In Houston, a judge has sentenced a man to one year of weekly yoga classes (among other things) for slapping his wife. Here, the judge explains his reasoning:
STANDLEY: I'll tell you what compelled me to do it, simply put, anger is a result of a feeling of a loss of control. And more and more I start seeing people that feel like they can control others around them. And the people that are really into yoga, just being in their presence, it is calming. And if it takes effect, I think it will help this individual. If not, then he will get revoked and do a year.
The rest of the story is here:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/24/cnna.standley/index.html
And here is my opinion: The judge is an idiot.
First, he seems to have trouble forming sentences.
Second, he admits he doesn't do yoga himself because he has a bad back. His explanation about why he imposed the sentence also included that he, the judge, felt calmer around people who do yoga. He seems to be imposing the yoga sentence based on his vague experiences with it and likely has no idea of what yoga encompasses. He has some idea that yoga will help with anger and loss of control issues. His personal experience with yoga is no more valid than mine.
Third, he already ordered the man to take anger management classes. The judge says he just basically added the yoga part on after everyone agreed to the sentence already.
Next, the judge reports the complainant has a documented substance abuse problem, so the judge orders the defendant to random drug testing? It is entirely possible that both parties have substance abuse problems. Or not. I hope the judge has some kind of evidence to sentence the man to drug testing, but given his reasoning in other areas, I'm not so sure...
Oh, I guess I could go on.
STANDLEY: I'll tell you what compelled me to do it, simply put, anger is a result of a feeling of a loss of control. And more and more I start seeing people that feel like they can control others around them. And the people that are really into yoga, just being in their presence, it is calming. And if it takes effect, I think it will help this individual. If not, then he will get revoked and do a year.
The rest of the story is here:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/24/cnna.standley/index.html
And here is my opinion: The judge is an idiot.
First, he seems to have trouble forming sentences.
Second, he admits he doesn't do yoga himself because he has a bad back. His explanation about why he imposed the sentence also included that he, the judge, felt calmer around people who do yoga. He seems to be imposing the yoga sentence based on his vague experiences with it and likely has no idea of what yoga encompasses. He has some idea that yoga will help with anger and loss of control issues. His personal experience with yoga is no more valid than mine.
Third, he already ordered the man to take anger management classes. The judge says he just basically added the yoga part on after everyone agreed to the sentence already.
Next, the judge reports the complainant has a documented substance abuse problem, so the judge orders the defendant to random drug testing? It is entirely possible that both parties have substance abuse problems. Or not. I hope the judge has some kind of evidence to sentence the man to drug testing, but given his reasoning in other areas, I'm not so sure...
Oh, I guess I could go on.