Hide the fossils, says Kenyan Bishop

Doesn't this seem like an implicit admission of the strength of the evidence...?
 
The mighty institution of African Science marches on...

This reminds me of when the Israelis pulled out of Gaza and left behind a number of greenhouses for the Palestinians to begin using to grow crops. The Palestinians were so crazy that they destroyed the greenhouses as soon as they arrived. Something about noses, knives, and facial spite, I think...
 
This fits in good with the Pope telling Europeans to be more like Africans in regards to science.
 
Nice to see that they still have no idea what they are talking about.

'When museums put it out there that man evolved from apes....' says Bishop Adoyo.

.
.
 
This is one which REALLY pisses me off. Kenya should be the richest and biggest exporter of food in Africa, but thanks to 100% corruption rate, half the country faces famine.

And now here we are with another absurdly hypocritical piece of religious puke, worrying about whether Kenyans might think evolution is real instead of getting his church to try and alleviate some of the real issues facing his people. And people wonder why I'm at war with christianity.
 
Kenyan Bishop Boniface Adoyo has called for fossil displays in museums to be removed from display, because they make people believe in evolution.
I seem to remember Ned Flanders doing the same on the telly a couple of days ago...
 
This fits in good with the Pope telling Europeans to be more like Africans in regards to science.

I liked the Washington Post article. The first few paragraphs just said it all...

Faith fading in rich world, alive in poor: Pope

MUNICH, Germany (Reuters) - Western societies are losing their souls to scientific rationality and frightening believers in the developing world who still fear God, Pope Benedict told an open-air mass in Germany on Sunday.

Benedict, on the second day of a visit to his native Bavaria, said that spreading the word of Jesus Christ was more important than all the emergency and development aid that rich churches like those in Germany gave to poor countries.

So "faith is fading in the rich world, alive in the poor"... Now I know correlation don't prove causation, but you've got to wonder...

And if we're "losing [our] souls to scientific rationality", isn't this implying that he views the path to God as being unscientific and/or irrational?

Finally, "the word of Jesus Christ was more important than all the emergency and development aid"! And here I was thinking all those refugees, famine victims, etc. would benefit more from bread than bibles. Damn my rationality! Or perhaps, damned by it?
 
And if we're "losing [our] souls to scientific rationality", isn't this implying that he views the path to God as being unscientific and/or irrational?
I say yes. But if you were to ask this question of Pope Ratzi, I think he'd say you have scientific rationality on one hand and Catholic rationality on the other. Kind of like what the church said to Galileo.
 
f you were to ask this question of Pope Ratzi, I think he'd say you have scientific rationality on one hand and Catholic rationality on the other.


But apparantly 'Catholic rationality' says that what desperate, starving people most urgently need is a crate full of bibles and a few missionaries. I suppose at a stretch it gives them something to burn and something to eat. I'm just not sure which is which.
:D
 
But apparantly 'Catholic rationality' says that what desperate, starving people most urgently need is a crate full of bibles and a few missionaries. I suppose at a stretch it gives them something to burn and something to eat. I'm just not sure which is which.
:D
The church can much more readily promise eternal salvation than it can provide earthly sustenance. Under those circumstances, why would they take any other approach?!?
 
Finally, "the word of Jesus Christ was more important than all the emergency and development aid"! And here I was thinking all those refugees, famine victims, etc. would benefit more from bread than bibles.

Mother Teresa never thought so...
 
And here I was thinking all those refugees, famine victims, etc. would benefit more from bread than bibles. Damn my rationality! Or perhaps, damned by it?

There was a fabulous Onion article on just this a few weeks back. Something about "Desperately needed Bibles sent to starving Africans".

It would have been more funny were it not so sad.
 
However, it is this display that African evangelicals say they find offensive, because it promotes Darwin's theory of evolution. As a result, they are demanding that the display be removed or at least shunted to a less prominent location.


I think the display of church signs is offensive, because it promotes the religious stance that God created man. As a result, I am demanding that all churches be removed or at least shunted to a less prominent location.


Why should my demand be any less reasonable than theirs?
 
Mother Teresa never thought so...

Oh yes she did. Thank Bob the evil old hag is dead - she must rank as the worst murderess in history. Thousands of lepers and tuberculitic victims died at her hands.

She could have simply taken them to her local hospital to obtain the antibiotics which treat TB, but no, the hideous hag gave them a bed to die in. Oh, and she prayed for them. Bet that helped as they coughed their lungs out!

And now the Pope wants to give bibles before food - two identically insane positions from the same insane church. The church is fast-tracking her beatification, I would have hung the bitch.
 
Oh yes she did. Thank Bob the evil old hag is dead - she must rank as the worst murderess in history. Thousands of lepers and tuberculitic victims died at her hands.

She could have simply taken them to her local hospital to obtain the antibiotics which treat TB, but no, the hideous hag gave them a bed to die in. Oh, and she prayed for them. Bet that helped as they coughed their lungs out!

And now the Pope wants to give bibles before food - two identically insane positions from the same insane church. The church is fast-tracking her beatification, I would have hung the bitch.
With a handle like "The Atheist", I assume that I know where you're coming from, but you must realize that this is a complete misunderstanding of the situation. She was no woo practitioner taking patients away from conventional medicine; her missionary society opened hospices and leper houses for people who could not go to a hospital, being members of the Untouchable caste. Hospitals simply wouldn't allow them in.

Nobody died because of her. Nobody went to her to be prayed for instead of going to a doctor--you are misunderstanding this. As Untouchables they were completely invisible to the medical establishment of India. Medical care simply was not available to them, period.

No, she could not have "taken them to the hospital to obtain antibiotics", because the hospital would have literally, physically, prevented her from bringing them inside. And they certainly would not have dispensed antibiotics at the door to Untouchables in the street, like a McDonalds drive-thru.

Which was kind of the whole point of her entire ministry: she ministered to people who, literally, had nowhere else to go. Without her, they simply died in the streets like animals. She at least gave them compassion and dignity.

Perhaps you might spare your anti-Christian vitriol for those who truly deserve it. ;) How 'bout the Vatican, with their wealth and their coverups?
 

Back
Top Bottom