Yes. He could be lucky with his prediction, which is why more predictions are required. However, it has already been established that the North Atlantic Oscillation is correlated with the solar cycle, so it would not be a big surprise if the ENSO cycle was similarly correlated.
Wrong. No one has correlated it besides Landscheidt, using the same junk science methods he uses in all his other junk science works. Which is why no one is gonna publish this crap except your butt-buddy John Daly.
He has made lots of predictions which are published well in advance.
Oh yeah, I forgot. He also forgot to publish them in print where they could be verified. But he made them, oh yes he did. He said so. He must be right, because Kepler did horoscopes.
Another irrelevant aside from our pseudoscientific troll.
I admit I'm a pseudoscientific troll, as long as science is defined as astrology and PlanetX research.
Except that Randi has to offer the prize as a challenge.
Jesus Christ you are ignorant. Have you even READ the Randi challenge?
One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge
It has to be APPLIED for! Randi has already offered the prize as a challenge. Its up to pseudoscience retards like yourself to take him up on it. Why don't you? Oh yeah, you are a coward as well as a liar. Buk-CAGH!
I doubt very much that Randi would do so, since Landscheidt's work is based on KAM theory, does not claim that they come from a paranormal activity or any "superpower"and also would take many years for a definitive test to be run.
Oh my yes, the world expert on KAM theory lectures us yet again. Its based on KAM theory cause he says it is. Really. Diamond says so too. Thats scientific proof. It is. Really. Becuase he says so.
Since Dr Landscheidt denies using astrology for his predictions it would seem that he would not likely enter for a Prize to prove something he does not claim.
Landscheidt is a liar and a fraud. He denies authoring his own publications.
On the other hand, volunteering someone else's prize is very brave....not.
I offered my own challenge and you chickened out as well. Seems to be a pattern, one likely reflected in you pathetic real life.
Except of course, you haven't read any of them. Despite that you feel free to ridicule what you think they contain. Argument from ignorance as well as ad hominem are your only real tools of choice.
I've read enough to know its astrology and it's ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊. You've read nothing, not even the original El Nino paper. Every time you open your fat mouth you commit an argument from ignorance.
Everytime you profane this forum with your digital excrement you launch an ad hominem.
As I wrote, I have no idea whether Landscheidt wrote this or not or even if this is the same Theodor Landscheidt. The one I wrote to, denied writing anything in defence of astrology.
What do you expect from a woowoo? You and he are the same, do you tell the truth when you are cornered? No. Of course not. You are are two junk science frauds in a pod.
In sum, let me quote what Dr Landcheidt actually said
He lies. Anyone can look up his publications in "Considerations" magazine.
Objective argument? Entirely alien concepts in YetiScience....
