I’ve found this example of a psychic prediction, with a dated document that seems valid and I'd like to ask for a little help. It concerns a prediction of the whereabouts of a man named Charlie Jordan, who was a drug smuggler on the run in the mid/late 1980s.
The story is that, in 1989, a remote viewer on the US government program named the location where the fugitive eventually turned up. The original session notes seem to be missing from the declassified documents, but a dated document containing a summary of the session is available. I've put a mediafire link to it, if anyone wants to see it. The section in question is on page three, attributed to viewer 079.
http://www.mediafire.com/?9zj1p391pqhh4zy
There's an article on the Csicop site which raises some valid points: there's a good reason to believe the remote viewer wasn't blind to the target (because other viewers had already done sessions on Charlie Jordan before she did) plus, of course, her session was one of many and all of the others were wrong.
http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/remotely_viewed_the_charlie_jordan_case/
But the fact remains that, while her colleagues were saying Charlie was in California/Mexico/Florida, she did say Lovell (or Lowell) and that's where he was found. I find this interesting but I'm unable to properly examine what was known or said about the case in the media at the time.
Does anyone have access to US newspaper archives for that time (March/April 1989)? How wild and unlikely is that guess? If anyone can look up the story in contemporary newspapers, and see what the prevailing theory regarding Charlie Jordan was, I'd be grateful.
The story is that, in 1989, a remote viewer on the US government program named the location where the fugitive eventually turned up. The original session notes seem to be missing from the declassified documents, but a dated document containing a summary of the session is available. I've put a mediafire link to it, if anyone wants to see it. The section in question is on page three, attributed to viewer 079.
http://www.mediafire.com/?9zj1p391pqhh4zy
There's an article on the Csicop site which raises some valid points: there's a good reason to believe the remote viewer wasn't blind to the target (because other viewers had already done sessions on Charlie Jordan before she did) plus, of course, her session was one of many and all of the others were wrong.
http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/remotely_viewed_the_charlie_jordan_case/
But the fact remains that, while her colleagues were saying Charlie was in California/Mexico/Florida, she did say Lovell (or Lowell) and that's where he was found. I find this interesting but I'm unable to properly examine what was known or said about the case in the media at the time.
Does anyone have access to US newspaper archives for that time (March/April 1989)? How wild and unlikely is that guess? If anyone can look up the story in contemporary newspapers, and see what the prevailing theory regarding Charlie Jordan was, I'd be grateful.