• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: ...knee to the back of the neck while black: until dead. Part 2

Squeegee Beckenheim

Penultimate Amazing
Squeegee Beckenheim
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
32,124
Continuation thread, feel free to quote from and reference original thread. http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=13116928
Posted By: Darat




1yA6b33.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thermal said:
"As a citizen concerned with waterway pollution..."
Click to expand...

You'll be glad to know then that Trump has done away with those anti-business regulations, you are now clear to pollute the waterways as you wish!



;)


ETA: And yes I know Trump isn't president of the UK, not until Johnson signs the deal anyway...
 
Last edited:
Darat said:
Hard to claim he wasn’t. In fact pretty much impossible!

Reading the comments it is very apparent that the propaganda of the war years was more successful then its authors would ever have thought.
Click to expand...

Most of the population of the UK was rather explicitly racist back then. The same was true of the United States.
 
Darat said:
Hard to claim he wasn’t. In fact pretty much impossible!

Reading the comments it is very apparent that the propaganda of the war years was more successful then its authors would ever have thought.
Click to expand...

The entire British Empire was racist. The whole concept was racist. Churchill wanted to keep the empire. Of course he was racist. As was Rudyard Kiplling, and Her Majesty the Empress of India, and.....everyone. There may have been a very small handful of non-racists born in 19th century Britain, but it was a very small number indeed, and that goes for most people born in the first half of the 20th century as well.


Apparently, there was an explosion of virtue during the post war period, and the people born then were virtuous, good, and wholesome people, while all the people before them were rotten to the core. Maybe there was a fortuitous mutation that spread through the population increasing the virtuous behavior.

We should tear down all the statues of anyone born before 1950, prior to the onset of virtue in the population. That goes for America as well. That Lincoln fellow, on the pennies? That dude was one serious racist.
 
Meadmaker said:
The entire British Empire was racist. The whole concept was racist. Churchill wanted to keep the empire. Of course he was racist. As was Rudyard Kiplling, and Her Majesty the Empress of India, and.....everyone. There may have been a very small handful of non-racists born in 19th century Britain, but it was a very small number indeed, and that goes for most people born in the first half of the 20th century as well.


Apparently, there was an explosion of virtue during the post war period, and the people born then were virtuous, good, and wholesome people, while all the people before them were rotten to the core. Maybe there was a fortuitous mutation that spread through the population increasing the virtuous behavior.

We should tear down all the statues of anyone born before 1950, prior to the onset of virtue in the population. That goes for America as well. That Lincoln fellow, on the pennies? That dude was one serious racist.
Click to expand...

This.

Churchill also made quite a few anti-racist statements, something many of his contemporaries did not.
 
Last edited:
Captain_Swoop said:
Men without badges pulling people into their unmarked civilian cars, not reading Miranda rights, not telloing what they are being arrested for, and telling friends if they follow the car, they will be shot?
Complete lawlessness.

https://twitter.com/DeepNotion2/status/1269171217946247168
Click to expand...

Yes, it is really difficult to pretend that the BLM protesters don't have a point when police departments throughout the US seem so happy to tear up the First Amendment
 
jimbob said:
Yes, it is really difficult to pretend that the BLM protesters don't have a point when police departments throughout the US seem so happy to tear up the First Amendment
Click to expand...

I don't think any reasonable person has ever made the argument that BLM activists don't have a point. At least I hope not.
 
Backing up the claim tear gas wasn't used outside the WH, Barr says "Pepper spray is not a chemical irritant. It's not chemical"
 
And do we know yet how the cops knew what was in the boxes being shipped:

HuffPo: Law Enforcement Seized Masks Meant To Protect Anti-Racist Protesters From COVID-19
Now he’s wondering if the government is watching him or watching the Black Lives Matter movement. “I just don’t understand it. It’s just really blowing my mind,” he said.

It’s not entirely clear what law enforcement entity seized the masks or why. But the Justice Department, led by Attorney General William Barr, has taken an aggressive posture against demonstrations and on Thursday expressed concern about “extremist agitators” who are “hijacking the protests to pursue their own separate and violent agenda.”
Click to expand...
Spying on the recipients? Or the senders?
 
trustbutverify said:
Stop lying. He couldn't possibly have said that.
Click to expand...

evidence

Brennan again pressed the attorney general on whether he thought it was appropriate for police to use tear gas and other munitions to disperse the crowd, causing Barr to try to play a semantics game.

“No, there were not chemical irritants,” he falsely proclaimed. “Pepper spray is not a chemical irritant. It’s not chemical.”
Click to expand...

Said it on Face the Nation this morning. I was watching.

WaPo says so too (behind paywall) and numerous other sources.

You could have just googled it instead of calling Captain Swoop a liar. You can apologize now.

Edited to add: I should have known that TBF was being sarcastic. I offer a most sincere and humble apology.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom