• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Expel Arafat?

hgc

Penultimate Amazing
hgc
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Messages
15,892
The issue of expelling Arafat from Palestine is coming to a head (article), since now a majority of Israel's security cabinet favors it. Sharon hasn't moved on it because the U.S. opposes the move.

What do you think? Does expelling Arafat "get [them] out of the current cycle of violence," as Defense Minister Mofaz claims? How much does Arafat really influence the fate of Palestine at this point anyway? It seems to me that Hamas is a powerful independent force (military and political) in Palestine, and only civil war will bring that country (such as it is) under the control of anyone willing to make a deal with Israel. Arafat wouldn't do it, Abbas couldn't do it. What difference does it make at this point whether Arafat sits in Ramallah or in some Arab capital in exile?
 
Let's hope that the Israeli government won't do this gross political mistake that will turn Yasser Arafat into a hero again.

During the last years a series of economic scandals, authoritarian administration of the organization, tortures and assassinations of his political opponents have resulted in a significant decrease of Arafat's popularity within PLO and the Palestinian people.

Expelling the historical leader of the Liberation Movement of the Palestinians has a symbolic meaning -at least this is how I interpret it--The Israeli government wants to show to the Arabs that after the resignation of Abas and the collapse of the Road Map plan they have nothing to expect from it and that the relations with the Palestinians are in the zero point again and practically non-existent.

If the above is true (which I think that it is because I follow the politics of the area since I remember myself) this shows that the Israeli government is doing a huge mistake: We are not in the 70ies, the patience of the International Community is almost exhausted, the accusations about the violation of the human rights are accumulating, our greatest sponsors, the people of USA have started questioning the alliance... somebody must break the news to the Israeli government...

As for the relations of Arafat with Hamas, I strongly disagree, it was just in August that we heard at the news that Arafat was hiding in his headquarters in Ramalah militants of Hamas.
 
Cleopatra

As for the relations of Arafat with Hamas, I strongly disagree, it was just in August that we heard at the news that Arafat was hiding in his headquarters in Ramalah militants of Hamas.
Click to expand...
Disagree with what? That Hamas is an independent force in the Palestinian body politic? That Arafat was hiding their people doesn't disprove that. For instance Hamas has clearly stated goal that are known to run counter to Arafat's goal (theocracy vs. secular authority). Afterall Arafat has his own suicide bomber organization (Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade) that he does control, and has shown that he can keep out of action if he wants.

My point is that the PA led by Arafat or anyone else will not completely control the Palestinian territory, and therefore will not have the authority to strike a deal, without a civil war. So not only is it foolish, as far as P.R. goes, to kick out Arafat, but it won't even accomplish what they claim it will (cessation of terror). Either the security cabinet is incredibly foolish, or the domestic political concerns around this are so overwhelming that they will do it anyway for that reason.
 
Expelling him is definitely wrong. They should kidnap him secretly and off him.
 
Originally posted by corplinx
Expelling him is definitely wrong.
They should kidnap him secretly and off him.
Click to expand...
Killing the pawn is a bad idea.
He brings to the table an appearance of being the voice of the people.
Kill him and the next power down is hammas - no outsiders recognize
them as ligit authorities. Very quickly the left of outsiders would see
that people have no power and that would be bad for the expansion.
 
From the BBC:
________________________________________________
The Israeli security cabinet has agreed in principle to expel Palestinian President Yasser Arafat.
The cabinet is understood to have asked the army to draw up a series of options for Mr Arafat's expulsion from his compound in the West Bank town of Ramallah.
The decision comes after Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon convened an urgent meeting of cabinet ministers to consider their response to suicide bombings on Monday that killed 15 people.

The BBC's James Reynolds in Jerusalem says the decision may be part of an effort by the Israelis to show the new Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei he should keep his distance from Mr Arafat.

'Serious threat'

"Arafat is an obstacle to peace and Israel will act to remove this obstacle," a statement from the meeting was quoted as saying.
________________________________________________

If Arafat is an obstacle to peace, the Vichy was an obstacle to Hitler's ambitions!

He bloody sold off 72% of the country so that the ZioNazis would recognise his 'authority'!
What sort of man, who gives away so much, can then be declared an 'obstacle to peace'?

I'm not saying this as a criticism of Arafat, he is the leader of the bulk of the Palestinians - they decide what happens and who represents them, not me.

I am only saying this to highlight just HOW MUCH has ALREADY been GIVEN to the ZioNazis.

This is just garbage. Grown people cannot hear this and remain silent, these Nazis are going to take over the whole of Palestine and they are going to do it with our HELP! our ARMS! our MONEY!




http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3098656.stm
 
hgc, I am sorry, I wasn't clear.

I think that Arafat is behind every terrorist activity in Israel.
He is in close relations with Hamas and he is quite aware of their actions and their plans.

I have been observing the game of chess that Hamas was playing with Abas and Israelis. The signature of the inspirator was quite clear: Yasser Arafat. Note that this rat was absent during the whole summer, he didn't appear not even once during the last months, he " returned" only a week before Abas' resignation. I know because I was "looking for him" in the Media and he was absent even from Electronic Indifanda!!

As I mentioned in my previous post, the Israeli Cabinet lives in the 70ies... They think that they can expel Arafat without any cost, they are a bunch of idiots that they have the slightest idea about politics.

I HOPE that the American government will prevent them from doing such a foolishness.
 
The post above mine is another example of trolling. I suggest we ignore the poster and we continue our serious discussion.
 
No, Cleo, that report is the reaction to the "in principle" decision of the Israeli cabinet.

There MUST be a way to "ease" Arafat out without resorting to any actions that would make him a martyr - that would be the last thing to bring any peace.
 
Zep said:
No, Cleo, that report is the reaction to the "in principle" decision of the Israeli cabinet.
Click to expand...

Zep The term "in principle" means that the political decision won't be put in effect immediately but it's an official decision of the Israeli government.

svero Apart from the fact that Arafat has been connected with specific militants of Hamas, he has never condemned its terrorists attacks. Apart from vague statements and wishful thinking he has never referred directly to Hamas when he talks about their terrorist attacks.
 
The Israelis like to make a big deal out of Arafat. When the peace talks are on, they claim he doesn't do enough against Hamas. When they're off, they claim he's a terrorist mastermind.

The reality is, Arafat's just a politically impotent opportunist. He has as much ability to control Al-Aqsa, Hamas, and the rest, as I have of controlling Dubya. Hell, he can't even control the PA.

So the Israelis and the Americans had Arafat name a Prime Minister. Problem is, Abbas couldn't control Hamas, Al-Aqsa, etc. either. So they're going back to blaming Arafat.

Politically, Arafat's rather moderate. Since the PLO officially dropped the demand for a democratic, secular Palestine (sometimes translated as "the destruction of the state of Israel"), he's constantly waffled between the two-state moderates and the one-staters depending on the situation. He really *isn't* a Muslim fundamentalist like Hamas (who, for those with a short memory, declared war on the PA a couple years back).

Arafat IS a symbol to the Palestinians, more than he is an actual leader. If you talk to Palestinians on the street, they KNOW he's an incompetent fool, but the attitude is, "he's OUR incompetent fool."

So expelling Arafat will do the following:
--It will piss off the Palestinians
--It will get him out of the country

It will not accomplish anything else for the Israelis. Killing him would just piss off the Palestinians more.
 
Cleopatra said:


Zep The term "in principle" means that the political decision won't be put in effect immediately but it's an official decision of the Israeli government.

svero Apart from the fact that Arafat has been connected with specific militants of Hamas, he has never condemned its terrorists attacks. Apart from vague statements and wishful thinking he has never referred directly to Hamas when he talks about their terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...

Uh, dude, do a google on "Arafat condemns attacks." One quote popped up in the top ten:

"'I condemn the attacks carried out by terrorist groups against Israeli civilians,' Arafat wrote in an editorial published on Sunday in The New York Times. 'These groups do not represent the Palestinian people or their legitimate aspirations for freedom. They are terrorist organisations. Palestinians are ready to end the conflict,' Arafat wrote."

That's not particularly vague....
 
Cleon wrote:
"Uh, dude, do a google on "Arafat condemns attacks." One quote popped up in the top ten:

"'I condemn the attacks carried out by terrorist groups against Israeli civilians,' Arafat wrote in an editorial published on Sunday in The New York Times. 'These groups do not represent the Palestinian people or their legitimate aspirations for freedom. They are terrorist organisations. Palestinians are ready to end the conflict,' Arafat wrote."

That's not particularly vague...."

It`s not particularly vaugue and neither is this:

"July 24 2002 - Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon Tuesday congratulated his forces on the air strike that killed the military leader Hamas in Gaza, along with 13 civilians, including eight children. While the U.S. did not comment on the F-16 attack, the Palestinian Authority said it will file a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Sharon called the raid on Gaza City that killed a total of 15 people "one of the most successful operations" to have been carried out by Israel's forces, Israeli Army Radio said, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP)."

As far as terrorism goes, Sharon leaves Arafat in the shadow of his hateful blubber.
To talk of expelling Arafat while keeping Sharon there, as leader of Israel shows how far we in the west have sunk into the double standards that the rest of the world sees so clearly.
Sharon, who President Bush called "a man of peace", is a blatent war criminal. Most of us have stepped in things that have more humanity and compassion than this piece of work.
 
Cleopatra said:

svero Apart from the fact that Arafat has been connected with specific militants of Hamas, he has never condemned its terrorists attacks. Apart from vague statements and wishful thinking he has never referred directly to Hamas when he talks about their terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...

Hmm..well not condemning or even being associated with Hamas doesn't necessarily imply total control of the organization or all organizations. I've never really been convinced that Arafat has as much power as the Israelis let on in terms of stopping terrorism. I've always pretty much believed that to be a political tool. I was very surprised that they voted to expel him because I think he actually serves certain Israeli interests, but I guess he's not actually gone yet.
 
Looks like Cleopatra is right.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/09/12/1063341772107.html

The Israeli cabinet has made his day.

13n_arafat2,0.jpg
 
Zep said:
There MUST be a way to "ease" Arafat out without resorting to any actions that would make him a martyr - that would be the last thing to bring any peace.
Click to expand...

How about expelling him from the Palestinian sector to the Israeli sector? Why not take him to Tel Aviv and have him work and live in close proximity to the things the bombers are bombing? The Israelis can claim it as the way for Arafat to show his commitment to the peace plan by living and working with the Israelis...

:crazy:
 
dsm said:
How about expelling him from the Palestinian sector to the Israeli sector? Why not take him to Tel Aviv and have him work and live in close proximity to the things the bombers are bombing? The Israelis can claim it as the way for Arafat to show his commitment to the peace plan by living and working with the Israelis...

:crazy:
Click to expand...
Don't know if the smilie means you are joking...but I'll accept this as a reasonable response. Would he go, though? Can it be accomplished without seeming to "kidnapping" him?

I'm just worried that someone on either side will do something TOO rash that will start an all-out war again. (And yes, I agree, suicide bombings and pinpoint retaliation is not trivial.) That way is just madness for everyone...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom