one thing that really bothers me abut the 9-11 denial movemant is this focus on larry silverstein. the accusation, is that he bought the wtc, rigged them with explosiives, blew them up, and is now reaping untold insurance fortunes from the disaster.
to me..this is the greatest accusation of "jewish lightning" ever conceived. jewish lightning is the cocept that jewish landlords in crappy nyc neighborhoods purposefully set their buildings ablaze as to get the insurance money.
and thats basically what we have been accused here. evil zionist silverstein, buys property only to destroy it, because its not making any money, has to be cleaned of asbestos, and maybe he even wants to snuff out a few gentile lives in the process.
why the 9-11 denial movemant does not see the terribly inherent anti-semitism in this whole argument is striking, and very disapointing.
but the fact is, after the 1993 bombing, it would have been terribly foolish NOT to have a huge terrorism stipulation in any insurance of the wtc.
the fact is...the wtc was indeed making money and rebounded from a slump in the mid- 1990's
the fact is larry silverstein actually had to pay rent for the wtc, even after it was destroyed, if he wanted to rebuild.
the fact is, even with the insurance money, with the wtc rebuilt, silverstein will not have made a fortune from the insurance.
and the fact is..if larry made a decision with the FDNY to "pull it"...meaning to collapse the building...that would make the FDNY conspirators in the destruction of the wtc. maybe the 9-11 deniars should think about that before they go accusing people of mass murder.
to me..this is the greatest accusation of "jewish lightning" ever conceived. jewish lightning is the cocept that jewish landlords in crappy nyc neighborhoods purposefully set their buildings ablaze as to get the insurance money.
and thats basically what we have been accused here. evil zionist silverstein, buys property only to destroy it, because its not making any money, has to be cleaned of asbestos, and maybe he even wants to snuff out a few gentile lives in the process.
why the 9-11 denial movemant does not see the terribly inherent anti-semitism in this whole argument is striking, and very disapointing.
but the fact is, after the 1993 bombing, it would have been terribly foolish NOT to have a huge terrorism stipulation in any insurance of the wtc.
the fact is...the wtc was indeed making money and rebounded from a slump in the mid- 1990's
the fact is larry silverstein actually had to pay rent for the wtc, even after it was destroyed, if he wanted to rebuild.
the fact is, even with the insurance money, with the wtc rebuilt, silverstein will not have made a fortune from the insurance.
and the fact is..if larry made a decision with the FDNY to "pull it"...meaning to collapse the building...that would make the FDNY conspirators in the destruction of the wtc. maybe the 9-11 deniars should think about that before they go accusing people of mass murder.
