I do believe I've found something more extreme than Rapture Ready

c4ts

Philosopher
C
Joined
Jul 17, 2002
Messages
8,420
http://biblocality.com/forums/showthread.php?t=495

Originally Posted by sykoskakid
since they had the same parent, does this mean Cain and Abel are soons born from incest? also, who did they mate with?

They don't have the same parent. Sorry to burst your bubble. Why overassume? They mated with each other: Adam and Eve beget Cain and Abel and other children.

The first Adamic man came from the dust (Gen. 2.7) of pre-adamic men and women. The sin in reading the Scriptures is to always overassume. Since you overassumed, this is belligerent, so you are banned.
Click to expand...
 
Here's a good one from their rules:

This may seem counter-intuitive, but if you post something from another writer as your own, this is not plagarizing as long as you believe it and want to express this very point as your own, for the sake of expressing a point precisely and with care. Therefore, it is a sin to accuse someone of plagarizing. This will not be tolerated. Citing the source is optional for the sake of the conversation.
Click to expand...

:dl:
 
:jaw-dropp

Did ya see this thread?

Here's the gist:

Admin: Here's my long-winded obfuscating proof of God.
Poster #1: Here's why I don't think you're right.
Admin: You don't understand my proof. You're banned.
Poster #2: Here's why I don't think you're right.
Admin: You don't understand my proof. You're banned.
 
I went there myself and found an even better gem.

Mysticmike,

You are banned because, though you may be saved, you refuse to repent from your rejecting what is scientifically fact, that the universe is billions of years old. You make the church look ridiculous when you say it is not true what is scientifically proven beyond a doubt. Already deciding for yourself lacking adequate information, is this humble of you?

Sometimes those need to be cast out of the fellowship of the church to repent, to be let back in later if they can repent. Read Mystery of Creation to help you, which you say you do not have this information yet.

I believe this is a good thing to do because you are so stiff in your position. I love you, and if I did not, I would not do help you along in this way.
smile.gif
Click to expand...

Banned for refusal to accept evidence of the age of the universe? Now that's interesting. I wonder though, if there isn't some special refusal to accept the nature of reality that this little admin may be guilty of that makes him worthy of a banning?

Also, I find it hilarious that he found a way to label simply asking a question an act of belligerance.
 
He bans people for asking questions. He bans people for making simple observations.:boggled:
 
That's the most hilarious thread I've read in a long time. If you reply to him, you're banned!
 
You can join if you want, but you will get banned if you try to reason with him. Doesn't seem like it's worth the trouble.
 
"Moreover, I do not want to your flesh to rampage further, so you are banned."
"I had to ban you because your other post was insanely reviling. I just had to do the same thing with "clide" also as his reviling is causing him mental anguish with mindless self-declarations."
"You are banned for retardation."
"You're banned for your own benefit to stop rationalize yourself and your errors..."

But this one has to be my favourite...

"You are banned. You are not a Christian for Christians don't accuse brothers and sisters in Christ of being non-Christian."

:dl:
 
Google his name First Name: Troy then last name:Brooks and "apostle". (Split to help keep him from googling himself and winding up here) Even the fundies think he's a nut.
 
I joined and was banned in about 30 seconds before I had even posted.


You have been banned for the following reason:
no junkie
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
Click to expand...

I am not entirely sure what that is supposed to mean. Either the admin believed me to be on drugs or referred to my entire existance as "junk". I will say I answered the questions honestly. Meaning, the only "yes" was to the question about if I thought tongues were just mindless jibberish to manipulate people. Yes to the first part and "sometimes" to the second part.

​
Edit: Haha, they go pretty far. My IP address is banned as well.
 
Last edited:
Dark Jaguar said:
I joined and was banned in about 30 seconds before I had even posted.




I am not entirely sure what that is supposed to mean. Either the admin believed me to be on drugs or referred to my entire existance as "junk". I will say I answered the questions honestly. Meaning, the only "yes" was to the question about if I thought tongues were just mindless jibberish to manipulate people. Yes to the first part and "sometimes" to the second part.

​
Edit: Haha, they go pretty far. My IP address is banned as well.
Click to expand...
What was your attempted user name? Dark Jaguar?
 
Freethinker said:
Google his name First Name: Troy then last name:Brooks and "apostle". (Split to help keep him from googling himself and winding up here) Even the fundies think he's a nut.
Click to expand...

Seems like he's from Alberta, Canada. Also in the news, all 24 ridings from Alberta went to the Conservatives in the recent election.
 
Yes, and that's another consideration. After all, jaguars aren't in the bible (which I pronounce with a soft I for my own personal entertainment these days).
 
All this banning reminds me of the Soup Nazi from Seinfeld.

NO SOUP FOR YOU!

-Bri
 
31. Do you believe God discloses the size of the new city to indicate how few are actually saved; 1.2 billion souls would be a reasonable estimated upper limit according to the population and space given, 1500 x 1500 miles with walls 216 feet high?
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
 
I'll say this. There's another reason I find it amusing. It is the equivilent of a bum banning people from entering that bum's personal dumpster.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom