• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

How do you skeptics feel about this?

I thought the numer was 20, with one backing out.

Oh, and there was that group called Al-Quaida that supported them in their planning. Maybe you've heard of them?
 
I don't know I just see such strong support from both sides of the fence, and people always saying (the ones that blame bush) that scientifically it couldn't of just been a single plane to take down such a large building.
Now I know the critical thinkers at jref for the most part know their science, is this true? Is there any scientifical evidence to support this professors claims?
 
Plastictowel said:
I don't know I just see such strong support from both sides of the fence, and people always saying (the ones that blame bush) that scientifically it couldn't of just been a single plane to take down such a large building.
Now I know the critical thinkers at jref for the most part know their science, is this true? Is there any scientifical evidence to support this professors claims?
Click to expand...

The short answer is yes, the science does point to one plane being able to take such a building down.

For the evidence, you'll want to look at the conspiracy theory section of the this forum.
 
Plastictowel said:
And those little "extra explosions" they point out upon the decent?
Click to expand...

Air pressure forcing debris and smokeout through weakpoints/openings in the structure.

Loose Change Guide: http://www.loosechangeguide.com/
9/11 Deniers Speak: http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
Screw Loose Change Blog: http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com
9/11 Myths: http://www.911myths.com/
Debunking 9/11: http://www.debunking911.com/
Internet Detectives: http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change

ETA:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=r...PHhDo3QoALImaiMBA&sig2=k29dgwYq4F0RvDFt5J23xw
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
http://www.ara.com/arasvo/NIST_WTC.htm
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/
 
Last edited:
The conspiracy nuts have nothing supporting their contentions but their own personal incredulity.

Terrorists hijacked airplanes, crashed them into buildings and brought the towers down. The evidence is overwhelming. We know why it happened and we know how it happened. The science is clear. There is no rational reason to buy into any of these nutjobs' theories.
 
Quote from Barrett: "I'm interested in training people how to use critical thinking skills..."

The irony would be delicious if it wasn't so infuriating. This idiot is a college prof.
 
HeyLeroy said:
I thought the numer was 20, with one backing out.

Oh, and there was that group called Al-Quaida that supported them in their planning. Maybe you've heard of them?
Click to expand...

Correct, it was 19 hijackers, I believe Moussaoui was to be #20.
 
And ANOTHER thing...

Jerks like Barrett do a TREMENDOUS disservice to those of us who are otherwise sympathetic to the overall message that the NeoCons, while clearly not orchestrating 9/11, have cynically exploited it to advance a pre-existing agenda. It doesn't do anyone any good to mix truth with BS, destroying the credibility of legitimate beefs that many of us have with the current administation.
 
Last edited:
Fox News sucks. I really hate the way their interviewers badger people. I'm getting madder about it as the video plays. I like how this guy (Barrett) stands up to Fox idiocy. But, he's still wrong, in my opinion.

He's really pegging them! The Fox dude said "silence the conservative viewpoint"! :D
 
Last edited:
Yeah that's partially why I brought it up. I despise fox news, and I especially despise Steve (the man doing the debate that just keeps muttering "you're nuts, crazy, idiot, nuts, nuts, pecans, nuts" ). It's people like that that make me strongly question our government, and who the hell is really running it, I suppose that's what sparked my interest in 9/11 being a conspiracy.
 
Plastictowel said:
Yeah that's partially why I brought it up. I despise fox news, and I especially despise Steve (the man doing the debate that just keeps muttering "you're nuts, crazy, idiot, nuts, nuts, pecans, nuts" ). It's people like that that make me strongly question our government, and who the hell is really running it, I suppose that's what sparked my interest in 9/11 being a conspiracy.
Click to expand...

As you have been told, essentially there is no science (chemistry, physics, engineering or other) on the CTers side. As a person who loathes Shrub, if I had the slightest possibility of showing him involved in something like that, I would be on it in an instant - but there is simply nothing there.
 
Plastictowel said:
I don't know I just see such strong support from both sides of the fence, and people always saying (the ones that blame bush) that scientifically it couldn't of just been a single plane to take down such a large building.
Click to expand...

Bush has an awful lot to answer for. :mad:

That doesn't mean that he or his lackeys personally flew a plane into the WTC. There are some of us who blame Bush for a lot, but don't see a lot of good scientific evidence for anything other than the official story. It is most likely that Al Qaeda was, in fact, responsible. Bush is only responsible for what happened afterward...

That message seems to be lost in the noise from the CTs.
 
Bonus irony.

Barrett wants to teach all the possible theories of 9/11 in a classroom and Hannity opposes it.

Behe wants to teach all the possible theories of biology and Hannity is for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom