When asked to name names of people the truth movement thinks were involved in 9/11, a frequent response is, "We can't tell you, that's why we need an investigation!"
A question - what the hell would this new investigation be doing? Going over the old evidence and coming to the same conclusion again? Or if there is evidence the truth movement has that suggests another party was involved, what is the evidence, and who does it implicate?
Or would the investigators just sit around and contemplate their navels?
A question - what the hell would this new investigation be doing? Going over the old evidence and coming to the same conclusion again? Or if there is evidence the truth movement has that suggests another party was involved, what is the evidence, and who does it implicate?
Or would the investigators just sit around and contemplate their navels?