Liberation of Kuwait

Tmy

Philosopher
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
6,487
Did the coalition have any Iraqi type problems after liberating Kuwait? We still have a military presence in Kuwait. Are the locals there cool with that?

Why the big difference tween the reaction in Iraq vs. the reation in Kuwait.
 
10+ years more of brewing anit-western hate.

Improved pedestrian communications to get the word out.

9-11 was probably a big confidence boost.
 
Well, Kuwait was liberated from an invading force. Iraq was liberated from a dictator who had a loyal following from the Sunni minority.

If you look at northern Iraq, its practically self governing. In fact, we could rope it off and call our job done in that region. However, political reasons keep us from doing so with Turkey and the rest of Iraq. We need the Kurdish state to balance out the Shia majority of Iraq.

Now, there have been problem in the Shia portion of Iraq. This is no surprise since the Shia have a large fanatic fringe. However, the problems in southern Iraq aren't nearly as bad as the resistance from the Sunni triangle.

Basically, we through the baathists out of power. The siege of Fallujah is probably the best thing to happen since the fall of Baghdad since we have killed thousands of militants who would fight against a republic.
 
Speaking of the Kurds (and the US need for help in the reason) are they in a position to lend a hand, or would that be too politically incorrect in the region?

Sorry to derail.
 
Tmy said:
Did the coalition have any Iraqi type problems after liberating Kuwait? We still have a military presence in Kuwait. Are the locals there cool with that?

Why the big difference tween the reaction in Iraq vs. the reation in Kuwait.
Remember how Bush I exhorted the Shiites in the south, as well as the Republican Guard, to rise up against Sadam Hussein, and not only refused to allow rebelling Republican Guards access to weaponry, but also allowed Hussein loyalists through restricted airspace to put down the Shiite uprising? I guess that wouldn't elicit a great deal of trust or confidence from these people for US forces second time round.
 
c0rbin said:
Speaking of the Kurds (and the US need for help in the reason) are they in a position to lend a hand, or would that be too politically incorrect in the region?

Sorry to derail.
IIRC, the sensitivity of the situation between Iraqi Kurds and Turkey is too delicate to risk military help from either in the rest of Iraq. And I don't imagine there would be much love lost between the Kurds and the Sunnis considering the latter's traditional (but not exclusive) support for the Ba'ath party.
 
Tmy said:
Did the coalition have any Iraqi type problems after liberating Kuwait? We still have a military presence in Kuwait. Are the locals there cool with that?

Why the big difference tween the reaction in Iraq vs. the reation in Kuwait.

Because the Kuwaitis asked (and even paid) for our interference.
 
I believe that there was less trouble with the Kuwait expedition because the U.S. put back into power a pre-existing government rather than create a new one.
 

Back
Top Bottom