• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Kavanaugh's follies

hank hill

Thinker
H
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
202
Location
Chicago, Illinois
This is the official thread for every bad choice Kavanaugh makes during his career as a Supreme Court justice. We may not be able to remove him, but at least his bad choices will give him notoriety.
 
Let us pray:

Let us pray that Kavanaugh is an order of magnitude less dishonest than New Zealand's new chief justice, Helen Winkelmann.

Oh, and less dishonest than Antonin Scalia as well. Rest in endless misery you hunter and killer.
 
hank hill said:
This is the official thread for every bad choice Kavanaugh makes during his career as a Supreme Court justice. We may not be able to remove him, but at least his bad choices will give him notoriety.
Click to expand...


True, you can't remove him.

His notoriety is inconsequential
 
applecorped said:
True, you can't remove him.
His notoriety is inconsequential
Click to expand...
Not necessarily.

There were opinion polls shortly after his confirmation that suggested that his nomination may have harmed the republicans (by turning some independents against the GOP, and/or making Democrats more likely to vote than their Republican counterparts.)

If people are reminded "this is what happens when you let a con artist become president... he picks potential rapists for the supreme court who are going to make bad decisions", then Democrats are more likely going to go vote, lest Trump get a second term and gets the ability to nominate more unqualified people.

Now, granted, the number of voters who actually read this forum will probably be too small to actually sway the election, but the concept of "look at the incompetent people Trump picked" actually does have value.
 
Kavanaugh's opinion on the census question about citizenship included bringing up the UN does it. More GOP hypocrisy. The GOP would have had a fit if a librul brought up the UN to support going against current US law.

SCOTUS hearing on Census citizenship question.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh pointed out that several major countries ask a citizenship question on their census, which is a recommendation by the United Nations. He also pointed out that until 1950, a citizenship question was a regular feature of the census in the U.S.
Click to expand...


Snope's history of the question on the Census is worth a short review.
 
Last edited:
smartcooky said:
Looks like ol' Drunky McRapeface did something decent for once... and Faux News fans (i.e. Trump's base) are not happy about it

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/fo...utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=377
Click to expand...
Interesting case.
He may well be innocent, a quick read of the evidence claims gun powder residue on his thumb he says was handling fireworks.
Does Kavanaugh believe he is innocent and ruled accordingly?
Are supreme court judges in America allowed to consider evidence?
They denied Brendan Dassey justice without comment recently.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom