• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Happy 30th birthday, Dylan Avery

I wonder where he hides these days? Pity he never became the social pariah that Charlie Veitch became after he changed his mind, but then I guess Charlie's was a lot more public..
 
I was worried that I shared a birthday with him, but mine is the 2nd and 20 years earlier.
 
cjnewson88 said:
I wonder where he hides these days? Pity he never became the social pariah that Charlie Veitch became after he changed his mind, but then I guess Charlie's was a lot more public..
Click to expand...

Dylan also did it a lot more sly. He didn't say he believed the "official story" he just said he doesn't subscribe to 911 theories as he presented them in Loose Change. He's still well open to LIHOP, 'deep politics' and other crap.
 
Happy birthday scumbag. Hey, did he ever apologize to that one man he accused of sending his son to his death on one of the doomed flights? I can't recall the name right now.
 
kookbreaker said:
Dylan also did it a lot more sly. He didn't say he believed the "official story" he just said he doesn't subscribe to 911 theories as he presented them in Loose Change. He's still well open to LIHOP, 'deep politics' and other crap.
Click to expand...

From my understanding, Avery recanted and said it was beyond the scope of The Bush Administration to pull it off. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Some may be surprised to hear this, but I bear Dylan, Korey and Jason no ill will. They were young men who bought into a conspiracy theory, and put together a product that regurgitated the lies of people like David Ray Griffin, who really ought to know better. Young people particularly can find conspiracy theories seductive, because a) it's reinforced with TV and movies, and b) they are not sophisticated enough to see how flimsy the evidence really is.
 
Brainster said:
Some may be surprised to hear this, but I bear Dylan, Korey and Jason no ill will. They were young men who bought into a conspiracy theory,
Click to expand...
,,,

BS!
They knew better, because it was shown to them re-repeatedly! On their own forum, and here to infinity! Yet, milked the cow dry!
 
Brainster said:
Some may be surprised to hear this, but I bear Dylan, Korey and Jason no ill will. They were young men who bought into a conspiracy theory, and put together a product that regurgitated the lies of people like David Ray Griffin, who really ought to know better. Young people particularly can find conspiracy theories seductive, because a) it's reinforced with TV and movies, and b) they are not sophisticated enough to see how flimsy the evidence really is.
Click to expand...

I, on the other hand, bear them much ill will. If they were to come forward and apologize and recant everything they ever said, then we could talk. Until then, they are bottom feeding scum.
 
So who do you think was / were the main people who seeded the truth movement? David Griffin? If so he's got some recanting to do.
 
JSanderO said:
So who do you think was / were the main people who seeded the truth movement? David Griffin? If so he's got some recanting to do.
Click to expand...

He absolutely does, along with every other despicable, low life twoofer that was involved in any way, shape, or form of that "Truth" movement.
 
JSanderO said:
So who do you think was / were the main people who seeded the truth movement? David Griffin? If so he's got some recanting to do.
Click to expand...

I have given that a lot of thought, the question of who is to blame for it. From what I remember I traced Griffin's ignorance back to him reading Mike Rivero's website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWqO6i_x0MY
So it looks like we can blame Rivero for getting Griffin started (see video)

The REALLY annoying thing is how the top gurus of this BS refuse to even respond to me.

And one of the early ones is Eric Hufschmid who is illogical. Look even at other topics like risking death with his undercooking or "low temp cooking" scheme. I have emailed a biologist to help me identify what Eric is talking about in his video "Spontaneous Creation Part 2" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fso0FynwVgU when he mentions a "tick like" insect. I would like to make a video exposing his take on things and I need more info about the insect he seems to think he has discovered himself because he writes "Why not let biology students study them for practice?" in the video description which begs the question, what is stopping them. It seems to me that Eric thinks he is the first to discover the "tick like creature" on the leg of a bee. He has the video posted as "Education" yet he doesn't identify what he insect is, he doesn't give its species. As I wait for a reply from biologists, does anyone here know the answers to Eric's questions in his latest video?

But going back even before that are the people who planted the seeds by deceptively suppressing or misdirecting from WHY the attack was perpetrated. ( http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-911-misdirection-away-from-why-and.html ) So even before Mike Rivero and Eric Hufschmid, we had Dan Rather both suppressing the motive on live TV and creating a focus on WTC 7 when focusing on it as he did made no sense. He managed to misidentify the start of the collapse and was planting seeds of "like controlled demolition" and saying weird stuff like "amazing, incredible, pick your word, for the third time today. It's reminiscent of those pictures we've all see too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down." " (why exactly are we supposed to lament controlled demolitions? "reminiscent of those pictures we've all see too much on television" we have see them "too much"? Do you see what he did? planting the idea that CDs are things we are to regret?) I think self-consiousness about knowing he was playing a game that day of suppressing the motive (specifically of not reading "Israel" in the newswire: http://youtu.be/95ncn5Q16N4?t=3m22s ) probably drove him to comment so much on an unimportant building)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom