tonygraham
Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2001
- Messages
- 224
Did anybody else see this in The New Scientist? Unfortunately, I'm having trouble with my online access, so I can't be too specific on the details at the moment but the thrust of it was that a large number of people may be carrying more than one genetic code.
Apparently, what happens is that non-identical twins merge at the blastula (ball of cells) stage and cells from each then go on to develop into different tissues. So it is possible that the cells of your kidney are carrying a different set of genes from the set your liver cells are carrying, for example.
This has obvious and profound implications for a variety of subjects - paternity testing, individualised medicines, forensics, etc.
If I remember correctly, it came to light following something like a paternity test, during which DNA comparison showed that the mother couldn't be a parent of the child, which she definitely was. When they tested her DNA using a sample of a different tissue, they found a different gene makeup.
Interesting, eh?
Apparently, what happens is that non-identical twins merge at the blastula (ball of cells) stage and cells from each then go on to develop into different tissues. So it is possible that the cells of your kidney are carrying a different set of genes from the set your liver cells are carrying, for example.
This has obvious and profound implications for a variety of subjects - paternity testing, individualised medicines, forensics, etc.
If I remember correctly, it came to light following something like a paternity test, during which DNA comparison showed that the mother couldn't be a parent of the child, which she definitely was. When they tested her DNA using a sample of a different tissue, they found a different gene makeup.
Interesting, eh?