"ESO Explosive Evidence" at Amazon

[Miragememories]

"You might want to get Chandler to rename this video then:"

Oystein overstates his point when he says; "Chandler believes there were nanothermite rockets attached to steel segments that fired after the segments had long broken loose from the buildings."

A rocket-like characterization is not the same as saying it was a rocket.

If you wish to obsess about he video's title, that's your problem.

Chandler's opening words quickly removed any doubt about his intended meaning.

"When I did the video 'South Tower Smoking Guns', I called attention to the downward moving projectile.

I loosely refer to it as a 'rocket projectile' because of its appearance."

MM

 

[BStrong]

You might want to get Chandler to rename this video then:

Oh, I bet that leaves a mark.

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

Oystein overstates his point when he says; "Chandler believes there were nanothermite rockets attached to steel segments that fired after the segments had long broken loose from the buildings."

So you acknowledge that Oystein wasn't lying then. Good.


Furthermore, Chandler's video description states:

Some of the debris from the South Tower at the World Trade Center shot downward faster than gravity. This is literal, visible proof of explosive materials painted onto perimeter wall units.

I'd say if anyone's overstating their point it's Chandler, wouldn't you?

A rocket-like characterization is not the same as saying it was a rocket.

Unfortunately, Chandler chose to title his video "Rockets at the World Trade Center".

Not "Rocket-like behaviour at the World Trade Center" or "Things that look like rockets at the World Trade Center", but "Rockets at the World Trade Center"

Chandler's opening words quickly removed any doubt about his intended meaning.

You claimed he never used the term "Rockets". I showed you an example of him doing just that. Chandler's phrase "I loosely refer to it as a 'rocket projectile' because of its appearance" doesn't help his case either




ETA - Here's a thread from 2011 on Chandler and his rockets:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=220411

 

[beachnut]

Rockets at the World Trade Center - Chandler

Oystein overstates his point when he says; "Chandler believes there were nanothermite rockets attached to steel segments that fired after the segments had long broken loose from the buildings."

A rocket-like characterization is not the same as saying it was a rocket.

If you wish to obsess about he video's title, that's your problem.

Chandler's opening words quickly removed any doubt about his intended meaning.

MM

Chandler thinks the wallboard dust and smoke from fire is thermite. Chandler, why do you make up silly claims based on nonsense?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xvw0_i1rGns
Chandler says, Rockets at the World Trade Center.

He actually believes thermite propelled the large section of the WTC down. Doing it with low resolution video. He was a physics teacher who thinks there were literally rockets at the WTC, and he says so in his video. Harrit inspired him. A nut inspired him.

... Chandler's opening words quickly removed any doubt about his intended meaning. ....MM

lol, his closing words left no doubt his intended meaning. Did you watch the video, or cherry-pick the video. Oops, cherry-pick, out in the orchard of woo with Balsamo.

 

[LSSBB]

Oystein overstates his point when he says; "Chandler believes there were nanothermite rockets attached to steel segments that fired after the segments had long broken loose from the buildings."

A rocket-like characterization is not the same as saying it was a rocket.

If you wish to obsess about he video's title, that's your problem.

Chandler's opening words quickly removed any doubt about his intended meaning.



MM

How else would nanothermite propel parts of the building downward if it was not used as some kind of rocket? There needs to be a rocket chamber to direct the thrust.

Not that there could be anything like a "nanothermite rocket" on 9/11 anyway.

Your Physics hero ain't much of a Physicist. Ask him to show you a graph with sustained freefall by WTC7.