My girlfriend is a real estate agent - in Kingston, Ontario - she once related a story to me she came across in a training course early in her career. The story involves the sale of an alleged hunted house and the buyers subsequent legal action against the seller for non-disclosure of this preexisting condition.
I've always assumed that the story was an urban myth as she could never give me details as to date and location. Apparently I was wrong.
Stambovsky v. Ackley is a case from the New York state Appellate court, (1991), in which the plaintiff was granted the remedy of rescission in part because, "...the seller not only takes unfair advantage of the buyer's ignorance but has created and perpetuated a condition about which he is unlikely to even inquire..."
Ackley had created the condition in part by a story she had written entitled, "Our Haunted House on the Hudson", which appeared in the May 1977 edition of the Reader's Digest.
I could never understand how a court could rescind a contract because of poltergeist. Although it certainly makes sense if you consider the seller has created a condition that could adversely affect the value of the property.
Regardless of the condition.
Extreme cases may make bad law but they are damned interesting.
I've always assumed that the story was an urban myth as she could never give me details as to date and location. Apparently I was wrong.
Stambovsky v. Ackley is a case from the New York state Appellate court, (1991), in which the plaintiff was granted the remedy of rescission in part because, "...the seller not only takes unfair advantage of the buyer's ignorance but has created and perpetuated a condition about which he is unlikely to even inquire..."
Ackley had created the condition in part by a story she had written entitled, "Our Haunted House on the Hudson", which appeared in the May 1977 edition of the Reader's Digest.
I could never understand how a court could rescind a contract because of poltergeist. Although it certainly makes sense if you consider the seller has created a condition that could adversely affect the value of the property.
Regardless of the condition.
Extreme cases may make bad law but they are damned interesting.