• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Evolution in the Deepest River in the World - Congo

William Parcher

Show me the monkey!
Joined
Jul 26, 2005
Messages
27,472
This is a fascinating story of the mighty Congo River and how it is a unique theater for evolution of fishes. I had no idea that it is the deepest river, and that although it may be only 1 mile wide, the depth and currents are such that there is not a biodiversity mixing on both sides, or even top to bottom. The middle of the river may as well be as physically impenetrable as a mountain range for some species.


Evolution in the Deepest River in the World

The computer hums while processing data. Eventually Gardiner pulls up a graph profiling the river's bed. It looks like a U - as smooth as a mountain valley carved by a glacier. The current just beneath the surface is traveling at 30 miles per hour, and the channel is 640 feet deep. That's the deepest point measured on a river in the world," Gardiner says. "There's no question about that."

Shelton is peering over Gardiner's shoulder, shaking his head and deciphering blue and red lines on the computer screen that represent water movement and velocity.

"Just like we thought," he says. "Fabulous stuff." He nudges a moth off the screen and points to a place in the riverbed where a long blue line indicates the current dropping vertically from a ledge into the canyon's trough.

It's an underwater waterfall," he says, slapping Gardiner's shoulder. It's falling at 40 feet per second. Upstream of the waterfall is an eddy, the water relatively still. This point is likely habitat for the blind cichlid: calm pockets where sheering currents have trapped the fish at great depths. Deep-river specimens, like the one found today, surface only when the river surges and flushes individuals into the harsh environment of the main flow. In terms of Stiassny's hypothesis, the finding suggests that the Congo's currents partition habitat from side to side and from top to bottom - just like a mountain range.

"It shows water can be an evolutionary barrier, even for fish," Gardiner says.
 

Attachments

  • lower-Congo-River-388.jpg
    lower-Congo-River-388.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 20
640 feet deep and a 30 mph current, wow. That's an impressive amount of energy.
 
Wow! Those elephant fish are interesting.

Darwin's fishes ;)
“These are elephant fish,” Stiassny says. “Their jaws are at the end of their snouts so they can pick food from the gravel.”

The evolutionary adaptations are apparent. Each individual was caught in a different location, and each snout is specialized to the character of the river floor in which it fed.
 
I've subscribed to Smithsonian magazine for years. It's probably my favorite thing to read every month. Well worth every penny.
 
For some species, a single lane road through a jungle will create the same sort of divide as the river depth...though its a much newer phenomena.

The St. Lawrence river is arguably deeper than the Congo.
 
For some species, a single lane road through a jungle will create the same sort of divide as the river depth...though its a much newer phenomena.

The St. Lawrence river is arguably deeper than the Congo.

ooh, let's argue then :)

I don't think the St. Lawrence get to be over 300 feet deep at any point. Even if you do find a section that is, you're still having to deal with it being a seaway as oposed to a river. I'm guessing you've found a point near the ocean where it may be over 640 feet deep?
 
This is a fascinating story of the mighty Congo River and how it is a unique theater for evolution of fishes. I had no idea that it is the deepest river, and that although it may be only 1 mile wide ...

It is fascinating, and that's just the Congo River as it emerges from the vast area it drains.

... the depth and currents are such that there is not a biodiversity mixing on both sides, or even top to bottom. The middle of the river may as well be as physically impenetrable as a mountain range for some species.

Absolutely. It's all about context.

It's sobering to think that not only are our planet's oceans mostly a mystery to us but we've a huge amount to discover about its great rivers.
 
Thanks for posting up this fascinating article.
I went through the comments and found an ID/creationist with this to say:

Posted by on November 7,2009 | 09:04AM

Evolution as it is being pushed upon us by the secular humanists(a religion as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court) is a crock. The idea of all life evoloving from a single cell organism is so far fetched and improbable that they had to come up with the idea that the earth is billions of years old. This is the only possiblity that it could have happened. Changes can occur due to adapting to an environment. That is why those from a more hot, arrid climate are usually darker skinned, or from a more frigid climate develop thicker layers of fat and lighter skin, but the are of the same species. Even in the study of geology there are 2 schools of thought in the formation of land masses. One says they were formed over millions of years and another formed as a result of a catastophic action. The latter seems more plausible since it is a fact that all of the granite on the planet was formed inside of a ten minute span of time. The study of the fossil history shows that it can all be accounted for in the last 10,000 years and teh dating tools used by the evolution side require an undisturbed time frame. This history was disturbed and folows the course of the live that was destroyed during a major whole earth flood. Most of the arguments I heard for evolution in college biology have been proven wrong for more that 100 years. Get the facts folks.


Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/scien...er-in-the-World.html?c=y&page=2#ixzz0WLFHzLWw

Bolding mine.
 
ooh, let's argue then :)

I don't think the St. Lawrence get to be over 300 feet deep at any point. Even if you do find a section that is, you're still having to deal with it being a seaway as oposed to a river. I'm guessing you've found a point near the ocean where it may be over 640 feet deep?
Bonobos and Chimpanzees are separated by a river. I think that was all it took for those two primate species to evolve separately.
 
Well, yes, but the image of all the granite on this planet being formed in 10 minutes amused me.
I wonder where the phrase actually comes from, because obviously the writer, well, repeats on trust what he has been told.

Added:
Found.
WHY GRANITE IS SO IMPORTANT—If you want to build a house, you erect all the materials on a very solid foundation. If you do not do so, the ground beneath ma y eventually sink different amounts in different places, and the house will crack and may eventually collapse. All of our continents have been placed on a very solid foundation: granite. There is no rock more solid and enduring than granite. There are immense quantities of it beneath us.

Robert Gentry's research establishes the fact that all of this granite came into existence in solid form within less than 3 minutes time. Yet if this is so, then all the rest of the world had to be brought Into existence just as rapidly. If the granite suddenly appeared in less than 3 minutes, while the rest of the world was molten rock, then the granite would have melted. So our world came into existence all at once—and all of its rock and mineral matter within 3 minutes.
http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cach...n+of+time&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=es&lr=lang_en
 
Last edited:
Shale we agree on that?

About the researcher, Robert V. GentryWP
 
Shale we agree on that?

About the researcher, Robert V. GentryWP

This line broke my head:

Robert V. Gentry (born 1933), a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, is a nuclear physicist and young Earth creationist[...]
How do you even reconcile that science with that belief? I mean, the level of cognitive dissonance must be staggering.
 
Me, too, Fishstick.
I had to read it twice before I knew what wasn't right.
You could be forgiven for thinking just a hint of sarky got in under the radar there.
And the studied politeness of the mention of his book. :D
 

Back
Top Bottom