JFK's assassination: your thoughts

[bigred]

Well? Amazingly I didn't see a thread on this so what the heck

I think most "CTs" are people's over-active imaginations, but I don't think so in this case. I won't go on and on about the why's which have been beaten to death but feel free, maybe I'll chime in later Basically there are just way too many suspicious things/loose ends/etc.

 

[angrysoba]

Well? Amazingly I didn't see a thread on this so what the heck

You need to look in the conspiracy theory subforum for threads like these because that is where they belong, after all.

 

[bigred]

ah sorry, didn't realize there was, my bad

 

[Robrob]

ah sorry, didn't realize there was, my bad

12,732 posts in seven years and you didn't know there was a Conspiracy sub-forum?!

 

[bigred]

No, I just typically go to my usual ones

Good gravy. So much for bothering with that though - 12K+ posts? I suspect it's so deep in detail and cat fights there might even be a conspiracy theory about that thread

 

[kajata]

12,732 posts in seven years and you didn't know there was a Conspiracy sub-forum?!

I know. Something just doesn't add up about this. What do we really know about this "bigred"? It's probably not even his real name.

 

[HighRiser]

Also, 12k posts and doesn't realize polls are invalid without a Planet X option.

If your poll had "Oswald alone" without the "probably" modifier, I might have voted. Since there's no Planet X option, I can't vote.

 

[paiute]

Basically there are just way too many suspicious things/loose ends/etc.

Name one historical event that did not.

 

[Locknar]

Thread moved from History, Literature, and the Arts

Posted By: Locknar

 

[Bell]

I voted "other" because it wasn't probably Oswald, it was Oswald

 

[jaydeehess]

I voted "other" because it wasn't probably Oswald, it was Oswald

Closed minded, Bell? Or perhaps case closed?

 

[Bell]

Closed minded, Bell? Or perhaps case closed?

Oswald didn't kill Kennedy

 

[jaydeehess]

Oswald didn't kill Kennedy

sarcasm. I should have included [CT] [/CT] parentheses.

 

[Bell]

sarcasm. I should have included [CT] [/CT] parentheses.

 

[beachnut]

I voted "other" because it wasn't probably Oswald, it was Oswald

When I saw probably... that could lead to other. Other like, Based on evidence who killed JFK... pick one or more...


When I saw first hand where Oswald was for the shooting, I discovered CTers were full of lies about how hard it would be. I could have hit JFK with a rock, or a tomato. Easy shot.

Probably leads to acquittal, probably ...

 

[Mudcat]

Other: On Planet X, JFK murdered Oswald.

 

[LSSBB]

Well? Amazingly I didn't see a thread on this so what the heck

I think most "CTs" are people's over-active imaginations, but I don't think so in this case. I won't go on and on about the why's which have been beaten to death but feel free, maybe I'll chime in later Basically there are just way too many suspicious things/loose ends/etc.

Linkies:

JFK Thread Phase I

JFK Thread Phase II

 

[Mudcat]

Linkies:

JFK Thread Phase I

JFK Thread Phase II

To summarize, a certain banned individual keeps on making the same claims and fringe resets whilst plagiarizing obscure conspiracy theory oriented websites. All this while pretty much everyone else points out why he is wrong.

 

[LSSBB]

To summarize, a certain banned individual keeps on making the same claims and fringe resets whilst plagiarizing obscure conspiracy theory oriented websites. All this while pretty much everyone else points out why he is wrong.

Not only that, he did a thoroughly effective job of convincing me that Oswald could have been the only shooter! Although that was not quite his intent...

 

[Mudcat]

Not only that, he did a thoroughly effective job of convincing me that Oswald could have been the only shooter! Although that was not quite his intent...

He was a lot like DOC in that aspect, always convincing people that the opposite of their (constantly recycled) claims are true.