List me some low glycemic foods!

kittynh

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
22,634
the teachers at school are ofcourse all over the newest "fad" in dieting. Low glycemic foods. Problem is, no one can list more than 2...

sigh...

so anyone got a list for the next diet no one will lose any weight on?
 
I wouldn't call it a fad exactly I first heard of it in 1998. It isn't exactly a miracle diet either. It is called glycemic index and you can do a google to find a list on the web... http://www.google.com/
 
cool!

The teachers have done the Atkins thing....

actually worked well for 2 of them!

I had no clue what glycemic meant!
 
Paper ?
Toenails ?
Glue ?
Hair ?
Chewing gum ?
Water ?
Expanded Polystyrene ?
 
This guy has probably said more on gi than most people would care to know, and in a very comprehensible way: Mendosa. And here is his list with more than 2 foods.
 
Low glycemic dieting is usually associated with the South Beach Diet instead of Atkins, but they're almost the same thing. It's basically all about how a given food affects the blood sugar level. The higher the glycemic rating, the faster your blood sugar spikes.

Some foods with a low and/or acceptable glycemic rating:

Almonds, Cashews, Walnuts
Cheese in general
Animal protein - fish, steak, eggs, etc.
Green veggies, such as broccoli, asparagas, etc.

The South Beach Diet allows you to eat certain items that are considered to be at a higher glycemic content, as long as you abide by certain rules - such as "Apples must be eaten with skins", which slows down absorbtion of sugars,etc.

Bad stuff - obviously, cane sugar, but also anything with simple sugars, such as starchy foods like pasta and bagels. You can eat a limited amount of pasta on the diet... but it has to be limited and you have to eat protein before eating the pasta. (This slows down the break-down of the starch in the pasta, keeping the blood sugar more stable.)

Atkins moderates the blood sugar spiking by eliminating "carbs" - which are starches, sugars, etc. Like I said, they're close....
 
kittynh said:
the teachers at school are ofcourse all over the newest "fad" in dieting. Low glycemic foods. Problem is, no one can list more than 2...

sigh...

so anyone got a list for the next diet no one will lose any weight on?
Dust!

(needs Real Player)
 
jmercer said:
Low glycemic dieting is usually associated with the South Beach Diet.

It shouldn't.

jmercer said:
Some foods with a low and/or acceptable glycemic rating:

Generally the gi is meaningful only for carbs, since fats and protein are invariably low (or even zero) gi.

jmercer said:
The South Beach Diet allows you to eat certain items that are considered to be at a higher glycemic content, as long as you abide by certain rules - such as "Apples must be eaten with skins", which slows down absorbtion of sugars,etc.

It doesn't really matter. Read the links I provided above. There is no significant change of gi no matter what else you eat with the food in question.

jmercer said:
Bad stuff - obviously, cane sugar, but also anything with simple sugars, such as starchy foods like pasta and bagels.

There is no satisfactory correlation of carb complexity to gi. There are simple carbs with low gi and complex carbs with high gi.

jmercer said:
Atkins moderates the blood sugar spiking by eliminating "carbs" - which are starches, sugars, etc. Like I said, they're close....

Yeah, well... all these diets are based on the hypothesis that low blood sugar (caused by insulin spikes following sugar spikes) will increase hunger. The problem is that this is only a minor contributor to the overall feeling of hunger. Unfortunately for all diet inventors, the main factor that affects hunger is very simple: The amount of calories ingested.
 
I got a better gi brand of spaghetti. I love spaghetti.

Now I gotta figure out which kind of rice. I like rice...

we are doing a pot luck dinner at school, so I need something to take!
 
jmercer said:
Heh - don't shoot me, I'm just the messenger. :)

Ok, no shooting! :k:

:D

On a side note, at the end of this page you will see that "Atkins nutritionists" seem to "forget" that sugar alcohols present on their "carb-free" bars can also have an effect on gi...
 
El Greco said:
Unfortunately for all diet inventors, the main factor that affects hunger is very simple: The amount of calories ingested.

There is another factor which is can be controlled which does contribute significantly to your appetite, and that's sleep. People who are sleep deprived generally have enhanced appetites. So if you want to lose weight, make sure you're getting enough sleep. Plus, it's good for you anyways.
 
El Greco said:
This guy has probably said more on gi than most people would care to know, and in a very comprehensible way: Mendosa. And here is his list with more than 2 foods.

Thanks for this. Though I'm not diabetic any more, I maintain a morbid fascination with this kind of stuff.

What's interesting about this list is that the number seem to be all over the place. It isn't uncommon to see numbers for the same item differ by a factor of two or more (cooked carrots differ by a factor of three). Also, there are a number of counterintuitive statements. Betty Crocker chocolate cake with frosting has a lower GI than a smaller serving of banana cake made without sugar; whole wheat spaghetti isn't any better than white spaghetti; Turkish noodle soup has practically nothing; and baked potatos have a lower GI than broad beans.

I think I'm going to go on the "grain of salt" diet.
 
epepke said:
Also, there are a number of counterintuitive statements.

If you find this stuff exciting (and have nothing better to do with your time), you can try to make your own, personalized gi measurements with a simple blood glucose monitor. You have to ingest 50gr of a carbohydrate and then measure blood glucose 3-4 times during the next 2 hours period (I have the exact protocol somewhere). You have to try to keep all other parameters as stable as possible (eg. hydration, glycogen depletion, exercise, etc). I've experimented with a few foods several years ago and the results were pretty much as expected. But it may be useful for a diabetic to test a particular food cooked in a special way.
 
What's hot at the moment is glycemic load based diets, these are worked out by looking at the effects an average portion would have on blood sugar. Horray!! Fad dieting has caught up with common sense! It wont last.
 
IMHO, for your average person, all those special diets are crap.

Get a copy of the Canada Food Guide (or whatever it is for your country), drink water, and exercise.

Who wants to spend their life worrying about how many carbs are in an apple?
 

Back
Top Bottom