homunculus
Scholar
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2002
- Messages
- 92
I've posted about the problem- and solution-centred approach to philosophy/science etc. before, but a recent conversation (on IRC) with a Christian fundamentalist, got me thinking again. Among other fictions, this guy fervently believed in Demons (which he "described" as "fallen angels" - as if that clarifies anything!)
The questions I put him were, "How do you recognise a Demon when you see one?" and, "What criteria/procedures can separate genuine cases of posession, from (say) schizoid delusions?"
His replies were infuriating. After flatly proclaiming that Scripture was his only guide, and having me point out (very politely!) that this did not answer my questions, he eventually lost his temper, accusing me of being "foolish" since Demons can "assume any form or likeness" to decieve us...
Now, to this I had a (very reasonable, I thought) retort. He had effectively just admitted that there could not possibly be any way to tell ordinary, natural states of affairs from Demonic, supernatural ones (Demons, after all, can assume any form or likeness). From which follows, that despite all his confabulation, he had no idea "what" a Demon is, how such a thing might interact with our world, how we might spot one when it does...or anything, really...
Which made all his talk about "Demons" just empty word-strings, mere exhaust. What real-world observations could possibly evidence an entity neither of us could understand - and which apparently could be anywhere, any time, any thing! What actual facts might constitute a problem which this "Demon" explanation would solve?
All this could equally be applied to the gods, of course, or "life force", or "Earth energy" or "ghosts", or any of the other woo-woo favourites...
Paul.
The questions I put him were, "How do you recognise a Demon when you see one?" and, "What criteria/procedures can separate genuine cases of posession, from (say) schizoid delusions?"
His replies were infuriating. After flatly proclaiming that Scripture was his only guide, and having me point out (very politely!) that this did not answer my questions, he eventually lost his temper, accusing me of being "foolish" since Demons can "assume any form or likeness" to decieve us...
Now, to this I had a (very reasonable, I thought) retort. He had effectively just admitted that there could not possibly be any way to tell ordinary, natural states of affairs from Demonic, supernatural ones (Demons, after all, can assume any form or likeness). From which follows, that despite all his confabulation, he had no idea "what" a Demon is, how such a thing might interact with our world, how we might spot one when it does...or anything, really...
Which made all his talk about "Demons" just empty word-strings, mere exhaust. What real-world observations could possibly evidence an entity neither of us could understand - and which apparently could be anywhere, any time, any thing! What actual facts might constitute a problem which this "Demon" explanation would solve?
All this could equally be applied to the gods, of course, or "life force", or "Earth energy" or "ghosts", or any of the other woo-woo favourites...
Paul.
