• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Drugs & Automatic weapons kill 3,700

Mephisto

Philosopher
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
6,064
It just seems wrong to pick a fight, then ask someone else to finish it. Of course, we might have been able to finish it ourselves had we not invaded a country completely unrelated to the most devastating terrorist attack on the U.S.

Insurgent activity rising in Afghanistan

POSTED: 7:48 a.m. EST, November 13, 2006

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- Insurgent activity in Afghanistan has risen fourfold this year, and militants now launch more than 600 attacks a month, a rising wave of violence that has resulted in 3,700 deaths in 2006, a bleak new report found.

Afghanistan saw about 130 insurgent attacks a month last year, said the report by the Joint Coordination and Monitoring Board, which consists of representatives from Afghanistan and the international community, including the United Nations.

The new report said insurgents were launching more than 600 attacks a month as of the end of September, up from 300 a month at the end of March this year. The violence has killed more than 3,700 people this year, it said.

Officials said on Sunday that in the volatile border area near Pakistan, more than 20 Taliban militants -- and possibly as many as 60 -- were killed during several days of clashes.

"Confronting increased insurgent activity has diverted much of the government's attention and significant resources," the report said.

"It threatens to reverse some of the gains made in the recent past, with development activities being especially hard hit in several areas, resulting in partial or total withdrawal of international agencies in a number of the worst-affected provinces."

The report said that the rising drugs trade in Afghanistan has "significantly helped fuel" the insurgency in four volatile southern provinces. The slow pace of development is contributing to popular disaffection and ineffective implementation of the drug fight, it said.

Afghanistan's poppy crop, which is used to make heroin, increased by 59 percent in Afghanistan this past year.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/11/12/afghan.violence.ap/index.html
_____________

Wasn't the Taliban pretty effective in stopping the drug trade? I guess this whole war on terrorism would be going well if we could only get the drug trade in Afghanistan back to pre-invasion levels, and the death and torture in Iraq back to pre-invasion levels.
 
Last edited:
When will Drugs and Automatic weapons learn that violence is not the answer?
 
(snip)

Wasn't the Taliban pretty effective in stopping the drug trade? I guess this whole war on terrorism would be going well if we could only get the drug trade in Afghanistan back to pre-invasion levels, and the death and torture in Iraq back to pre-invasion levels.

No.

Afghanistan’s Role in Drug Production
Afghanistan’s role as the world’s largest opium producer is well documented. Until
recently, the majority of Afghan opium production had taken place in Taliban controlled
territory. According to the Department of State’s International Narcotics Control
Strategy Report, March 2001 (INCSR),1 Afghanistan remained the world’s major
producer of opium poppy despite a protracted drought, and ongoing civil war. The report
also noted that “the Taliban, which controls 96 percent of the territory where poppy is
grown, promote(d) poppy cultivation to finance weapons purchases as well as military operations.”2 Although the Taliban reportedly banned opium poppy cultivation in late
1997, opium production in Afghanistan increased through the year 2000, accounting for
72% of the worlds illicit opium supply, according to U.S. government sources. Most
Afghan opium is sold in Europe and not the United States.
On July 27, 2000, the Taliban again issued a decree banning opium poppy cultivation.
According to the March 2001 INCSR, the announcement of the ban caused prices to rise.
However, the State Department noted that “Neither the Taliban nor the Northern Alliance
has taken any significant action to seize stored opium, precursor chemicals or arrest and
prosecute narcotics traffickers. On the contrary, authorities continue to tax the opium
poppy crop at about ten percent, and allow it to be sold in open bazaars, traded and
transported”.3

http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/6210.pdf

The Taliban had a "wink wink, nudge, nudge" ban on opium production.
 
Wasn't the Taliban pretty effective in stopping the drug trade? I guess this whole war on terrorism would be going well if we could only get the drug trade in Afghanistan back to pre-invasion levels, and the death and torture in Iraq back to pre-invasion levels.
The Taliban stopped most poppy cultivation, but the drug trade continued. Reason was there was an enormous stockpile of opium, a few missed harvests had no effect on opium availability.

I suppose we could also stop poppy production just as effectively as the Taliban, but I doubt that images of publicly beheaded poppy farmers would play well in the West. Fines and destruction of the fields just doesn't have the same deterrent effect for some reason.

eta: HeyLeroy beat me to it, w/ a much better post to boot! The bastard... ;)
 
I read the words "poppy crop" and can't stop laughing at this serious situation in which lives are lost.
 
:D @ WildCat. Thanks.

I've followed the history of Afghanistan for quite some time. When I was a young 'un I used to send some of my paper route money to an agency that provided aid for kids orphaned by the Soviet invasion. The Soviets pursued some horrific policies against the civilian population.

And I remember from when that war was still going on, seeing a brick of Afghani hashish that was imprinted with a logo that featured a bent arm holding an AK-47, over it was the curved slogan "Smoke Russia To Death".
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom