I wanted to ignore this but....

“Gender, race and impairment all relate to what a person is, whereas homosexuality relates to what a person does.”
Aha, so women choose to be the sex to give birth, and wheelchair-bound people choose to use a ramp to enter a building. I get it.

~~ Paul
 
Extreme stuff like this always makes me curious;

http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c040.html

Is this as ********ty as I think?


How is it that a certain proportion of the population is so logic-challenged?


Examples I've come across in recent years:

* If $cientology doesn't work for you, it's your fault.

* If Primal Therapy doesn't work for you, it's your fault.

* If Republican politics don't work for you, it's your fault.


I'm sure everyone has copious examples to add.

Just more compelling evidence that most over the age of 21 are in need of an education.

M.
 
How is it that a certain proportion of the population is so logic-challenged?


Examples I've come across in recent years:

* If $cientology doesn't work for you, it's your fault.

* If Primal Therapy doesn't work for you, it's your fault.

* If Republican politics don't work for you, it's your fault.


I'm sure everyone has copious examples to add.

Just more compelling evidence that most over the age of 21 are in need of an education.

M.

I'm drinking right now so, please, who are you replying to?

Me or the site?
 
Wow, that's some seriously strong stupidity... do you expect anything less from Christianity?
 
Jeebustarian morons said:
Since other groups who have been discriminated against (such as women, blacks and the disabled) have been given equal opportunity, homosexuals claim that they, too, should be liberated.

At least they admit that they do discriminate against us. And if their Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddy actually existed, it might be possible for their moronic drivel to represent His will.

Later these idiots claim that when Jeebus spoke about marriage he referred to chapters of the Bible that did not exist until hundreds of years later. Neat trick!

Extremely Stupid Homophobes said:
When Jesus was questioned about marriage, He referred to these 2 chapters (Matthew 19:1-12; Mark 10:1-12).


Of course once you invent a fictional deity it is hardly a challenge to make up a list of its sooper powers, including the ability to read non-existent documents. Why shouldn't an imaginary deity quote from a non-existent text?

In the case of people like these, I think the irrational fear and loathing of gay people comes first, and then the Fundamentalist drivel is used to put some nice pretty lipstick and a dress on their bigotry.

Don't let these chumps bother you, Pauliesonne. There will always be something stupid for the stupid people to feel self-righteous about.
 
The final report of the Baptist Union of Western Australia (BUWA) Task Force on Human Sexuality states “that a person becomes a homosexual ultimately by choosing to be involved in same-sex activity… This is in contrast to innate characteristics such as gender and ethnicity.”7 The report affirms that “the Bible is clear that sin involves choice, and it unequivocally condemns homosexual behavior as sin.”7
I love not only that they had to form a "Task Force" to spew idiocy people have been vomiting out of their butts for years, but also the "logic" itself: they redefine "homosexuality" to mean "sex with another guy", the same way I could redefine "Afro-American" as "a poverty-stricken single parent whose children will grow up to become thugs", and on this basis say Afro-Americans shouldn't be allowed to have sex or marry.

And not only is is an illogical statement, but it also conflicts with their stance that words shouldn't be redefined ("oh my god, marriage is by definition between a man and a woman!").

If you can't redefine words, then stop saying that homosexuality means something else than the sexual attraction to your own gender.

The best part, of course, is that they redefine homosexuality to mean something else than homosexuality, for then to subtly use the attributes of the new definition to attack homosexuality. It's like me saying:

1. Israelis = People ruling the People's Republic of China.
2. People ruling the PRC are bad.
3. Therefore, Israelis, that is, people residing in Israel, are bad.

Effect on others

Secular psychologists assure us that 'children raised in lesbian and gay households are similar to children raised in heterosexual households on characteristics such as intelligence, development, moral judgments, self-concepts, social competence and gender identity'.6 The humanists have, however, forgotten one important ingredient.
“Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it” (Proverbs 22:6).
Oh. My. God.

They admit that children in homosexual households far just as well or better than those in heterosexual households, but they're still opposed to gay adoption and use as their reasoning a Bible verse taken out of context?!


You cannot faithfully teach God's Word to your children while living a lifestyle specifically condemned by God's Word. All Christians are sinners forgiven by God's grace, but living in a homosexual relationship constitutes habitual, unrepented sin.
First of all, all of today's Christians "live a lifestyle specifically condemned by God's Word", because there's so much **** in the Old Testament that you can't follow more than a tiny fraction of it without being sent to Guantanamo Bay.


Then they go on to stating that gays are "habitual, unrepented sinners" in the same sentence they state that all sinners are forgiven.


After reading a fraction of that, I'm starting to seriously wonder if it's a sarcastic parody.
 
Last edited:
I love not only that they had to form a "Task Force" to spew idiocy people have been vomiting out of their butts for years, but also the "logic" itself: they redefine "homosexuality" to mean "sex with another guy",

.

What d'ya mean?
 
I've been wondering. I've read the bible multiple times but the only references I remember having to do peripherally with homosexuality or masturbation seemed to be specifically targeting males. Where is there anything about female homosexuality, female masturbation? Or is it interpreted to mean both - some of it seems too specific. Or maybe only gays are bad, not lesbians...
 
and 60 years ago the same sorts of people were making the same sorts of arguments against equal rights for blacks. I'm no apologist for gay people - my personal opinion is that they are an abomination and are going to rot, justifiably in hell. I see them trying to turn me gay. It makes my skin crawl. Thank God I'm not gay. I'm not! I know I'm not! Don't touch me like that! Not there, down lower!!!!
 
Wow, that's some seriously strong stupidity... do you expect anything less from Christianity?
to be fair, not all or even most Christians are like that. The peace and justice and turn the other cheek Christians like my sister who could not be sweeter or more tolerant.
 
What is it about cutesy cleverness ("God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve") that makes anybody think it proves anything?

That's a good question. Obvious stupidity does appeal to some mindsets, by boldly embracing fallacious ideas as truth we demonstrate our willingness to commit to any cause, no matter how idiotic, as long as it lines up conveniently with our prejudices and biases.

The appeal of "God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve" prolly comes in part because it endorses the fairy tale of some Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddy making a claymation model and then applying sooper-seekrit creator spells to make it come alive.

Christianity may have survived precisely because it is mind-numbingly stupid. Since it gives false answers to so many questions, those suffering from Jeebus-flavored religious delusions are relieved of a great deal of the terrible burden of thinking. When problems come up you can just roll out an idiotic sound bite, and you're done! No thinking, no worrying, and certainly no original ideas.

I always sort of half-wished I'd end up dating a guy named Adam.

Of course God made Adam and Eve = false in exactly the same way that God made Adam and Steve = false. The mass-murdering genocidal bastard would have to exist in order to be able to create anything. And judging from the fairy tale accounts of this deeply disturbed deity, there is a good chance that anything He did create would soon be destroyed in one of His legendary homicidal rages anyway. He sure does like condemning, killing, and then killing any survivors. The guy is worse than George Warcriminal Bush!

I'm certainly proud of not being a part of the Jeebus Lifestyle Choice.
 
to be fair, not all or even most Christians are like that. The peace and justice and turn the other cheek Christians like my sister who could not be sweeter or more tolerant.


It is often the christians who turn the other other cheek who come out screaming the loudest against homosexuality. Hypocrisy really twists my panties. :mad:


ETA: This is not a comment on your sister, who I am sure I would get along with just fine, it is a comment on the "turn the other cheek" phrase.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, most Christians are of course good.

What d'ya mean?
That homosexuality is the attraction to the same gender as you, not actually having sex with another guy (the term for that is "anal/oral sex", not "homosexuality). And that idiots have been trying to redefine the term "homosexuality" for ages before this Christian "task force" came along.
 
Oh. My. Pasta.


It's one long moronic diatride attmepting to justify their stance of sticking their noses into other peoples nethers because their chosen holy book -which must be truer than all the other holy books after all because, after all, they believe it- says that love is bad.

Which explains why the authors of the thing needed to force women into marriage...
 
Last edited:
I've been wondering. I've read the bible multiple times but the only references I remember having to do peripherally with homosexuality or masturbation seemed to be specifically targeting males. Where is there anything about female homosexuality, female masturbation? Or is it interpreted to mean both - some of it seems too specific. Or maybe only gays are bad, not lesbians...

I think the attitude of this particular patriarchal homophobe imaginary deity is very, very sexist. Why should he care about lesbians? Obviously without any penis involved 2 women can not possibly have teh seks! A friend has documented the many references in the Bible that show us God loves dick. Maybe the real reason God said we can't have teh geh seks is so that all the guys arriving in heaven will be homo-virginal and eligible for His harem. He is God, if he says that you are in the harem, guess what. I mean, sure, he did do a woman one time, but it was just to get her pregnant, honest.

Just like so many well disgraced TV Evangelists and Party of Jesus legislators, I think God forbids teh gay as a coverup so we won't guess.

When it comes to sexuality, God has no use for women, so why care what they do in bed?
 
Closet cases at christiananswers.net said:
The foundational teaching on marriage and sexual issues is found in Genesis chapters 1 and 2. When Jesus was questioned about marriage, He referred to these 2 chapters (Matthew 19:1-12; Mark 10:1-12). Genesis teaches us that “male and female He created them” (Genesis 1:27). We were created to a plan, male and female complementing each other. That is, God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, nor Madam and Eve.
Well if you love Jesus so much, why don't you marry him? Do you want to marry him? WELL YOU CAN'T! Now how does that make you feel?


I realize that about 1 or 2 people here will get that joke, but I just couldn't resist.
 

Back
Top Bottom