• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Is this Andrew Breitbart guy literally insane?

Peephole

Master Poster
Peephole
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
2,584
He behaves so unhinged he seems to either either have mental problems or serious substance abuse issues:

 
Okay, so he's acting like a jerk in the video; he's a Tea Party activist; he has quoted NAACP speakers out of context; etc. No, he's not insane; nor is he on drugs. He's just a dick.
 
Oh, look at that. A leftist protest with rhyming chants. That's a first.

And I think enough evidence exists that OWS is full of at least filthy people, if not filthy freaks, that he's not off-base there. And need you be reminded of the sexual assaults that have happened at Occupy protests?

And since when is being an "activist" with the "Tea Party" countable in a list of supporting evidence of dickishness?
 
BenBurch said:
Protestants get in on the act too;
Click to expand...

So did public schools.

And any of this has what, exactly, to do with Breitbart?

The guy is abrasive and confrontational. He intends to be. That doesn't make him insane. He knows exactly what he's doing. He's performing street theater, just like the protesters are.
 
Because it's a deranged right-winger (yeah I know, aren't they all?) going absolutely bonkers.

It tickles my funny bone.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
So the other 29 are also bonkers. But they share your biases so that makes it ok?
Click to expand...

They're not bonkers, they're left-wingers. Remember, Peephole just said that being right-wing is synonymous with insanity, so obviously being left-wing must be synonymous with being sane.

That Peephole, he's so smart!
 
Grizzly Adams said:
Why would I need to be reminded of it? Did Breitbart do any of it? What bearing does it have on this thread?
Click to expand...

That's the point; it doesn't. This was to show how your post similarly had nothing to do with the subject.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
So the other 29 are also bonkers. But they share your biases so that makes it ok?
Click to expand...

While the other 29 may be odd, are they accusing strangers of actively raping people?? I only see one obviously unhinged individual behaving that way in the video.

While it may be a bit of a no true occupier fallacy, I am not aware of the occupiers featuring any white nationalists as speakers. That gives them the moral high ground over CPAC organizers and attendees. I readily await the "no true white nationalist" rebuttal.

As for the "d@#$ishness" argument, it goes like this. Breitbart is a darling of the Tea Party, Breitbart is a reprehensible individual, one would have to be a total d@#$ to admire Breitbart, therefor Tea Party membership is evidence of d@#$ishness. QED

Daredelvis
 
Yes, he must be thoroughly insane. How else could he think that a bunch of leftie loonies would behave themselves?
 
Grizzly Adams said:
And since when is being an "activist" with the "Tea Party" countable in a list of supporting evidence of dickishness?
Click to expand...

Probably around the same time the Tea Party became a bunch of anti-human sociopaths bent on turning America into some sort of Christian Taliban dystopia.
 
daredelvis said:
While it may be a bit of a no true occupier fallacy, I am not aware of the occupiers featuring any white nationalists as speakers. That gives them the moral high ground over CPAC organizers and attendees.
Click to expand...

They've featured Communists. Communists are no better than Nazis.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom