• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Iran Ready to Provide Nuke 'Guarantees'

Mycroft

High Priest of Ed
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Messages
20,501
Mycroft said:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040829/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear&e=1&ncid=



Whew! I was worried there for a while.

I didn't realize that Muslims couldn't use nukes. Now that I know, I feel a lot better.

I think it is a good sign. We've not as far as I know, heard language like this from the Iranians before. That they are now talking about it has to be a good thing - doesn’t it?

The "a Muslim wouldn't build nuclear weapons" (to paraphrase) does bemuse me; unless I am mistaken Pakistan has built and tested nuclear weapons...?
 
"We are ready to do everything necessary to give guarantees that we won't seek nuclear weapons," Khatami said.

"As Muslims, we can't use nuclear weapons," he told reporters in Tehran. "One who can't use nuclear weapons won't produce them."
They CAN'T use nuclear weapons. What a relief.

They CAN'T (are unable to) use them. Not they MAY NOT (are prohibited) use them.

I can't use them either. Might be different if someone gave me one and showed me how to use it.

I believe them when they tell me they don't know how to produce nuclear weapons. Nobody in those Muslim middle east countries knows how to build a plane either. But they learned how to use them well enough for their purposes.

Would someone please explain to me why a country that's almost floating on oil needs nuclear plants...?
 
Mycroft said:
I didn't realize that Muslims couldn't use nukes. Now that I know, I feel a lot better.

It's all that refined Pork-235. Of course, they could build a renderer and have a Lard-based bomb, but that requires more electronics.
 
They've got Kerry/Edwards convinced, though.
"A John F. Kerry administration would propose to Iran that the Islamic state be allowed to keep its nuclear power plants in exchange for giving up the right to retain the nuclear fuel that could be used for bomb-making, Democratic vice presidential nominee John Edwards said in an interview yesterday.

"Edwards said that if Iran failed to take what he called a "great bargain," it would essentially confirm that it is building nuclear weapons under the cover of a supposedly peaceful nuclear power initiative. He said that, if elected, Kerry would ensure that European allies were prepared to join the United States in levying heavy sanctions if Iran rejected the proposal. "If we are engaging with Iranians in an effort to reach this great bargain and if in fact this is a bluff that they are trying to develop nuclear weapons capability, then we know that our European friends will stand with us," Edwards said.
Where to start...?
Kerry would ensure that European allies were prepared to join the United States
Like they've always cooperated with us before.
in levying heavy sanctions if Iran rejected the proposal.
Yup - those sanctions worked so well against Saddam. Or was it the threat that the Europeans would join us in the sanctions that led to Saddam's downfall? I forget...
we know that our European friends will stand with us," Edwards said.
Well, there's a first time for everything, I suppose. Why do I find it more likely to believe that the Europeans will do anything rather than confront Iranian malfeasance?
 
BPSCG said:

Well, there's a first time for everything, I suppose. Why do I find it more likely to believe that the Europeans will do anything rather than confront Iranian malfeasance?

Because they're probably making a ton of money off it. That's how they're able to finance their "principled" stands against US imperialism.
 
Re: Re: Iran Ready to Provide Nuke 'Guarantees'

Darat said:
The "a Muslim wouldn't build nuclear weapons" (to paraphrase) does bemuse me; unless I am mistaken Pakistan has built and tested nuclear weapons...?

Oh wait, I forgot about that.

Oh well. At least I got one good nights sleep before reality descended.
 
U.N. Delivers Mixed Report on Iran Nuclear Program

VIENNA (Reuters) - U.N. inspectors delivered a mixed report on Iran's nuclear activities Wednesday that failed to either confirm or disprove U.S. allegations the country is secretly trying to build nuclear weapons.

The U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in a confidential report circulated to diplomats and obtained by Reuters that Iran planned a test of a uranium conversion facility soon.

It said Iranian technicians had told IAEA inspectors they planned to convert 37 tons of "yellowcake" uranium into uranium hexafluoride -- which one Western nuclear expert said could in theory be enough to build five atomic bombs.

:eek:

Iran insists the only purpose of its nuclear program is electricity generation. It denies having done any uranium enrichment close to the level needed to fuel a power plant, let alone weapons.

Oh, no worries then. Iran has that energy crisis they need to deal with.


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/nm/20040901/wl_nm/nuclear_iran_dc
 

Back
Top Bottom