• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hypnosis in MDC?

Professor Yaffle

Butterbeans and Breadcrumbs
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
17,746
Location
Emily's shop
I found this posted recently on a woo site.

Take my profession for example. At one time "The Amazing Randi" lumped hypnosis in with his million dollar challenge. As people began to wake up and turn back to older, more natural, methods of healing, hypnosis and all it can do has become mainstream. Suddenly hypnosis was simply removed from his list. Don't remember anyone ever getting the million.

Anyone tell me what the truth is regarding this?
 
Given that Randi spoke negatively of hypnosis in Swift as late as February of this year (in the February 8th edition of Swift, to be more precise. I would link it but I lack the sufficient amount of posts to post URLs at this time) I would doubt the claim. Also, a quick read of the million dollar challenge application shows no mention of hypnosis.
IMPORTANT: Only claims that can be verified by evidence under proper observing conditions will be accepted. Also, JREF will NOT accept claims of the existence of deities or demons/angels, the validity of exorcism, religious claims, cloudbusting, causing the Sun to rise or the stars to move, etc. JREF will also NOT test claims that are likely to cause injury of any sort, such as those involving the withholding of air, food or water, or the use of illicit materials, drugs, or dangerous devices.

Hypnosis is absent from the list of off-limits claims.
 
Given that hypnosis is supposed to involve a changed mental state, I think it would be pretty difficult to design a mutually-agreeable protocol to test it.

Challenge Applicant: "Behold! She's flapping her arms and quacking like a duck! That proves she thinks she's a duck because of hypnosis!"
Tester: "No, that proves simply that she can flap her arms and quack like a duck."

There's really only one proper way to test the above:

[Monty]
BEDEVERE: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
VILLAGER #2: Burn!
VILLAGER #1: Burn!
CROWD: Burn! Burn them up! Burn!...
BEDEVERE: And what do you burn apart from witches?
VILLAGER #1: More witches!
VILLAGER #3: Shh!
VILLAGER #2: Wood!
BEDEVERE: So, why do witches burn?

[pause]

VILLAGER #3: B--... 'cause they're made of... wood?
BEDEVERE: Good! Heh heh.
CROWD: Oh, yeah. Oh.
BEDEVERE: So, how do we tell whether she is made of wood?
VILLAGER #1: Build a bridge out of her.
BEDEVERE: Ah, but can you not also make bridges out of stone?
VILLAGER #1: Oh, yeah.
RANDOM: Oh, yeah. True. Uhh...
BEDEVERE: Does wood sink in water?
VILLAGER #1: No. No.
VILLAGER #2: No, it floats! It floats!
VILLAGER #1: Throw her into the pond!
CROWD: The pond! Throw her into the pond!
BEDEVERE: What also floats in water?
VILLAGER #1: Bread!
VILLAGER #2: Apples!
VILLAGER #3: Uh, very small rocks!
VILLAGER #1: Cider!
VILLAGER #2: Uh, gra-- gravy!
VILLAGER #1: Cherries!
VILLAGER #2: Mud!
VILLAGER #3: Uh, churches! Churches!
VILLAGER #2: Lead! Lead!
ARTHUR: A duck!
CROWD: Oooh.
BEDEVERE: Exactly. So, logically...
VILLAGER #1: If... she... weighs... the same as a duck,... she's made of wood.
BEDEVERE: And therefore?
VILLAGER #2: A witch!
[/Grail]
Oh, wait, that's to see if she's a witch, not a duck.

Sorry. Carry on.
 
personally I think that all along randi would include certain claims of hypnosis and exclude others. Probably some people applied with some claims for hypnosis and they were deemed non paranormal, and this is where this person got the idea that Randi had changed his mind.
 
"In any case, hypnosis is merely an agreement between the subject and the operator that they will fantasize together, nothing more. It may well have some limited value as a psychiatric tool, but it's not a "power," it's not a "force," it's a role-playing game [...]"
-Randi

Source
 
Last edited:
Depending on who you ask, hypnosis is supposed to have various sorts of power. As a stupid example, illusionists often put their assistant in "hypnotic transe" before making them levitate or otherwise defy natural laws.

So if someone claims that hypnosis can, say, allow people to go through an out of body experience that would allow them to retrieve information from an otherwise unaccessible source (a piece of paper locked inside a safe, as an example), then it would most definitely qualify for the challenge (disclaimer: based on what I know of the challenge. I have no ties whatsoever to the JREF). If it allowed them to regress to a "past life", then it is impossible to verify, both because lots of information would be downright impossible to check and because the rest of the information gained from this "regression" could have been acquired through other, perfectly normal means.

So to my understanding, let's agree first on what kind of things hypnosis make possible that is paranormal, then we'll see if it qualifies for the challenge. :)
 
What Oualawouzou said.

It depends on what the claimant is claiming. Some of them are paranormal claims and can be tested.

Most of the other claims (non paranormal) usually dissolve into the very trivial (or false) upon examination.
 
I have put people in a hypnotic trance. Or, more accurately, have helped people allow themselves to go into a trance.

Let me explain my viewpoint:

There is NOTHING magical about hypnosis. It's all focus, imagination and positive reinforcement. I explain it to others like this:

If you've ever been to a movie, or have read a book and have gotten so into the movie or book you almost forget you are in a theater, or have forgotten the time, or people say "Hey!!" several times before you respond. Or if you've been driving a familiar route and it's a long drive. Suddenly, you look around and say to yourself "Wow! I'm here already???"

All of those are exactly the same kind of a "trance" as a hypnotic one. Just concentration and focus.

People do what is suggested to them in this concentration simply because a) they want to. b) they are focused on the task given to them.

There's no magic, you can't make any appendage bigger, can't make you remember your past lives, etc. However, if the subject really wants larger appendages or wants to believe they're abducted by aliens, then the hypnosis will convince them that their "memories" are true. But then again, any cold-reading "psychic" can do the same thing.

As to helping people lose weight or stop smoking, the trick to make that work is to keep reinforcing the hypnosis and giving positive reinforcement whenever the subject does the desired behavior. If the subject doesn't do the desired behavior or does something wrong, then you still do a hypnotic session but there is no reinforcement. This is called conditioning. We, as individuals, do it all the time.

Now there are many different ways to achieve this focus. None of them are magical, all of them are easily explained away if you've studied your basic college psychology, and all of them are ways we do it to ourselves naturally.

I'm basically saying that there is a state of mind reached, but it's simple intense focus. Nothing magical or paranormal. Nothing to try to prove the million dollar challenge, because, quite frankly, it's all easily explained away and nothing really special happens.

In fact, by reading this post, technically you were in a hypnotic trance. :-) See how easy that was?
 

Back
Top Bottom