Let's talk biology and evolution, for a change.
... http://hauns.com/~DCQu4E5g/Complexity.htm
Extracts:-
"The term simple cell is an oxymoron. There is no such thing.
... The truth is that the simplest living cell has over one trillion molecules in it... All of the molecules in that cell have to be in just the right place at the right time or the cell will either malfunction or not function and die. Think of it this way, there are from 500 to over 1,000 times more molecules in the simplest cell than there are people on Earth and, unlike the people on Earth, all of the molecules must be in exactly the right place at the right time or it wont work.
... If an evolutionist uses the phrase,"simple cell", he has already started lying to you. There is no such thing."
... http://www.foolishfaith.com/book_chap3_odds.asp
Extract:-
“To grasp the reality of life as it has been revealed by molecular biology, we must magnify a cell a thousand million times until it is twenty kilometers in diameter and resembles a giant airship large enough to cover a great city like London or New York. What we would then see would be an object of unparalleled complexity and adaptive design. On the surface of the cell we would see millions of openings, like the portholes of a vast spaceship, opening and closing to allow a continual stream of materials to flow in and out. If we were to enter one of these openings we would find ourselves in a world of supreme technology and bewildering complexity.â€
... http://acs.ucsd.edu/~idea/irredcomplex.htm
Extracts:-
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
--Charles Darwin, Origin of Species
"With this statement, Charles Darwin provided a criterion by which his theory of evolution could be falsified. The logic was simple: since evolution is a gradual process in which slight modifications produce advantages for survival, it cannot produce complex structures in a short amount of time. It's a step-by-step process which may gradually build up and modify complex structures, but it cannot produce them suddenly."
Enough ammo there to start a discussion. I'm especially interested in that last paragraph. How do 'Darwinians' explain the origin of the so-called "simple cell"?
... http://hauns.com/~DCQu4E5g/Complexity.htm
Extracts:-
"The term simple cell is an oxymoron. There is no such thing.
... The truth is that the simplest living cell has over one trillion molecules in it... All of the molecules in that cell have to be in just the right place at the right time or the cell will either malfunction or not function and die. Think of it this way, there are from 500 to over 1,000 times more molecules in the simplest cell than there are people on Earth and, unlike the people on Earth, all of the molecules must be in exactly the right place at the right time or it wont work.
... If an evolutionist uses the phrase,"simple cell", he has already started lying to you. There is no such thing."
... http://www.foolishfaith.com/book_chap3_odds.asp
Extract:-
“To grasp the reality of life as it has been revealed by molecular biology, we must magnify a cell a thousand million times until it is twenty kilometers in diameter and resembles a giant airship large enough to cover a great city like London or New York. What we would then see would be an object of unparalleled complexity and adaptive design. On the surface of the cell we would see millions of openings, like the portholes of a vast spaceship, opening and closing to allow a continual stream of materials to flow in and out. If we were to enter one of these openings we would find ourselves in a world of supreme technology and bewildering complexity.â€
... http://acs.ucsd.edu/~idea/irredcomplex.htm
Extracts:-
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
--Charles Darwin, Origin of Species
"With this statement, Charles Darwin provided a criterion by which his theory of evolution could be falsified. The logic was simple: since evolution is a gradual process in which slight modifications produce advantages for survival, it cannot produce complex structures in a short amount of time. It's a step-by-step process which may gradually build up and modify complex structures, but it cannot produce them suddenly."
Enough ammo there to start a discussion. I'm especially interested in that last paragraph. How do 'Darwinians' explain the origin of the so-called "simple cell"?
