• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lies of Kevin Ryan worlds most dishonest waterboy

~enigma~

Banned
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
7,923
Lies of Kevin Ryan - worlds most dishonest waterboy

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=718236659434732032&q=kevin+ryan#52m14s

Larry Silverstein, leaseholder for all three buildings -- "I said...maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And [the fire department commander and I] made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." -- PBS, 2002

How nice that the man that is considered the biggest wistleblower for the woowoos lies about Silverstein and the fire commander of the FDNY.

How can such an educated person do such stupid stuff, that is beyond me.

if I were either Larry Silverstein or the creator of the PBS documentary where the waterboy butchered a quote for his own purpose, he would be sued so bad his grandchildren would be paying off until the were in their 80s.
 
Last edited:
i cant see the video (net restirctions at work) is this the quote ryan used?

Larry Silverstein, leaseholder for all three buildings -- "I said...maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And [the fire department commander and I] made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." -- PBS, 2002

that seems an oddly blatant alteration even for a CTer
 
i cant see the video (net restirctions at work) is this the quote ryan used?



that seems an oddly blatant alteration even for a CTer
Yes, he used that exact quote. I am totally shocked that he did that and I am even more shocked he hasn't heard from a lawyer yet.
 
If you watch the whole video, it will make you very frustrated. On every single bullet point that he has it can be easily debunked. He is just using the classic confuse and deveive tactics. Its so annoying.
 
If you watch the whole video, it will make you very frustrated. On every single bullet point that he has it can be easily debunked. He is just using the classic confuse and deveive tactics. Its so annoying.
I hate to admit it but watching this kept me rapt (sort of like watching a train wreck) and I really understood why James Randi gets so incenced over flim flam artists. The only saving grace was that I find his gap toothed grin reminds me of a chipmunk.
 
What? None of the current crop of resident troofers (and socks) weighing in on such blatant dishonesty by the guy they currently exalt as one of their "professional" or "expert" troofers?

Well, colour me shocked. :rolleyes:
 
SSDD.

Easily debunked since every single point he purports to make has been debunked before, but even more painful because he brings absolutely nothing to the table, and merely parrots conspiracy sites without bothering to educate himself about even the most basic facts. So, it's not only boring and predictable, but also utterly pathetic and lame, in keeping with a below average teenager who just wandered into CT nonsense inadvertently.

No wonder the resident troofers aren't leaping to his defence.
 
Last edited:
What? None of the current crop of resident troofers (and socks) weighing in on such blatant dishonesty by the guy they currently exalt as one of their "professional" or "expert" troofers?

Well, colour me shocked. :rolleyes:
They can't defend him. Anyway alot of the woowoos are over at Abby's blog having hissy fits because she posted a peanutbutter jellytime video.
 
They can't defend him. Anyway alot of the woowoos are over at Abby's blog having hissy fits because she posted a peanutbutter jellytime video.

Oh, it goes without saying that they can't defend him. His dishonesty is so blatant.

The point I was trying to make is that they know that full well but they won't even weigh in on how wrong and how dishonest he is. For self proclaimed "truthseekers", they sure don't seem to be interested in actual truth at all.

No surprise, that.
 
Oh, it goes without saying that they can't defend him. His dishonesty is so blatant.

The point I was trying to make is that they know that full well but they won't even weigh in on how wrong and how dishonest he is. For self proclaimed "truthseekers", they sure don't seem to be interested in actual truth at all.

No surprise, that.
They seek truth? Wouldn't a good first step be reading a book? Do you remember the acronym RIF? Maybe we should teach the woowoos :)
 
What is the problem with the quote that you're talking about? Is it that Ryan substituted "they" with "[the fire department commander and I]"? That doesn't seem like anything that could merit a lawsuit.
 
What is the problem with the quote that you're talking about? Is it that Ryan substituted "they" with "[the fire department commander and I]"? That doesn't seem like anything that could merit a lawsuit.
Ryan also says: "Larry Silverstein essentially admitted demolishing the building".
 
What is the problem with the quote that you're talking about? Is it that Ryan substituted "they" with "[the fire department commander and I]"? That doesn't seem like anything that could merit a lawsuit.
Saying they and having it changed to implicate the speaker by name isn't illegal?
 

Back
Top Bottom