How to resolve the idealism-materialism dispute ?

I have no idea what you're proposing. That said, you can't bridge the gap between materialism and idealism. One is real. The other is imaginary. Philosophical idealism is the academic equivalent of navel gazing.
 
Can't decide whether to report this for flooding, spamming, or general gibberishness that would be an off-topic derail if it paid nodding acquaintance to the topic in the first place.
 
Also, a detailed explanation of how to verify a " past incarnation " in a scientific way.

Then why if you were Comte in a past incarnation that you would regard your own work in the theory as if it wasn't yours.
 
Also, a detailed explanation of how to verify a " past incarnation " in a scientific way.

Then why if you were Comte in a past incarnation that you would regard your own work in the theory as if it wasn't yours.
I was Aristuppes or maybe Caligula.
 
I don't see any reconciliation between materialism and idealism in the linked text. Just a proposed name for what such a reconciliation might be called (ideomaterialism). That's not the hard part, you know.
 

Back
Top Bottom