GAGE: Response to NIST's Invitation for Written Comments

[BigAl]

www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=8472


Undisputed Facts Point to the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7

By Richard Gage

Global Research, March 28, 2008
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Response to NIST's Invitation for Written Comments

Documentation of spoken remarks presented on December 18 conference call with the NCST Advisory Committee

Emailed to NIST on January 3, 2008

Richard Gage, AIA – Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth


I'm Richard Gage, AIA, a licensed architect of 20 years. I represent Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a fast-growing body of more than 230 architects and engineers dedicated solely to bringing out the truth about all three high-rise building collapses on 9/11. We believe that we have answers to your questions about the puzzling collapse of World Trade Center 7.

*Snip*

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

© Copyright Richard Gage, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, 2008

The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=8472

© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca


​

Edited for copyright violation. Please review your membership agreement, especially Rule 4.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady

 

[ElMondoHummus]

How many more canards is that man going to repeat? Jesus...

 

[Architect]

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

Do not necessarily reflect reality, more like.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Really, I mean it! How many canards is he going to repeat? Molten steel? Sulfur from an unknown source?? Listing the components of thermate, but forgetting the barium? And presenting thermate evidence, then contradicting it by claiming "linear shaped charges"?? Good God!...

As paranoid and trutherish as this sounds, that statement almost looks like forged disinfo. I mean, the statements are that oblivious. It's as if Gage hasn't learned anything new since he begain peddling his 9/11 views.

Christ...

 

[boloboffin]

Really, I mean it! How many canards is he going to repeat? Molten steel? Sulfur from an unknown source?? Listing the components of thermate, but forgetting the barium? And presenting thermate evidence, then contradicting it by claiming "linear shaped charges"?? Good God!...

As paranoid and trutherish as this sounds, that statement almost looks like forged disinfo. I mean, the statements are that oblivious. It's as if Gage hasn't learned anything new since he begain peddling his 9/11 views.

Christ...

He hasn't learned anything new. Version 3.0 of his PowerPoint is hawking the "pull it" phrase.

 

[DGM]

Some day these morons are going to wake up and realize that Dr. James Quintiere does not support their twisted view of reality. I love that he would send a letter to NIST quoting him considering he doesn't support their views. It's like sending a quote mine to the author. These people are clueless morons along with the people that follow them.

Note to any lurkers that follow them. Don't drink the koolade it has a bad after taste.

 

[AZCat]

Appendix C of FEMA's BPAT Report (attached to this email) documents steel samples showing rapid oxidation, sulfidation, and intergranular melting. A liquid eutectic mixture, including sulfur from an unknown source, caused intense corrosion of the steel, gaping holes in wide flange beams, and the thinning of half-inch-thick flanges to almost razor-sharpness in the World Trade Center 7 steel. The New York Times called this "the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation."

NIST left all of this crucial forensic evidence out of its report. Why? Because it didn't fit in with the official conspiracy theory.
​

I'm really tired of this being flogged again and again by the "truth movement". Why would NIST comment on WTC7 steel in their report on WTC 1 & 2? More importantly, they do discuss FEMA Appx C in their report, only Gage & Co. are too lazy to look for it. I'll provide an easy clue for lurking truthers: NCSTAR 1-3C, Section 6.3.4, Single Column K-16 corresponds to FEMA Appx C Sample 2. NIST spends four pages discussing this sample, yet every [rule10] time I see this brought up by the "truth movement", there is no acknowledgment of this.
​