Images from the Spitzer infrared telescope released

roger

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
May 22, 2002
Messages
11,466
http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/mediaimages/data.shtml

Some sweet images from a new NASA space telescope.

ssc2003-06b_small.jpg
 
now THAT is beautiful and awe inspiring and makes me thankful for technology
 
All I want for xmas is a spaceship and infinite life, so I can explore the whole universe.

ah well....
 
Those fools!

They've revealed the Great Running Sort of Like a Monkey With Its Head Turned Funny in the Sky!
 
roger said:
All I want for xmas is a spaceship and infinite life, so I can explore the whole universe.

ah well....

I just read Tomorrow and tomorrow, by Charles Sheffield. His protagonist has a spaceship and infinite life, but he's only focused on resurrecting his dead wife. Don't read it, it's the worst Sheffield I've been exposed to.

The spitzer pics are cool though. Sign me up for a spaceship, infinite life, and adjustable spectrum vision.
 
The images look real nice, maybe in the coming months we'll see Veteran Hubble vs. Newbie Spitzer... in classic Starwars-themed combat, of course...
 
Awesome pics. And more fuel to the fire to upgrade my telescope.
 
While I agree that the photos are beautiful, I can't help but feel less in awe of them now than I would have a year or two ago, when I first read about how most of these pictures are colorized. The fact is that if you were flying by most of these amazing sights in space or looking at them throught your own powerful telescope, you would not see the same colors as are seen on most space pictures.

Some photos have accompanying text that does mention the fake colors, most that I have seen do not, and I doubt that most of the general population know that the colors are not real.

Why do they use make-believe color? My guess is that they think the real color is too mundane, and that people would be less interested in space if was seen as mostly black and white. To me it's like someone going to Africa, taking pictures of the animals, and then coloring the photos so that the zebras are every color of the rainbow. Hey, anything to keep the funding coming in.

I'm all in favor of space exploration, but I think every relevant photo should be marked "color enhanced" when they are more of a digital painting than an accurate representation of what is really there.

There's an article on the colorizing of Hubble photos here:

http://www.hubblesite.org/sci.d.tech/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of_color/index.shtml
 
William H. said:
While I agree that the photos are beautiful, I can't help but feel less in awe of them now than I would have a year or two ago, when I first read about how most of these pictures are colorized. The fact is that if you were flying by most of these amazing sights in space or looking at them throught your own powerful telescope, you would not see the same colors as are seen on most space pictures.

Some photos have accompanying text that does mention the fake colors, most that I have seen do not, and I doubt that most of the general population know that the colors are not real.

Why do they use make-believe color? My guess is that they think the real color is too mundane, and that people would be less interested in space if was seen as mostly black and white. To me it's like someone going to Africa, taking pictures of the animals, and then coloring the photos so that the zebras are every color of the rainbow. Hey, anything to keep the funding coming in.

I'm all in favor of space exploration, but I think every relevant photo should be marked "color enhanced" when they are more of a digital painting than an accurate representation of what is really there.

There's an article on the colorizing of Hubble photos here:

http://www.hubblesite.org/sci.d.tech/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of_color/index.shtml

Well, for these it's the fact that it measures in the infrared, which we don't see at all.

But even when the colours are changed they represent reality. Accurately. They don't just repaint things in random colours, they replace certain wavelengths with others, to enhance features that can't be necessarily be seen with the naked eye.
When pictures of flowers are changed to show the features revealed in the ultraviolet it's the same thing.

But it would be good if they were always labled as enhancements.
 
William H. said:
While I agree that the photos are beautiful, I can't help but feel less in awe of them now than I would have a year or two ago, when I first read about how most of these pictures are colorized. The fact is that if you were flying by most of these amazing sights in space or looking at them throught your own powerful telescope, you would not see the same colors as are seen on most space pictures.

Some photos have accompanying text that does mention the fake colors, most that I have seen do not, and I doubt that most of the general population know that the colors are not real.

Why do they use make-believe color? My guess is that they think the real color is too mundane, and that people would be less interested in space if was seen as mostly black and white. To me it's like someone going to Africa, taking pictures of the animals, and then coloring the photos so that the zebras are every color of the rainbow. Hey, anything to keep the funding coming in.

I'm all in favor of space exploration, but I think every relevant photo should be marked "color enhanced" when they are more of a digital painting than an accurate representation of what is really there.

There's an article on the colorizing of Hubble photos here:

http://www.hubblesite.org/sci.d.tech/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of_color/index.shtml
As mentioned above, the photos are taken in infrared.

When it comes to the processing, some of the colors in the photo are shifted back a ways from infrared to the visible light spectrum.

The colors arent added at random, they arent painted on to make the prettiest effect. As bjornart said, the colors are meant to represent reality.
 

Back
Top Bottom