28th Kingdom has again posted his ultimate smoking gun on LCF.
His previous attempt was for some reason promptly deleted, so, because I really luve him and don't want his efforts to be waisted again, I will post his ultimate smoking gun here.
Maybe, just maybe, one of the smart guys here can debunk it.
But I doubt it, the game seems to be up.
Who dares take him on?
His previous attempt was for some reason promptly deleted, so, because I really luve him and don't want his efforts to be waisted again, I will post his ultimate smoking gun here.
Maybe, just maybe, one of the smart guys here can debunk it.
But I doubt it, the game seems to be up.
28th Kingdom@LCF said:Hey,
Here is a piece of undeniable visual evidence, that explosives were used on the Twin Towers...
In this video, you can clearly see that debris started shooting out of the sides of the towers before the upper mass even began to fall...
Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. I AGREE
When watching this at normal speeds... I think what misleads our eyes... is the fact that the first ring of "material," appears to be smoke gushing out of the impact floors after the upper mass begins to fall. But, when slowed down... what we find out is that this isn't smoke at all... but rather crushed concrete that is being ejected out the sides, before the upper mass even begins to move.
NIST says that the kinetic energy released from the falling upper mass, is what contributed to the failure of the lower floors.... but, of course... we all know that kinetic energy is only present in a moving object, and thus... if the upper mass has yet to move... there is no kinetic energy... so what energy or force is crushing the concrete inside the tower, and then ejecting it out the sides?
And, please don't say the upper mass shot a laser out of its a$$, because we've all heard that one before.![]()
Who dares take him on?
Last edited: