Killtown releases a Shanksville video

ref

Master Poster
ref
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
2,685
I can't see the video at work, but I can read the transcript on that page. He is promoting the planted evidence no plane theory.

http://hoodwinkedatshanksville.blogspot.com/

He writes stuff like:

How do we know that a pair of black boxes weren’t taken from a previous plane crash and those were used to stage these photos?

And what's with this piece of wood in the crater???

Is that twisted piece of metal aluminum from a plane, or just a piece of tin?

Wow. Really convincing no plane theory, NOT.
 
Here he is releasing videos with no problems. What about that WTC 2 video he promised? Proves even more that he has none. Not that we would want to see one.
 
I don't understand this at all. Everything in that entire video could have been more concisely (and less ridiculously) presented on one short webpage. Why does it have to be a video at all? I almost feel embarrassed for the CTers who produce this rubbish. It's like when eager school teachers first discover PowerPoint, and suddenly every lesson becomes 50 awkward, animated slides.
 
Is this the same guy who sees faces in smoke?

I fast forwarded through parts of it and at 06:30 he proves that Bush nuked the WTC because the little box that houses all the processing hardware for the Flight Data Recorder didn't survive. Surely they don't expect us to believe that only the reinforced storage media would survive a crash?! Everyone knows the whole thing is made out of indestructium. :rolleyes:

The rest I couldn't be bothered to watch.

So.. did anyone count the number of copyright violations?
 
Pythra said:
I don't understand this at all. Everything in that entire video could have been more concisely (and less ridiculously) presented on one short webpage. Why does it have to be a video at all? I almost feel embarrassed for the CTers who produce this rubbish. It's like when eager school teachers first discover PowerPoint, and suddenly every lesson becomes 50 awkward, animated slides.
Click to expand...


Yeah, I've been saying that for a while now. Apparently troofers have a real problem with information presented in text format without mad beatz and illmatic picturez being added.

Actually, though I haven't watched the video yet, every time I think of Killtown I hear wacky clown music in my head rather than hip-hop rhythms.
 
jsiv said:
Is this the same guy who sees faces in smoke?

I fast forwarded through parts of it and at 06:30 he proves that Bush nuked the WTC because the little box that houses all the processing hardware for the Flight Data Recorder didn't survive. Surely they don't expect us to believe that only the reinforced storage media would survive a crash?! Everyone knows the whole thing is made out of indestructium. :rolleyes:

The rest I couldn't be bothered to watch.

So.. did anyone count the number of copyright violations?
Click to expand...

This is the same guy yeah. Wow, that was really hard to watch, it was so terrible. And why do they have to use AC/DC Music? Watching this is not recommended, unless you want to keep up with their awful mistheories.
 
I watched this earlier today. Pretty much everything brought up is just assumption. Looks like I need to research Flight 93's black boxes more, just in case this video is ever brought up in a debate.

I don't think it will be though, even a lot of Truthers don't agree with Killtown's theories.
 
Just the first minute has copyright violations by using AC/DC and Val's picture. The rest of the video is purely laughable. His first assumption is that there was no crash at Shanksville so the black boxes were planted. The moron makes a big deal that they were 10 feet apart (one was deeper) in the ground as if that really means anything. Then he makes himself look more stupid by claiming one recorder (black box) was from Allied Signal while the other was from Honeywell although they are the same company. He compares the lowercase a from signal to the capital H from honeywell or maybe it is the capital A from Allied. The creature called Killtown is a f[rule8]ing ignoranus and his video proves he is.
 
Yaknow, I don't watch movies when I know they're going to be crap. Further, I don't need to watch them to know their crap. When someone I trust tells me that Uwe Bol made a good movie I might watch it, until then I'll just assume they are all crap. When someone I trust tells me this video or any other Killtown projects are worth seeing I might watch it, until then I'l assume it's crap and not worth my time.
 
This new video of Killtown's is just another chitfest of speculation with no evidence.

He ask's the viewer 22 questions and doesn't answer any satisfactorily.

I see some people on the LCF are wondering whats up with all the questions and outright speculation? Did anyone really think that this 12:26 of bs was gona answer anything?

Killtown's movie could have been substantially condensed into around 1 min, as the big mystery is how the FDR had the label AlliedSignal and the CVR had Honeywell?!?

Heres Killtown speculating more for us all:

Back in black boxes said:
Notice how it was placed by some rocks along with a small peice of twisted metal, nicely tucked underneath...

Is that twisted piece of metal aluminum from a plane...

or just a piece of tin?

So, was it placed by some rocks with a piece of scap metal tucked underneath...

to again, make the photo look more convincing?
Click to expand...

So, the government wants to convince us so much that this is a genuine crash scene of flight 93, they place "tin" near the blackbox and wood in the crater?

Right, im with ya KT: the government is planting tin and scrap metal to make it look just right; even going to the lengths of idiocy in clearing off all the dirt for these photos so we can see the mistake in the label's even clearer?

Either their just woefully incompetent and leave the H in plain sight on the CVR along with wood in the crater for sharp folk like KT to sniff out, or it's a whistleblower trying to tell us it's all a fake.

Kinda like with moon landings and the "C" on the rock for "clever" etc.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I'm just stupid, but what difference does it make if the FDR and CVR were made by two different companies?

Are they not two entirely seperate devices?

??
???
????
?????
??????
 
Maybe I'm just stupid, but what difference does it make if the FDR and CVR were made by two different companies?

Are they not two entirely seperate devices?
Click to expand...

Well I wanna know why black boxes aren't black!!!!!!!! I mean seriously - Orange, black boxes??? So the gubmint has been lying to us. They never found black boxes, but orange ones...................And made by two different companies. Well thats it. Pearl harbor was obviously a black or should I say, orange flag operation
 
What a boring piece of crap!

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE


Is there anything that would be worth the effort to debunk it?

And who was the producer of this picture show? A pseudonym
called Killtown - or an anonymous, childish COWARD! using Shill-
Clowns name? :D
 
once again, troofers who claim to want to "take america back" are censoring the living bejesus out of those that don't agree. I commented that this video was the worst 12 minutes of my life...

BUH-LEETED

I said I saw the virgin mary in my toast.

BUH-LEETED

What is the truth coming to if all you want is to be surrounded by people that agree with everything you say?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom