bagtaggar
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2005
- Messages
- 377
Challenged by a friend to examine the information under "Aries", the zodiac constellation assigned to my day of birth, I decided to perform a brief break down. He decided upon reading the first few sentences that I am a closed minded skeptic and too young to be commenting on such matters.
I can't wait till I'm older.
Now, I'm aware that this is actually just a "personality profile", and I use the word horoscope loosely (and jestingly). Enjoy!
Stanley Von Medvey takes on his horoscope.
Let's ignore for a moment that, when the original astrological charts where written by the Babylonians (approximately 4400 years ago), the Earth's pole was in a different orientation due to precession, and in fact all zodiac related horoscopes today are a full month off. Let's pretend that I am an "Aries". Below is my personality profile from "Astrology Online":
What follows is my sentence by sentence break down of the horoscope. Being to critical? Too analytical and skeptical one might say? Perhaps. But when it is enourmously unlikely (to the point of being rediculous) that astrology actually "works", using some ancient cosmic principle, one must look at the language itself and determine if this is all just a clever con or self-reinforcing dellusion. The world is a harsh place, and one must be harsh on the world to survive in it.
Aries
The spring equinox, March 21, is the beginning of the new zodiacal year and Aries, the first sign, is therefore that of new beginnings. A nice meaningless statement. The young ram is adventurous, ambitious, impulsive, enthusiastic and full of energy. I am very very tempted to swallow this, but a critical thinker must be critical of themselves sometimes. I am indeed adventurous, but I won't go sky diving or bungie jumping, nor am I all that interested in kinky, exotic forms of love making. Anyone can be "adventurous", it depends in what sense. I'm also far from impulsive, as is evidenced by my lack of things. I am far too fearful of failure to be impulsive, and I'm far too cheap to be an impulsive buyer. Impulsive is just about the opposite of what I am. I will grant that I am enthusiastic, although passionate may be a more accurate word. And, there are times during the day when I am energetic, but this is an illusion. I'm utterly spent at the end of the day. The Arian is a pioneer both in thought and action, very open to new ideas and a lover of freedom. This is mostly true, or, I'd like to think so. I've always been a bit of a rabble rouser intellectually, and tend to go against the grain. I'm not sure if that's "pioneering" or confounding. They welcome challenges and will not be diverted from their purpose except by their own impatience, which will surface if they don't get quick results. Half true, as practically every sentence thus far has been. Interesting, always a 50/50. It's a toss up really. Yes I do welcome challenges and I am not easily swayed from my goals, but I am far from impatient. In fact, patience is one of the virtues I pride myself in. Then again, maybe that's wishful thinking.
Aries subjects are courageous leaders with a genuine concern for those they command, being responsible people, it is rare that they will use their subordinates to obtain their own objectives as leaders, but occasionally it does happen. I have considered myself a good leader, and I have been voted into a number of various positions throughout the years by my peers for my leadership abilities. The part about using subordinates to obtain their own objectives is silly. It's a sentence designed to invoke an emotional response and cause you to mull it over in your head, slowly convincing yourself that it's true. It doesn't actually mean anything. What if your objectives are to better your subordinates? Or improve some condition? Or, what if you're a director (like me) and you're goal is to make your own movie? Leadership is far too multi-faceted to be described in such general terms. Again, 50/50. They do not make very good followers because they are too "take charge". They may be unwilling to obey or submit to directions for which they can see no reason, or with which they disagree. On the contrary, I make a very good "follower", if by follower you mean "subordinate". I just hate it, and look for every opportunity to be in a position of leadership. But I take my job responsibilities very seriously, no matter where on the hierarchy I am. This is not to say I don't offer suggestions from time to time. They are much concerned with self, both positively and negatively - self-reliant but also self centered (sometimes) and concerned with their own personal advancement and physical satisfaction. Sentence forced to make you generate moral judgement on yourself. You've been shown so much positive stuff that, it's only fair you get some "honesty". I am self reliant, to a degree, aside from the fact that my father pays for my rent and my girlfriend needs to kick my ass to remind me to clean my apartment and pay my bills. I am concerned with my own personal advancement, but then again, who the hell isn't? In order to love others one must first learn to love thyself. Again, 50/50, I guess. Their immense energy makes them aggressive and restless, argumentative occasionally, headstrong, quick tempered, easily offended and capable of holding grudges if they feel themselves affronted. Some have described me as having "immense energy" (not using those exact words though), I am fairly aggressive, I move in an our of being content and restless, and argumentative only when I feel there is something worthwhile arguing or someone is very clearly in the wrong (I hate arbitrary conflict and avoid it like the plague). I am definitely not quick tempered, perhaps quickly empassioned but never angry, and it takes quite a lot to offend me. I don't hold grudges, most things slide off me like water. Again, 50/50. Noticing a trend?
As the first sign in the zodiac, you, as an Arian (as you are referred to), is to simply "get something started and lead the way". Ok, vague but no reason to contest this. The Sun in this zodiac position gives your will free rein to express itself. Meaningless. The sun gives me free rein (sic) to express myself? That's possibly the most rediculous damn thing I've ever heard in my life. You could be doing this in the form of some leadership role, or by forcing others to look at themselves in a new way. Well, I suppose by writing this I'm hoping to change some minds. Ultimately a meaningless statement because of the preceding. You can accomplish this by knowingly carrying out a deliberate act in the name of some cause that moves you. I can accomplish free rein (sic) of expression by knowingly carrying out a deliberate act that moves me. Let's rephrase that. I can express myself by doing something. Wow, what cosmic knowledge! A negative effect of this sun sign is that you could sometimes unknowingly make it hard for others to relate to you, as you really are. I wonder how many people, Aries or not, have difficulty making people relate to them. I'm sure we all run across people at some point in our lives that simply won't see our point of view no matter what. Notice how it says "sometimes" and "unknowingly". Intentionally vague and silly language: 'sometimes' you won't 'knowingly' be aware of people who don't relate to you. What?!
In your personal relationships Arians are frank, direct and candid, and make enthusiastic and generous friends. Frank, direct, candid, enthusiastic, yes. Generous? Er... I'm kind of stingy.
I can't wait till I'm older.
Now, I'm aware that this is actually just a "personality profile", and I use the word horoscope loosely (and jestingly). Enjoy!
Stanley Von Medvey takes on his horoscope.
Let's ignore for a moment that, when the original astrological charts where written by the Babylonians (approximately 4400 years ago), the Earth's pole was in a different orientation due to precession, and in fact all zodiac related horoscopes today are a full month off. Let's pretend that I am an "Aries". Below is my personality profile from "Astrology Online":
What follows is my sentence by sentence break down of the horoscope. Being to critical? Too analytical and skeptical one might say? Perhaps. But when it is enourmously unlikely (to the point of being rediculous) that astrology actually "works", using some ancient cosmic principle, one must look at the language itself and determine if this is all just a clever con or self-reinforcing dellusion. The world is a harsh place, and one must be harsh on the world to survive in it.
Aries
The spring equinox, March 21, is the beginning of the new zodiacal year and Aries, the first sign, is therefore that of new beginnings. A nice meaningless statement. The young ram is adventurous, ambitious, impulsive, enthusiastic and full of energy. I am very very tempted to swallow this, but a critical thinker must be critical of themselves sometimes. I am indeed adventurous, but I won't go sky diving or bungie jumping, nor am I all that interested in kinky, exotic forms of love making. Anyone can be "adventurous", it depends in what sense. I'm also far from impulsive, as is evidenced by my lack of things. I am far too fearful of failure to be impulsive, and I'm far too cheap to be an impulsive buyer. Impulsive is just about the opposite of what I am. I will grant that I am enthusiastic, although passionate may be a more accurate word. And, there are times during the day when I am energetic, but this is an illusion. I'm utterly spent at the end of the day. The Arian is a pioneer both in thought and action, very open to new ideas and a lover of freedom. This is mostly true, or, I'd like to think so. I've always been a bit of a rabble rouser intellectually, and tend to go against the grain. I'm not sure if that's "pioneering" or confounding. They welcome challenges and will not be diverted from their purpose except by their own impatience, which will surface if they don't get quick results. Half true, as practically every sentence thus far has been. Interesting, always a 50/50. It's a toss up really. Yes I do welcome challenges and I am not easily swayed from my goals, but I am far from impatient. In fact, patience is one of the virtues I pride myself in. Then again, maybe that's wishful thinking.
Aries subjects are courageous leaders with a genuine concern for those they command, being responsible people, it is rare that they will use their subordinates to obtain their own objectives as leaders, but occasionally it does happen. I have considered myself a good leader, and I have been voted into a number of various positions throughout the years by my peers for my leadership abilities. The part about using subordinates to obtain their own objectives is silly. It's a sentence designed to invoke an emotional response and cause you to mull it over in your head, slowly convincing yourself that it's true. It doesn't actually mean anything. What if your objectives are to better your subordinates? Or improve some condition? Or, what if you're a director (like me) and you're goal is to make your own movie? Leadership is far too multi-faceted to be described in such general terms. Again, 50/50. They do not make very good followers because they are too "take charge". They may be unwilling to obey or submit to directions for which they can see no reason, or with which they disagree. On the contrary, I make a very good "follower", if by follower you mean "subordinate". I just hate it, and look for every opportunity to be in a position of leadership. But I take my job responsibilities very seriously, no matter where on the hierarchy I am. This is not to say I don't offer suggestions from time to time. They are much concerned with self, both positively and negatively - self-reliant but also self centered (sometimes) and concerned with their own personal advancement and physical satisfaction. Sentence forced to make you generate moral judgement on yourself. You've been shown so much positive stuff that, it's only fair you get some "honesty". I am self reliant, to a degree, aside from the fact that my father pays for my rent and my girlfriend needs to kick my ass to remind me to clean my apartment and pay my bills. I am concerned with my own personal advancement, but then again, who the hell isn't? In order to love others one must first learn to love thyself. Again, 50/50, I guess. Their immense energy makes them aggressive and restless, argumentative occasionally, headstrong, quick tempered, easily offended and capable of holding grudges if they feel themselves affronted. Some have described me as having "immense energy" (not using those exact words though), I am fairly aggressive, I move in an our of being content and restless, and argumentative only when I feel there is something worthwhile arguing or someone is very clearly in the wrong (I hate arbitrary conflict and avoid it like the plague). I am definitely not quick tempered, perhaps quickly empassioned but never angry, and it takes quite a lot to offend me. I don't hold grudges, most things slide off me like water. Again, 50/50. Noticing a trend?
As the first sign in the zodiac, you, as an Arian (as you are referred to), is to simply "get something started and lead the way". Ok, vague but no reason to contest this. The Sun in this zodiac position gives your will free rein to express itself. Meaningless. The sun gives me free rein (sic) to express myself? That's possibly the most rediculous damn thing I've ever heard in my life. You could be doing this in the form of some leadership role, or by forcing others to look at themselves in a new way. Well, I suppose by writing this I'm hoping to change some minds. Ultimately a meaningless statement because of the preceding. You can accomplish this by knowingly carrying out a deliberate act in the name of some cause that moves you. I can accomplish free rein (sic) of expression by knowingly carrying out a deliberate act that moves me. Let's rephrase that. I can express myself by doing something. Wow, what cosmic knowledge! A negative effect of this sun sign is that you could sometimes unknowingly make it hard for others to relate to you, as you really are. I wonder how many people, Aries or not, have difficulty making people relate to them. I'm sure we all run across people at some point in our lives that simply won't see our point of view no matter what. Notice how it says "sometimes" and "unknowingly". Intentionally vague and silly language: 'sometimes' you won't 'knowingly' be aware of people who don't relate to you. What?!
In your personal relationships Arians are frank, direct and candid, and make enthusiastic and generous friends. Frank, direct, candid, enthusiastic, yes. Generous? Er... I'm kind of stingy.
Last edited: