FDNY Decides to "Pull"

[Thunder]

the much beloved quote by Larry Silverstein states that he suggested that maybe the best thing to do with firefighting in wtc 7 is to "pull it". but more importantly, he then goes on to say "and THEY made the decision to pull". they....being the FDNY

if wtc 7 was purpusefully destroyed...a.k.a. "pulled"..then it was pulled by the FDNY..and that would make them conspirators in 9-11.

9-11 Deniars...need to be very careful..before the accuse the FDNY of conspiring to kill their own people.

 

[Quad4_72]

This has been discussed many times. CFs think that the FDNY was in on the CT but they won't come out in public and say it. Last time they did, an apology from woo woo Bermas was issued

 

[Coritani]

I mentioned this to a CF over at the LC forums in a debate. His reply was that I was reading into it too much.

 

[Gravy]

This has been discussed many times. CFs think that the FDNY was in on the CT but they won't come out in public and say it. Last time they did, an apology from woo woo Bermas was issued

Whatever he believes, Bermas didn't say that the FDNY was involved in destroying WTC 7. He said they were paid to keep their mouths shut about what they saw that day. And he didn't exactly apologize. He changed his claim from the firefighters being paid off, to them being threatened into silence.

Alex Jones and some of the creeps I confront at Ground Zero say the FDNY was directly involved in the crimes.

 

[Quad4_72]

Whatever he believes, Bermas didn't say that the FDNY was involved in destroying WTC 7. He said they were paid to keep their mouths shut about what they saw that day. And he didn't exactly apologize. He changed his claim from the firefighters being paid off, to them being threatened into silence.

Alex Jones and some of the creeps I confront at Ground Zero say the FDNY was directly involved in the crimes.

Oh yeah thats right. He did say that they were paid off. Where is his proof of this? Oh thats right, he has none.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

the much beloved quote by Larry Silverstein states that he suggested that maybe the best thing to do with firefighting in wtc 7 is to "pull it". but more importantly, he then goes on to say "and THEY made the decision to pull". they....being the FDNY

if wtc 7 was purpusefully destroyed...a.k.a. "pulled"..then it was pulled by the FDNY..and that would make them conspirators in 9-11.

9-11 Deniars...need to be very careful..before the accuse the FDNY of conspiring to kill their own people.

kevin barrett has apparently decreed that "they" means "FDNY and I" to silverstein

theres a thread on it around here somewhere

 

[Unfit4Command]

Whatever he believes, Bermas didn't say that the FDNY was involved in destroying WTC 7. He said they were paid to keep their mouths shut about what they saw that day. And he didn't exactly apologize. He changed his claim from the firefighters being paid off, to them being threatened into silence.

Alex Jones and some of the creeps I confront at Ground Zero say the FDNY was directly involved in the crimes.

I wish I could talk to some of the people at Ground Zero...some of them just sound like complete retards from the stories I read.

 

[CHF]

This has been discussed many times. CFs think that the FDNY was in on the CT but they won't come out in public and say it. Last time they did, an apology from woo woo Bermas was issued

Well sort of. Bermas changed "they were paid off" to "they were intimidated."

So basically the kid still thinks the FDNY knows da twoof but are keeping quiet.

 

[boloboffin]

Well sort of. Bermas changed "they were paid off" to "they were intimidated."

So basically the kid still thinks the FDNY knows da twoof but are keeping quiet.

In other words, they are being paid off. In exchange for keeping quiet, they get to keep their jobs and make money.

No apology, just weasel words.

 

[The Doc]

Jason never said that under his own will. It was a Jedi mind trick, remember?

 

[MikeW]

David Ray Griffin says this:

There is, in any case, only one theory that explains both the nature and the expectation of the collapse of building 7: Explosives had been set, and someone who knew this spread the word to the fire chiefs.
http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

In the context of the article he appears to be suggesting those chiefs then lied about the damage to WTC7, and the extent of the fires it faced, in order to cover this up. He doesn't explain why they'd do this, of course.