Justices Debate Whether Death Penalty Ruling Can Be Retroactive

Solitaire

Neoclinus blanchardi
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
3,102
Location
Tennessee
Justices Debate Whether Death Penalty Ruling Can Be Retroactive
Summerlin was convicted of the 1981 murder of Brenna Bailey, 36.
Bailey's body was found in the trunk of her car a day after she went
to Summerlin's Arizona home to collect money on a loan.

During its ruling last year, the federal appeals court called it
"the raw material from which legal fiction is forged." Officials
learned that an anonymous tip pointing police to Summerlin
came from his wife, who said she had a psychic premonition.
One of Summerlin's own lawyers admitted to an illicit "romantic
encounter" with the prosecutor in the case that may have scuttled
an ongoing plea agreement that was eventually dropped.

Additionally, the judge in the case lost his job after admitting
to marijuana addiction and conviction. The judge has maintained
that he did not use drugs before the sentencing, The Associated
Press reported.
Which begs the question - is real life like a soap opera?
 
Synchronicity said:
Justices Debate Whether Death Penalty Ruling Can Be Retroactive

Which begs the question - is real life like a soap opera?

This sort of thing happens more than you think. It's amazing how much crap you can dig up if you really want to challenge a conviction. It is also amazing how much weird stuff the courts will ignore to keep people in jail, even when it turns out to be relevant.

This would get a 7 out of 10 on the weirdOmeter. Maybe bumped to an 8 as they are going to kill the guy.
 

Back
Top Bottom