Euro Area Financial Crisis Inevitable?

Puppycow

Penultimate Amazing
Puppycow
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
32,131
Location
Yokohama, Japan
It appears that some kind of default is inevitable for Greece at least. Even if everything goes according to the most optimistic projections, their debt will continue to increase.

Other countries like Ireland, Portugal and Spain also have major problems.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repo...es-projected-deficit-for-2010/article1799565/

http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...ays-spain-may-be-downgraded-dollar-gains.html

What will happen if they decide bondholders have to take a big haircut?
Or is there another way out? Will Germans accept paying for other countries' debts?
Will the ECB print new money to pay for the debts?

How will this be resolved if it becomes impossible for countries to pay their debts?
 
Yeah, does the Euro act as a quasi gold standard, in that governments can no longer inflate their way out of debt?
 
Sceptic-PK said:
Yeah, does the Euro act as a quasi gold standard, in that governments can no longer inflate their way out of debt?
Click to expand...

That would appear to be the case under the current rules, or at least the rules prior to the Greek crisis. But I think those rules have already been bent a little, and a political consensus may form around allowing them to be bnt even more, because it may be preferable to the alternatives.

Formerly, (IIRC) the ECB was prohibited from buying any member nation's debt. But I believe they began to do it by buying some Greek debt. This seems like a strong possibility to me, although there is strong resistance to the idea in the ECB itself and countries like Germany.
 
I the Euro is the only currency in the world that cannot inflate, it will become the most expensive currency in no time.

Can the ECB "print" money?
 
I the Euro is the only currency in the world that cannot inflate, it will become the most expensive currency in no time.

Can the ECB "print" money?
Click to expand...

My understanding is that it can inflate, however, all the member nations need to agree on how much.

Greece, has been giving their people way more than they produce for the last 20 years, if not 60 years. In the old days, they could just inflate the drachma. The pension payment wouldn't change, but it would buy less bread than it used to. In other words, what people produced would eventually match what people spent, as a nation.

It works reasonably well, especially if you are a Greek politician, as you can campaign on a platform of "Vote for Me! Get Free Stuff!"

But now, with the Euro, Greece can't do this on it's own. Germany, and other countries, don't make these big promises. And they don't want Greek promises to screw up their economy. So, Greece now has to squeeze it's people directly, by breaking all it's promises, which is a much more harsh way of matching spending to producing.

As an aside, the British are looking smarter and smarter all the time for not throwing their Pound into this mix...
 
Puppycow said:
Greece raises 1.95 bn euros at 4.9%

4.9% doesn't sound too bad -- until you realize that it's for 6-month debt. The US pays 0.17% for 6-month debt.

Greek 10-year debt is now 10% higher than that for Germany.
Click to expand...

Theoretically, the inflation rates for Germany and Greece should be the same, considering that they share a currency. So the difference (and that is a huge difference!) between Greece and Germany is in one of two places.

1. Risk that Greece drops out or gets thrown out of the Euro, and their replacement currency for their bonds is devalued.

2. Risk that Greece will default on their debt.
 
Puppycow said:
It's a little hard to say with certainty, but if the following stories are true, that would appear to be what they are doing, in effect:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...greek-bonds-amid-irish-talks-traders-say.html

http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...-portuguese-greek-government-bonds-today.html
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's how I understand it, too:

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/spain-is-not-too-big-to-save

The ECB, with the approval of the European Union, could easily cover the debts of Spain and any other country for the simple reason, to take Ben Bernanke's line, that it has a printing press. It is possible that the ECB will opt not to save Spain, either because of concerns about inflation or simply out of a desire to teach Spain a lesson (i.e. it was stupid to join the euro) but this would be a choice. Spain could be saved if the euro zone countries want to save it.

It is also worth noting that Spain may well be better off if it is not saved. Its unemployment rate is currently over 20 percent. The austerity being demanded by the euro zone countries will prevent the unemployment rate from declining any time soon. By contrast, if Spain were to default on its debt and leave the euro it would be immediately be free to take steps to boost growth and employment. This could lead to a sharp turnaround and a rapid move back toward full employment.

This is exactly what happened in Argentina. It had a sharp 6-month plunge after its December 2001 default, but then had 7 years of solid growth until the world economic crisis in 2008 brought Argentina's economy to a near standstill.
Click to expand...


http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/paul-krugman-on-the-euro-crisis

First, there are powerful forces who are working hard to prevent the partial or full Argentinification (partial default or a departure from the euro) of any euro zone country. After all, it does mean that banks and other creditors don't get back all of their money. They will lie, cheat, and steal to try to prevent such a route from even being considered. We know this because of the efforts of the international financial community to punish Argentina when it went the route of Argentinification back in 2002.

The IMF did everything it could to strangle Argentina (it was known internally as the "A" word) including the publication of consistently over-pessimistic growth projections in order to undermine confidence in its economy. Given that many of the same people who were shooting at Argentina in 2002 are still around in positions of responsibilty today, it is reasonable to believe that any country that tried to follow the same path would face similar efforts at economic sabotage.

The other important point is that the "revived Europeanism" route that Krugman outlines would essentially be costless right now to the core countries who would ostensibly be financing it. This is the route that would have the European Union and/or European Central Bank provide the funding necessary to get Ireland, Greece, Spain and other peripheral countries through the crisis.

This route would be largely costless because Europe, like the United States, has huge amounts of excess capacity and idle resources. The ECB could essentially finance the transfers by buying bonds (i.e. printing money) just as the Fed can (and to some extent is) finance the U.S. deficit by buying bonds. While printing money at other times would raise the risk of inflation, this is not the case in the middle of a steep downturn like the current one. Of course a modest increase in the rate of inflation (e.g. 3-4 percent) would be desirable in any case since it would lower real interest rates and reduce real debt burdens.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Puppycow said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/magazine/16Europe-t.html?_r=1&hp

The hard right often favors hard money — preferably a gold standard — but left-leaning European politicians have been enthusiastic proponents of the euro. Liberal American economists, myself included, tend to favor freely floating national currencies that leave more scope for activist economic policies — in particular, cutting interest rates and increasing the money supply to fight recessions.
Click to expand...

Statists like Krugman favor a monetary system that enables arbitrarilly unlimited taxation. Big surprise here. What better invention exists for politicians and bankers to buy votes than a monetary printing press?

Imagine that you’re a country that, like Spain today, recently saw wages and prices driven up by a housing boom, which then went bust. Now you need to get those costs back down. But getting wages and prices to fall is tough: nobody wants to be the first to take a pay cut, especially without some assurance that prices will come down, too. Two years of intense suffering have brought Irish wages down to some extent, although Spain and Greece have barely begun the process. It’s a nasty affair, and as we’ll see later, cutting wages when you’re awash in debt creates new problems.

If you still have your own currency, however, you wouldn’t have to go through the protracted pain of cutting wages: you could just devalue your currency — reduce its value in terms of other currencies — and you would effect a de facto wage cut.
Click to expand...

Here we have a glimmer of honesty from Krugman! Of course, a central bank sponsored "de facto wage cut" is also a de facto tax increase (on the poor) - a transfer of wealth from the wage earners and the savers, to whoever gets to spend the new money (bankers and politicians). Of course, what Krugman won't mention is that the ECB caused the economic dislocations that the PIGS are suffering from currently by years of monetary inflation, and unaccountable government spending.

Won’t workers reject de facto wage cuts via devaluation just as much as explicit cuts in their paychecks? Historical experience says no. In the current crisis, it took Ireland two years of severe unemployment to achieve about a 5 percent reduction in average wages. But in 1993 a devaluation of the Irish punt brought an instant 10 percent reduction in Irish wages measured in German currency.
Click to expand...

Since the inflation tax is a passive form of taxation, it can be done without worker's consent. There is nothing to reject. As long as they continue to accept renumeration for employment in a fiat currency, they will be at the mercy of this form of surreptitious looting. According to Krugman, however, it's all for a good cause, the health of the general economy.

Why the difference? Back in 1953, Milton Friedman offered an analogy: daylight saving time. It makes a lot of sense for businesses to open later during the winter months, yet it’s hard for any individual business to change its hours: if you operate from 10 to 6 when everyone else is operating 9 to 5, you’ll be out of sync. By requiring that everyone shift clocks back in the fall and forward in the spring, daylight saving time obviates this coordination problem. Similarly, Friedman argued, adjusting your currency’s value solves the coordination problem when wages and prices are out of line, sidestepping the unwillingness of workers to be the first to take pay cuts.
Click to expand...

In other words, it's more expeditious to steal from everyone at the same time, rather than on an individual basis. Of course this theft is necessary given the extreme circumstances. Or so we should believe.

Also, Nevada, unlike Ireland, doesn’t have to worry about the cost of bank bailouts, not because the state has avoided large loan losses but because those losses, for the most part, aren’t Nevada’s problem. Thus Nevada accounts for a disproportionate share of the losses incurred by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage companies — losses that, like Social Security and Medicare payments, will be covered by Washington, not Carson City.
Click to expand...

No they won't, the losses will be covered by average Americans, for whom the parasites in Washington are presumably acting on their behalf.
 
Last edited:
I think this whole financial crisis in Europe is deliberate, as do I believe the 2008 financial crisis in the US was deliberate as well.

There are powerful people who want nothing more than a world-government which will be anything but democratic, and causing huge financial implosions are an excellent way for them to get their way
 
Last edited:
INRM said:
I think this whole financial crisis in Europe is deliberate, as do I believe the 2008 financial crisis in the US was deliberate as well.

There are powerful people who want nothing more than a world-government which will be anything but democratic, and causing huge financial implosions are an excellent way for them to get their way
Click to expand...

So, do you actually any evidence to support these outlandish notions? What mechanisms were used (and by whom) to cause the financial crisis?
 
INRM said:
I think this whole financial crisis in Europe is deliberate, as do I believe the 2008 financial crisis in the US was deliberate as well.
Click to expand...

Yes. You're well-known to spin fanciful and paranoiac fantasies with no basis in reality.
 
Puppycow said:
It appears that some kind of default is inevitable for Greece at least. Even if everything goes according to the most optimistic projections, their debt will continue to increase.

Other countries like Ireland, Portugal and Spain also have major problems.
Click to expand...

I think all of Europe has major problems. The EU is a horrible failure and is full of hippocrits.

Puppycow said:
What will happen if they decide bondholders have to take a big haircut?
Click to expand...

BIG SCISSORS!?

Fires like usual. European people love fires. You know...raise retirement age couple years then burn the country side. I guess that's that sense of civility Europe smuggly puts in everyone else's faces.

Puppycow said:
Or is there another way out?
Click to expand...

Way out!? There is no way out. All the smart Europeans left a couple centuries ago. Where are you gonna go? Don't come to the USA we have enough psychotic socialists.

Go to Saudi Arabia or something and tell em how bad it is to be a fundie and how no matter what job they give you they are required to give you 2 weeks paid vacation, retirement at 30yrs of age, and socialized medicine (which is what helped get you guys in the situation you are in now).

Puppycow said:
Will Germans accept paying for other countries' debts?
Click to expand...

No. They will get ticked off like in WWII and start destroying the people who they will blame the problem on. That is History for you. It repeats itself.

Puppycow said:
Will the ECB print new money to pay for the debts?
Click to expand...

They will have to.

Puppycow said:
How will this be resolved if it becomes impossible for countries to pay their debts?
Click to expand...

WAR. Like always.
 
I think USEagle13 is a little jealous of our European lifestyles and frightened of the Eurozone as an economic entity.

I realise that he/she is working to polemic effect but he/she is either very misinformed about Europe generally and the EU specifically or they're just trolling for effect.

The EU is by no means perfect but I consider its major accomplishments to include:

- The integration of the former Eastern-bloc countries
- The rollout of consistent human rights legislation across Europe
- Free movement of people across mainland Europe
- Movement of labour across Europe

I suspect USEagle13 would love to work in a country where the standard work week is 35 hours, where people typically have 6 weeks paid vacation a year (in addition to national holidays) and were the poor, old and sick don't live in fear of not being able to afford high quality healthcare
 
The Don said:
I suspect USEagle13 would love to work in a country where the standard work week is 35 hours, where people typically have 6 weeks paid vacation a year (in addition to national holidays) and were the poor, old and sick don't live in fear of not being able to afford high quality healthcare
Click to expand...

He wants to live in Australia? ;)

Yeah, yeah we only get 4 weeks vacation, but 4 weeks in the sun trumps 6 weeks in sleet.
 
I dated a girl from Australia when I was younger whom was here on some kind of cultural work trade visa thingy. They are ok but seeing as how all the top deadliest animals in the world are there.....no thanks. You can have fun playing with funnel webs and microscopic killer jelly fish. Besides Australia is more like an aquarium right now.


Jealous of Europe!? Puuuuullleeeaassee. How many times we gotta save you sorry Sods. Honestly.

Only reason you guys are even remotely safe from the Kings of the East at the moment is because of us. Once we get destroyed (Wings of Eagle torn from the Lion in the Bible) you guys are next.

Some Union you got huh? Once someone gets in monetary trouble you talk about kicking em out. Why doesn't London throw in the pound huh?

That missile defense system should be put along the US Canadian border not Europe. But they putting in Europe. Doesn't matter anyways Russia has new missiles that it can't defend against.

Who went to the moon 1st? What country developed that lil thingy you typing on now!? Where did your cars come from!? Electricity!? Airplane!? I can go on and on.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom