• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Global climate change threatening species

jay gw

Unregistered
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,821
Global warming has had little noticeable impact in Washington, D.C. Politicians in the nation's capital have been reluctant to set limits on the carbon dioxide pollution that is expected to warm the planet by 4 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit during the next century, citing uncertainty about the severity of the threat.

These changes seriously threaten animals such as polar bears, which live and hunt on the sea ice. The bears have already suffered a 15 percent decrease in their number of offspring and a similar decline in weight over the past 25 years. If the Arctic sea ice disappears altogether during the summer months, as some researchers expect it will by the end of the century, polar bears have little chance of survival.

Things are less serious in the lower 48, where the effects of climate change have been more subtle. In much of the United States, spring arrives about two weeks earlier than it did 50 years ago. Tropical bird species have appeared in Florida and along the Gulf Coast.

http://www.detnews.com/2004/nation/0411/14/A11-4237.htm
 
What's your point?

Change in an environment always threatens specialized species within it.

Is this a bad thing? Is this a good thing? Or is it just the way things go.
 
Do we even know yet if humans are the main factor driving global warming? A few years ago I had seen some show on Discovery that had a chart of avg. temp. and solar activity for like the last 200 years, and the lines were almost identical, and both trending up in recent years. I haven't paid much attention to the debate, tho.
 
Donks said:
Do we even know yet if humans are the main factor driving global warming? A few years ago I had seen some show on Discovery that had a chart of avg. temp. and solar activity for like the last 200 years, and the lines were almost identical, and both trending up in recent years. I haven't paid much attention to the debate, tho.

Oh, no! The worms! They're out! Quick, get them back into that can! :D

Seriously, the answer to the above depends on who you talk with/what sources you choose to use.

Currently, there is no concensus in the scientific community.
 
jay gw said:
Global warming has had little noticeable impact in Washington, D.C. Politicians in the nation's capital have been reluctant to set limits on the carbon dioxide pollution that is expected to warm the planet by 4 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit during the next century, citing uncertainty about the severity of the threat.

These changes seriously threaten animals such as polar bears, which live and hunt on the sea ice. The bears have already suffered a 15 percent decrease in their number of offspring and a similar decline in weight over the past 25 years. If the Arctic sea ice disappears altogether during the summer months, as some researchers expect it will by the end of the century, polar bears have little chance of survival.

Things are less serious in the lower 48, where the effects of climate change have been more subtle. In much of the United States, spring arrives about two weeks earlier than it did 50 years ago. Tropical bird species have appeared in Florida and along the Gulf Coast.

http://www.detnews.com/2004/nation/0411/14/A11-4237.htm


Listen sonny. Don't you think it is a little presumptuous of you to be touting statistical inference as support for your beliefs whne elsewhere on this forum you freely admit you don't know the first thing about statistics.

Lets see GW. Tell us about the variance of migratory bird populations in various locations or of seasonal transition.

What? I didn't hear you? the vari..what?
 
Badger said:
Oh, no! The worms! They're out! Quick, get them back into that can! :D

Seriously, the answer to the above depends on who you talk with/what sources you choose to use.

Currently, there is no concensus in the scientific community.

A few months ago the American Association for the Advancement of Science (http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2004/0616climate.shtml), and the chief editor of Science Magazine publically announced that there is solid proof that humans are causing some climate change. I agree that the extent is controversial, however the consensus with scientists is that we are effecting the climate, especially with industrial and automotive emissions.
 

Back
Top Bottom