Good news! You cant catch HIV

From that thread, Broodlinger wrote:
Awesome yes! We have a movie. Thank you!!

Apparently that settles it. Someone made a movie; it must be true.:boggled: :eek:

Steve S.
 
They for the most part live in first world countries. If they sought treatment they would have quite a lot of years to live.
 
The "researcher" in question says he will inject himself with HIV if a competing researcher will inject him or herself with AZT. I hereby announce my new career as an HIV/AIDS researcher, and I request that he set a date to make good on his promise, the sooner the better.
 
The "researcher" in question says he will inject himself with HIV if a competing researcher will inject him or herself with AZT. I hereby announce my new career as an HIV/AIDS researcher, and I request that he set a date to make good on his promise, the sooner the better.

Actually, the deal was 1 HIV injection for a lifetime HAART program, which is very aggressive chemo.

If he would modify this to a two-year HAART program, or if I could stop the program if he develops AIDS, I would accept it. In other words: reasonable conditions. But I doubt he'd do that.
 
Medical ethics would prevent any researcher from allowing anyone to knowingly infect themselves with HIV or being unknowingly infected for an experiment...
 
AIDS denyers make the same mistake that creationists make, they inflate the burden of evidence to the point that nothing would pass it and fail to place those standards on their own ideas. If the arguments they use were applied to other diseases, one could refute the entire germ theory of disease. The correllation between HIV and AIDS is well established medically. AIDS denyers are @$$#013$, homophobes (they want AIDS to remain God's punishment for homosexuality), gullible, or all of the above.
 
Is it just me, or does "Duesberg" sound a lot like "douchebag"..?

To me, "Duesberg" sounds like "deuce-berg." Like "iceberg," except "deuce" in the place of "ice." In other words, like a floating piece of...
 
Hence the reason that all US universities and research institutes have an IRB board, they will force you to have them...

Only if they can figure out what you are up to.
 
Ok, let's say that one of the loosers catches the bug and refuses treatment.
If I remember correctly, this means an approximately 12 years (highly generalised since it varies from case to case) "hiatus" of the virus before the immune system shuts down either patially or completely, am I correct?
Granted, it's been a while, but I seem to recall this from when the disease were first discovered.....
 
This whole HIV/AIDS link insanity was done by the government of South Africa about five years ago. The dissenting view, as exemplified by Duesberg, was used as sufficient grounds for withholding ARVs and derailing plans for a properly coordinated prevention and treatment campaign. The medical community was stunned to learn that the state president, Thabo Mbeki, had overnight become the ultimate authority regarding this and related questions. This stance meshed neatly with the authories' collective view that the spread of AIDS was the result of poverty, rather than sexual transmission, and that drug companies are in cahoots with foreign governments in an effort to poison native Africans.

The government is slowly relenting after much pressure from an assortment of professional bodies and responsible businesses who acknowledged that the more than 5000 expert signatories to the Durban Declaration, which stated inter alia that HIV causes AIDS, probably knew what they were talking about.

Nevertheless, the government still persists in vocally pushing lemon juice, garlic and the African potato as preventatives and curatives. The estimated national infection rate among adults is about 22%, i.e. a bit more than one-fifth of the adult population (See here).

'Luthon64
 

Back
Top Bottom