutely nowhere with their efforts at awakening the American people. Why would anyone chase after inept dolts, constantly worrying about what they are up to?

Don't you have anything better to do? And if they are criminally insane, wouldn't it be wise to keep your distance? They don't seem to be adjusting their plans according to your raging, so perhaps you should try something else? Sweet talk works sometimes or perhaps a few compliments.
 
First thought:

Ummm... TLB, you are aware that Lloyd corroborates here Lagasse's placement of the poles and the cab, correct? How can you guys ignore corroborated testimony that casts doubt on the officially-accepted photographic record that places this all on the official path? Why aren't you arguing that Lloyd supports the north path?

You're pretty sure he's lying here, right? Not suffering from malleable memory? As your buddies show him what "all the other witnesses" have said?
 
CIT has a habit of just jumping from one focal point to another when they've been cornered about whatever they're currently preaching. This is the same old tired routine with a slightly different backbeat.

Still no flight path or hard evidence to back up anything they believe in.

Oh, just a note SPreston - you can't post images until you make a certain number of posts here (i forget the #). I do know how you love to spice things up with the same images scattered throughout your posts over and over again.
 
Ohhhhh, we have Spreston here! Awesome! That makes two CIT sheep spamming the forum with CIT's lies.

He came to the den of the Government Apologists. Golly!

Anyhow, tell your masters that their silly little video is the finest example of argument from "incredully" as Craig calls it that I have ever seen. In other words, it is as pathetic as their other work. Anyway, tell Craig and fat Aldo my challenge is still open:

"while I’ve got your attention, can you kindly provide the flight path and calculations for the CIT Flight path please? You know the one, descent over the annex, bank North of Citgo, pull out of the bank and the descent and up and over the impact site at the Pentagon. Thanks, Buddy. Good luck with your diet!"

I see the thugs can defame a cab driver, can those thugs do Math?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom