• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Larry King and the Top Evangelicals

SherryA

Unregistered
S
Larry King was in rare form on Tuesday, Feb 1 when he hosted a panel of top evangelicals including Tim LaHaye and his wife and Franklin Graham. He challenged them all but good. It was as if he has had complaints for being such a wimp and has become a born again contrarian.

I went to CNN.com/larrykinglive and emailed the show expressing appreciation for this. I also urged Larry to start doing the same when he has on the mediums and paranormalists whom he usually, shamefully, gives a free ride. If others who also saw the Feb 1 show sent an email, who knows, maybe he'll finally oblige us. Maybe many of you have already done so and maybe that's why we're seeing some improvement, well at least we did Feb 1.
 
Very interesting! I've got to say I'm (finally) impressed by what King had to say. He actually asked some hard questions. Of course, most of the responses were the usual badly reasoned, bigoted excuses for arguments these guys make. That Lahaye guy is a complete wanker. But good job, Larry!
 
After I posted my comment about the Feb 1 show to CNN, I received a reply from them saying: "Comments become part of the viewer response report that is prepared and made available each day to our producers and senior management."

Larry King is SO influential. It excites me to think of what might--might--happen if enough of us praised Larry's performance with the evangelicals and suggested he show his oats with the psychics, as well. Maybe it's a long shot, but maybe not. After all, SOMETHING made him suddenly ramp up his challenges the other night. It might have been his own frustrations coming out, but who knows, it might have been comments he's already received many times over from "viewers like you." !!!

The link to the comment section on cnn.com/larrykinglive is:
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?12

I also think it would be helpful to buy a copy or two of Randi's SECRETS OF THE PSYCHICS and donate them to libraries. I've also done this with books, Randi's as well as Sagan's DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD. If you put bookplates in front of the books saying "donated by...name of you, a local person" these books are much more likely to stay in the library even if they are under-read. ---Sherry Austin.
 
Ipecac said:
Very interesting! I've got to say I'm (finally) impressed by what King had to say. He actually asked some hard questions. Of course, most of the responses were the usual badly reasoned, bigoted excuses for arguments these guys make. That Lahaye guy is a complete wanker. But good job, Larry!
I agree. Larry King is known for tossing "softballs" to his guests. That's his style. He's not a Mike Wallace-style confrontational journalist, and his deferential style has irked some of us in the past.

But Larry King did ask these guys some surprisingly hard-edged questions.

And I think some of these questions, and the answers thereto, have given me a new insight into the "thinking" of some of these blowhards.

It was interesting that the LaHayes and Franklin Graham spoke of Bush as being a man of integrity. Considering some of the whopping lies that Bush has told to the American people and to the world, one has to wonder how they define "integrity." It appears that they define it according to profession of religious belief. Bush publicly mentions "God" and "Jesus" and "Christ," and he wants to implement evangelical principles into laws that everyone must follow; therefore, he is a man of integrity.

But why is it so important that evangelical principles be cast into laws that everyone must follow? Isn't it enough that evangelicals follow those principles in their own lives? Tim LaHaye said that it wasn't enough for Jimmy Carter to be a man of faith; LaHaye objected to Carter because he didn't let his faith "hang out," and his philosophy of government was--in LaHaye's opinion--at odds with Carter's faith. Beverly LaHaye:
I think it [faith] has a lot to do with governing, because your faith really helps you determine the direction you want to go. You have a higher being that you can call upon to give you clear thinking and direction. ... But the individuals going into government make decisions, and they make decisions for us. And we really want them to make decision that are going to be good for our children, our families.
Franklin Graham (on the subject of a constitutional amendment to prohibit gay marriage):
But he [the Almighty] gave sex to be used in a marriage relationship between a man and woman. And Larry, any time we get outside of the way God intended or what God's parameters are, we're at risk. And whether it's a man and a woman living together, outside of marriage, they're at risk because that's a sin. It's a sin against God. If it's two men living together or if it's two women living together having sex, it's a sin against God. And God's going to judge sin.
Tim LaHaye expressed the perverse view that those who disagreed with him were, by that fact, imposing their views upon him and others. An atheist who objected to the words "under God" in the Pledge was imposing his atheism on society. A gay person trying to raise a child was imposing his values on society. A teacher that teaches evolution is imposing his values on society, namely that man is independent of God.

And they see the Almighty as punishing sin. Asked why an omnipotent deity would permit tragedies such as 9/11 or the recent tsunami, Tim LaHaye said:
Well, Larry, I think you have to go back to the fall. We live in a fallen race. Adam and Eve made a terrible blunder when they sinned against God and then propagated that to the human race.
The tsunami, said the LaHayes, was a part of God's plan... but God didn't cause it, He simply didn't act to prevent it. The tsunami was a warning that the end is near and that you get your heart ready to meet the Lord.

The overall picture presented by the LaHayes and Graham is disturbing. There seems to be a feeling is that evangelical values have to be imposed on everyone by law, because if they aren't, then that is exactly the same as sinful values being imposed upon everyone. And, in their view, the Almighty will judge harshly those with sinful values. In addition, the Almighty does not always act surgically, as He has planned various catastrophic events that will cause suffering to both the guilty and the innocent, and He will withhold His protection to notify the world that harsh judgment is near.
 
Tim LaHaye expressed the perverse view that those who disagreed with him were, by that fact, imposing their views upon him and others. An atheist who objected to the words "under God" in the Pledge was imposing his atheism on society. A gay person trying to raise a child was imposing his values on society. A teacher that teaches evolution is imposing his values on society, namely that man is independent of God.

As interesting as this is exactly the kind of reasons and logic that Osama Bin Ladin uses when justifying his holy war...
 
Per Beverly LaHaye's quote on Larry King: "...your faith really helps you determine the direction you want to go. You have a higher being that you can call upon to give you clear thinking and direction." ---That's precisely what the 911 terrorists thought, and I believe it is entirely possible that that--not just hatred--is what motivated them. They really thought they were doing the will of Allah, just as Bush believes he is doing the will of the Judeo/Christian God.

I went to college with Franklin Graham. My roommate and best friend at the time was close friends with the Grahams and her husband is Franklin's best friend and now the vice president of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. Franklin does good work ---"I was hungry and you fed me, I was naked and you clothed me, I was thirsty and you gave me drink" but his thinking, and those of his genuinely kind father are incredibly simplistic, though sincere, and that, I believe, is the scary thing.---Sherry Austin.
 
FYI, I think that Larry's responding to the ratings changes due to the O'Reilly Factor format and success. If his ratings and responses peak, he'll probably continue the trend, so writing is a good idea. (I'm going to do it!)

Much as I despise Bill O'Reilly, I'd also enjoy seeing him interview Sylvia. :D
 
Brown's comments pretty much echoed my reactions to that article. (Good post, Brown).
Tim LaHaye is certainly one big ignorant hypocrite. I'd like to quote these rather telling little gems:

This one just about says it all:

"KING: Does the Christian church care about Social Security, tax, war in Iraq?
T. LAHAYE: No"

He's a godamm liar:

"T. LAHAYE: I think religious freedom has been under attack in our country well over 50 years.
KING: Explain.
T. LAHAYE: Well, the 1st Amendment is supposed to guarantee the government stays out of religion.
KING: And vice-versa.
T. LAHAYE: We don't want the government to tell us what church to belong to and what faith to have."

He contradicts himself in one breath (emphasis mine):

"KING: Why shouldn't they teach evolution?
T. LAHAYE: Because it's not proven, it's just a theory.
KING: Adam and Eve is proven?
T. LAHAYE: No. It's a theory.
KING: Their both theories.
T. LAHAYE: We who believe, we who have faith and believe the Bible is true, we believe it's a fact. However, we understand that in the public school, it is -- it should be presented as a theory, equal with the theory..
KING: What is the harm of teaching evolution? How does that harm the society?
T. LAHAYE: It shows man as independent of God. He can function..."

And he's an ignorant, homophobic bigot:

"KING: The question is can two men lead a good and wholesome life? They can't, in your opinion?
T. LAHAYE: I don't think they can."

:mad:

Edited to add: Good on Larry King for getting a little harder hitting with these fanatics. It did seem like toward the middle of the segment he was starting to get a little frustrated with the pigheaded ignorance on display. I'm glad he didn't just let them say all of these thing without being called on some of them.
 
Evolution Revolution

I think the worst statement on the Larry King episode featuring the top evangelicals was LaHaye's: "We weren't made for creation. Creation was made for us."

I'm sure most of you are up on this, but just in case:

"CSICOP Proudly launches a new website to track and monitor developments in the Creation vs. Evolution debate and the Intelligent Design movement. The site features links to news items from the popular press, as well as articles and commentaries from the Skeptical Inquirer magazine, information on courses in evolution, and links to websites defending evolution. We will also bring you a regular column by Eugenie Scott, head of the National Center for Science Education (www.ncseweb.org); and frequent commentary by web blogger Jason Rosenhouse from his site: http://evolutionblog.blogspot.com/ "


Thumbs up to all of you who have said you will email the Larry King show (http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?12)
and let them know you hope he'll challenge paranormalists in future shows just as he did the evangelicals on the Feb 1st show. ---Sherry Austin.
 
Re: Evolution Revolution

SherryA said:
I'm sure most of you are up on this, but just in case:

"CSICOP Proudly launches a new website to track and monitor developments in the Creation vs. Evolution debate and the Intelligent Design movement. The site features links to news items from the popular press, as well as articles and commentaries from the Skeptical Inquirer magazine, information on courses in evolution, and links to websites defending evolution. We will also bring you a regular column by Eugenie Scott, head of the National Center for Science Education (www.ncseweb.org); and frequent commentary by web blogger Jason Rosenhouse from his site: http://evolutionblog.blogspot.com/ "
This sounds like something I'd be interested in. Do you have a URL for the new site? I don't see any mention of it on the CSICOP site itself. Or is the evolutionblog the new site they're referring to? I'm confused.
 
Sorry, Baba. The info about tracking the Creation/Evolution debate came from the CSICOP newsletter I receive. See Creation Watch http://www.csicop.org/creationwatch/

That issue also has a Joe Nickell article: Claims of Invalid “Shroud” Radiocarbon Date Cut from Whole Cloth

If this doesn't help, let me know and I'll try harder. --- Sherry Austin.
 

Back
Top Bottom